Testari - Liggett & Myers

Testari - Liggett & Myers — CS2 Stats

FI76561198251879806[U:1:291614078]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,185Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,938Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,247Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48096 of 230509 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,149 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,247 → 22,247
0Faceit ELO · 2,149 → 2,149
+20Tracked matches · now 2,185
+3.5ppWin rate · 44.8% → 48.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,247 -4,386 3 Jul10 Sept · 18 days played
21,49726,633peak 26,6333 Jul10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,149 +0 29 Aug10 Sept · 3 observations
2,1492,149peak 2,14929 Aug10 Sept
26,898Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,149Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,149
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 351 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,386 below peak (26,633)
  • +626 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,753 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.0%48.3%51.0%9.0% short
Shot accuracy14.1%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.071.09above
Match win rate51.4%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTestari - Liggett & MyersFACEITLevel 9 · 2,149 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,247 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,149csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning63
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time576ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 12–4 · fachwerk, 10 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · nuke, 5 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 0–8 · anubis, 20 Jul
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
614In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2081240%-0.00
infernoA1710759%0.01
nukeB157847%-0.01
anubisD1441029%-0.01
cacheA117464%0.00
mirageC114736%-0.00
dust2D62433%-0.03
overpass31233%-0.01
fachwerk110100%0.17
shelter110100%-0.02
boulder110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

140,109Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,810Matches
51.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
42.0%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
18,523MVPs
2,714Hours (in match)
8,257Bombs planted
1,776Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,275
AWP12,328
SG 5532,628
MP92,576
MAC-102,129

Lifetime map wins

10,592inferno
7,456dust2
6,006nuke
5,256vertigo
4,169train
1,066office
853cbble
348lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

990Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12756%1.0615.7
Ancient7751%1.1015.9
Nuke7262%1.1215.6
Inferno6248%1.1116.3
Anubis5345%1.1515.2
Dust24751%1.1116.0
Vertigo3352%1.0615.6
Cache1968%1.0515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
566msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
11.10HE damage / grenade
8.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0619%14 Sept
inferno13–80.0718%13 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0118%11 Sept
nuke13–00.0924%11 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1017%10 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0322%10 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0116%9 Sept
nuke0–2-0.1650%5 Sept
inferno13–10.049%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0024%1 Sept
cache13–90.0216%30 Aug
mirage19–170.0213%30 Aug
cache13–90.0117%30 Aug
cache13–10.078%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0026%29 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0014%29 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0611%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0319%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0715%14 Aug
ancient4–5-0.040%14 Aug
dust213–4-0.088%14 Aug
mirage13–160.0125%12 Aug
dust217–190.0116%11 Aug
nuke11–130.0922%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0715%9 Aug
anubis13–8-0.037%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.009%7 Aug
ancient10–130.0117%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0115%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0215%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.079%3 Aug
ancient13–80.0115%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0214%2 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0215%31 Jul
nuke3–130.008%31 Jul
cache13–1-0.0214%31 Jul
mirage19–160.0129%30 Jul
nuke13–50.0322%30 Jul
cache12–16-0.0422%29 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0033%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0610%29 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0113%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0516%29 Jul
ancient16–13-0.018%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0121%27 Jul
anubis13–50.1140%27 Jul
nuke13–100.0217%24 Jul
anubis12–160.0331%24 Jul
nuke13–40.0124%23 Jul
anubis7–130.0121%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0515%23 Jul
anubis16–130.0513%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0618%21 Jul
cache10–13-0.0022%20 Jul
anubis0–8-0.160%20 Jul
ancient8–130.0122%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0424%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.0523%17 Jul
dust214–16-0.0114%17 Jul
anubis7–1-0.038%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0724%17 Jul
anubis15–150.0320%17 Jul
cache13–80.0715%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0441%16 Jul
nuke13–100.0619%16 Jul
inferno13–60.0919%16 Jul
ancient6–13-0.019%16 Jul
nuke13–80.0119%16 Jul
cache13–6-0.0015%10 Jul
ancient13–60.0415%10 Jul
cache13–10-0.0018%10 Jul
fachwerk12–40.1721%10 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0211%10 Jul
boulder13–10.0815%10 Jul
nuke13–60.0011%9 Jul
ancient11–130.0319%9 Jul
inferno13–80.0519%9 Jul
dust27–13-0.0230%9 Jul
inferno13–50.0412%9 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0131%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0124%8 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0219%7 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0516%7 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0126%7 Jul
anubis10–130.0419%6 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0317%6 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0026%6 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0721%6 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0616%6 Jul
nuke6–13-0.1111%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0921%6 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0722%5 Jul
inferno13–80.1220%5 Jul
ancient16–130.067%5 Jul
dust213–7-0.0322%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0113%4 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0425%4 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0118%3 Jul
overpass14–16-0.0123%3 Jul
overpass5–130.0229%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →