omses

omses — CS2 Stats

FI76561198214601057[U:1:254335329]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,708Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#28703 of 230315 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,136 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 1 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,083 -550 11 Apr9 May · 12 days played
24,08325,000peak 25,00011 Apr9 May
25,317Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,136Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,136
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 364 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGomsesFACEITLevel 10 · 2,136 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,136csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning69
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.1
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time573ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 3 Aug
32%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 19 Apr
414msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB22101245%0.05
ancientA1810856%0.02
mirageB178947%-0.00
nukeB147750%0.01
anubisA116555%0.02
vertigoS97278%0.03
infernoC73443%0.01
poseidon110100%0.13
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,659Matches
51%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
90.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6040%1.1718.2
Nuke5646%1.2416.7
Ancient5058%1.2617.2
Anubis4349%1.2519.5
Vertigo3765%1.5621.7
Cache1850%1.6319.6
Inferno1436%1.2217.0
Dust21060%1.2416.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
574msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
62.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
5.99HE damage / grenade
8.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4897 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1407% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.0416%17 Sept
vertigo13–100.0316%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0120%14 Sept
anubis13–30.0813%12 Sept
cache11–130.0625%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0514%8 Sept
anubis13–80.0018%8 Sept
nuke13–50.0316%6 Sept
cache13–160.0413%2 Sept
vertigo13–110.0113%2 Sept
cache8–13-0.0017%2 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0121%2 Sept
ancient16–140.0518%30 Aug
nuke8–130.0326%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0114%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0613%26 Aug
vertigo16–190.0718%26 Aug
poseidon9–60.1315%25 Aug
inferno9–20.0418%25 Aug
cache9–130.019%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0211%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0921%20 Aug
cache9–130.0520%20 Aug
vertigo13–110.0514%9 Aug
vertigo13–50.0418%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0415%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0815%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0815%7 Aug
vertigo13–50.0214%7 Aug
cache7–13-0.027%7 Aug
ancient7–13-0.054%6 Aug
vertigo13–90.0122%6 Aug
cache13–50.2017%3 Aug
ancient10–130.0313%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0123%31 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0013%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0415%31 Jul
ancient13–60.1120%28 Jul
mirage14–160.0310%28 Jul
ancient16–130.078%27 Jul
cache9–130.0219%27 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0513%27 Jul
cache13–110.0623%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0718%26 Jul
cache13–50.0328%26 Jul
anubis7–13-0.008%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0116%23 Jul
cache13–90.0929%22 Jul
cache13–10.1115%22 Jul
ancient13–160.0723%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0622%19 Jul
cache12–120.0224%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0715%13 Jul
ancient3–130.0317%13 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0212%13 Jul
ancient13–110.0317%11 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0615%11 Jul
cache13–90.0416%11 Jul
cache13–90.0017%11 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0921%9 May
inferno10–130.0213%9 May
cache12–12-0.0223%9 May
cache13–20.1513%8 May
cache6–13-0.0013%8 May
cache13–100.1119%8 May
nuke13–80.0618%3 May
cache13–10.1019%3 May
cache11–130.0218%3 May
nuke11–130.0218%3 May
mirage9–13-0.0425%2 May
inferno13–30.0817%2 May
mirage8–13-0.0629%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0110%26 Apr
anubis13–50.0415%26 Apr
anubis14–160.049%25 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0313%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0713%24 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0226%24 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0419%23 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0114%23 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0420%23 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0423%20 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0332%19 Apr
overpass13–90.0328%18 Apr
nuke7–130.0626%18 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0220%14 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0414%12 Apr
vertigo13–110.0226%11 Apr
nuke13–80.1021%11 Apr
ancient13–90.1021%6 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0319%4 Apr
ancient14–160.0616%4 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0120%3 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0512%3 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0524%3 Apr
nuke13–110.1120%3 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0213%15 Mar
anubis13–80.0318%15 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0527%1 Mar
anubis13–80.0118%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →