weldz

weldz — CS2 Stats

CA76561198306797050[U:1:346531322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

723Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,691Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,748Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,748 +49 29 Aug – 19 Oct · 27 days played
12,57514,515peak 14,51529 Aug19 Oct
14,854Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-08-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 767 below peak (14,515)
  • +478 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,252 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate57.2%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy12.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.371.021.03above
Match win rate46.6%44.7%45.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGweldzFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,748 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time524ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 23 Aug →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 3 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 18 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 16infernoWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2914–1548%0.01
anubisA1810–856%0.01
ancientS1812–667%0.03
mirageS1612–475%0.02
infernoD80–80%-0.01
cacheC73–443%0.01
nuke—43–175%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,763Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
1,518Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
57.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
12.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,240MVPs
760Hours (in match)
1,849Bombs planted
504Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,600dust2
1,363inferno
498nuke
364vertigo
103train
58cbble
47lake
33office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

194Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
79.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24542%1.1515.4
Mirage4062%1.2316.4
Ancient2650%1.1316.3
Anubis2454%1.4916.8
Inferno1644%1.0116.1
Nuke862%0.8313.1
Cache30%0.9114.0
Train2100%1.2219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
528msReaction time
54.0%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
6.48HE damage / grenade
16.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.4994% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0617%3 Nov →
mirage7–130.1016%1 Nov →
dust213–100.0417%1 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0216%1 Nov →
mirage7–2-0.0015%1 Nov →
mirage13–90.0434%1 Nov →
mirage10–130.0124%29 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0522%29 Oct →
anubis13–100.0319%29 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0612%29 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0319%24 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0516%24 Oct →
ancient13–60.0123%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.0623%22 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0314%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0621%21 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0226%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0112%20 Oct →
anubis10–130.0517%20 Oct →
dust213–70.0317%19 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0523%19 Oct →
anubis16–140.0628%19 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0223%18 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0213%18 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0129%18 Oct →
dust27–130.0725%18 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0326%16 Oct →
dust27–130.0119%16 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0715%15 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0711%14 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0120%14 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0621%13 Oct →
anubis19–15-0.029%13 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0215%12 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0431%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.057%11 Oct →
ancient19–170.0313%11 Oct →
inferno6–130.0132%11 Oct →
mirage13–110.0414%11 Oct →
anubis13–90.0313%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0016%9 Oct →
mirage13–30.1122%9 Oct →
ancient13–110.1220%8 Oct →
inferno13–160.0431%8 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0224%8 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0419%7 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0213%7 Oct →
ancient13–80.1015%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.1021%4 Oct →
inferno3–100.0631%4 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0328%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.0917%3 Oct →
ancient10–130.0224%3 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0614%3 Oct →
ancient13–50.0723%3 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0417%2 Oct →
ancient13–30.0524%2 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0226%2 Oct →
dust27–130.0122%1 Oct →
dust213–30.0822%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0226%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0429%29 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0125%29 Sept →
ancient13–50.0621%28 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0016%28 Sept →
ancient13–70.0025%28 Sept →
dust213–90.0226%27 Sept →
dust213–10.0826%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0214%27 Sept →
anubis13–110.0113%27 Sept →
nuke16–140.0421%27 Sept →
dust21–130.0233%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0212%25 Sept →
ancient13–70.0223%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0121%17 Sept →
dust27–130.0113%16 Sept →
cache13–40.0021%16 Sept →
cache13–80.0222%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0218%14 Sept →
ancient9–130.0217%13 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0219%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0323%12 Sept →
anubis14–160.0517%12 Sept →
dust213–80.1022%11 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0029%11 Sept →
ancient13–100.0027%11 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0311%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0120%9 Sept →
dust213–30.1131%7 Sept →
cache3–130.0119%6 Sept →
cache13–60.1121%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0646%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0229%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0124%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0221%29 Aug →
anubis16–190.0319%28 Aug →
dust213–70.0421%23 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0322%23 Aug →
dust213–00.1935%23 Aug →
anubis13–100.0719%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.