Jbarnaclez

Jbarnaclez — CS2 Stats

US76561198288971033[U:1:328705305]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,592Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,550Purple band · top ~18.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,075 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 20 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,550 -2,806 21 Jun20 Sept · 11 days played
16,25420,356peak 20,35621 Jun20 Sept
20,594Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,075Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,075
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 126 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,806 below peak (20,356)
  • -28 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,806 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,450 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJbarnaclezFACEITLevel 4 · 1,075 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,550 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,075csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning41
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54415Last 10054%Win rateLLLTWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time504ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy10.7%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 10.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 4 Aug
30%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 9 Jul
367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · mirage, 11 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
82In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS1812667%-0.01
nukeC1761135%-0.01
ancientS1611569%-0.02
cacheA149564%-0.01
anubisA149564%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.02
dust2D93633%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

240Matches
48%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
72.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4957%0.8513.9
Inferno4248%0.8413.1
Mirage3941%0.9112.9
Anubis3757%1.0414.1
Nuke3345%0.8912.8
Dust22635%0.8112.6
Overpass475%0.6210.0
Train425%0.7612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.9%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
497msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
26.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
7.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.8557% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1051% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0610%21 Sept
cache8–13-0.005%20 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0513%20 Sept
cache15–15-0.033%11 Sept
anubis13–60.0216%11 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0121%11 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0616%11 Sept
mirage13–9-0.025%11 Sept
dust29–130.023%7 Sept
nuke13–9-0.067%7 Sept
mirage13–10.036%5 Sept
ancient6–130.1015%5 Sept
cache13–10-0.0212%5 Sept
anubis13–50.0113%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0110%3 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0413%3 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0013%3 Sept
dust23–13-0.0914%3 Sept
ancient13–70.017%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.058%30 Aug
cache2–13-0.016%30 Aug
cache13–40.0217%30 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0013%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0321%29 Aug
ancient10–2-0.0016%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0412%29 Aug
cache11–5-0.0311%29 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0116%24 Aug
ancient13–5-0.067%24 Aug
cache13–2-0.014%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.019%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.069%23 Aug
dust212–12-0.036%23 Aug
cache13–110.0118%23 Aug
dust212–12-0.0519%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0415%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0216%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0814%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0318%7 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0113%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.118%7 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0413%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0715%7 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0323%6 Aug
cache13–30.0521%4 Aug
mirage13–20.1016%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0628%4 Aug
ancient13–50.0724%31 Jul
anubis13–30.018%31 Jul
mirage10–130.017%27 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0312%27 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0211%27 Jul
anubis16–14-0.047%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.074%26 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0413%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0214%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0112%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.0722%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0610%23 Jul
anubis6–13-0.016%23 Jul
anubis10–130.0611%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0022%21 Jul
ancient13–100.0214%20 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0226%20 Jul
inferno9–130.0118%20 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0612%20 Jul
cache13–90.0222%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0222%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0316%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.0118%14 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0119%13 Jul
nuke7–130.0515%12 Jul
ancient16–130.0311%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0211%12 Jul
dust213–110.0311%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0212%12 Jul
anubis13–11-0.044%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.078%9 Jul
dust213–50.0014%9 Jul
inferno6–130.0230%9 Jul
nuke5–130.0013%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0111%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.102%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0023%1 Jul
nuke13–20.0415%1 Jul
anubis7–13-0.017%30 Jun
nuke8–130.0311%29 Jun
cache13–80.0216%29 Jun
dust213–7-0.1113%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0421%27 Jun
mirage13–40.007%27 Jun
nuke4–13-0.008%26 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0711%25 Jun
inferno9–7-0.140%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.1024%21 Jun
nuke3–13-0.066%21 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0323%21 Jun
inferno6–13-0.058%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0418%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0816%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →