Barricade

Barricade — CS2 Stats

US76561198287737223[U:1:327471495]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,300Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,642Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,540Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,641 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

18,656Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,641Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,641
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,540
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,460 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.2%46.8%48.2%11.0% short
Shot accuracy12.6%13.0%13.3%0.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate49.5%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBarricadeFACEITLevel 8 · 1,641 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,540 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,641csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning68
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–38–7Last 10055%Win rateLWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +78ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time510ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 16–13 · anubis, 31 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · poseidon, 1 Jun →
320msFastest reaction time · 10–2 · ancient, 29 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 4 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB1910–953%0.05
mirageC188–1044%0.02
ancientC167–944%0.01
nukeS118–373%0.05
dust2A116–555%0.00
anubisS96–367%0.04
infernoB84–450%0.04
poseidon—44–0100%0.03
debris—11–0100%0.12
eldorado—10–10%0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.12
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

131,558Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
6,556Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
37.2%Headshot %
12.6%Shot accuracy
22,296MVPs
2,563Hours (in match)
10,263Bombs planted
2,813Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,483
AWP9,396
MAC-105,745
MP95,214
P904,120

Lifetime map wins

6,370dust2
5,988inferno
4,811nuke
2,111vertigo
1,018train
431office
369cbble
97lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

337Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
83.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5954%1.1518.1
Mirage5947%1.1416.3
Inferno5448%1.1516.8
Nuke4154%1.1517.3
Dust24154%1.1215.2
Anubis3145%1.1517.1
Train1560%1.2317.1
Overpass838%1.1817.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
506msReaction time
53.3%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
13.74HE damage / grenade
7.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0115%10 Oct →
anubis13–30.1214%10 Oct →
nuke9–130.0115%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0318%6 Oct →
cache10–20.0110%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0520%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0621%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.027%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.0215%24 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0517%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.057%20 Sept →
debris9–30.127%20 Sept →
ancient8–130.0617%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.0718%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0114%14 Sept →
inferno6–130.0111%14 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.058%14 Sept →
cache15–150.0420%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.015%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.1414%11 Sept →
ancient16–140.0522%7 Sept →
cache13–110.0816%7 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0212%6 Sept →
ancient10–130.0225%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.1220%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0919%3 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0320%31 Aug →
cache13–40.0610%30 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0119%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0322%29 Aug →
ancient10–20.0314%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0310%29 Aug →
cache11–5-0.0226%29 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.086%28 Aug →
ancient16–130.0711%24 Aug →
ancient13–50.0512%24 Aug →
eldorado7–90.0017%24 Aug →
poseidon9–70.037%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.0715%17 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.025%7 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0312%7 Aug →
ancient13–80.0010%7 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0013%7 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0418%7 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0323%4 Aug →
mirage13–20.0117%4 Aug →
dust211–130.0532%4 Aug →
anubis16–140.0417%26 Jul →
cache7–130.0222%26 Jul →
mirage16–120.077%26 Jul →
mirage7–1-0.0221%26 Jul →
nuke13–60.0914%23 Jul →
mirage14–160.0414%23 Jul →
cache10–130.0616%23 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0011%23 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.007%23 Jul →
mirage12–120.0222%20 Jul →
ancient12–12-0.0116%13 Jul →
cache13–30.1018%13 Jul →
mirage6–130.0525%9 Jul →
dust213–5-0.125%9 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0210%7 Jul →
dust213–7-0.038%28 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0112%27 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0023%27 Jun →
nuke13–90.0515%24 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0211%22 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0019%18 Jun →
nuke9–130.0617%14 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0521%14 Jun →
cache13–50.1416%7 Jun →
cache12–120.0920%7 Jun →
cache12–120.0717%7 Jun →
ancient8–130.0214%7 Jun →
cache13–20.0818%7 Jun →
dust213–110.0113%7 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0114%1 Jun →
nuke13–110.1119%1 Jun →
vertigo0–9-0.1225%1 Jun →
nuke9–60.0517%1 Jun →
poseidon9–30.1112%1 Jun →
inferno5–90.0815%1 Jun →
poseidon9–4-0.0720%1 Jun →
poseidon9–20.0650%1 Jun →
ancient13–90.0115%1 Jun →
inferno13–90.0622%1 Jun →
anubis16–130.1517%31 May →
dust213–70.1216%31 May →
dust213–60.0016%25 May →
overpass13–90.0413%25 May →
dust210–130.0120%24 May →
ancient5–130.0214%24 May →
inferno1–130.0818%24 May →
inferno13–100.0629%22 May →
cache3–130.0013%19 May →
cache13–60.0614%19 May →
cache13–70.0712%17 May →
nuke13–110.0813%17 May →
cache11–130.0510%17 May →
cache2–130.0315%13 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.