Mr. Begining — CS2 Stats

FI76561198071943002[U:1:111677274]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,224Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,243Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,479Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17745 of 59566 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,901 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	61.4%	48.4%	51.7%	above
Shot accuracy	12.1%	13.2%	13.8%	1.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.59	1.08	1.09	above
Match win rate	49.3%	47.0%	48.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning60

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression8.6

Utility6.0

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning6.0

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time516ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy19.0%−5.5%

first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — inferno 9–5

13–0Biggest win — warden

6Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 14cacheWeakest map · 23% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	14	11–3	79%	0.08
nuke	D	14	4–10	29%	0.00
cache	D	13	3–10	23%	0.04
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.06
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
vertigo	S	7	5–2	71%	0.16
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	0.08
mirage	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04
poseidon	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.09
sanctum	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
warden	—	4	2–2	50%	0.06
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.15
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.15
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

98,908Lifetime kills

1.59K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players

3,389Matches

49.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

61.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players

12.1%Shot accuracy

9,378MVPs

1,305Hours (in match)

2,004Bombs planted

1,036Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,634

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,252

P2000 / USP-S3,910

MP93,546

Glock-183,036

Desert Eagle3,005

AWP2,641

Galil AR2,057

MAC-101,600

P2501,161

Lifetime map wins

6,106inferno

5,576nuke

2,128dust2

1,737vertigo

1,664train

111italy

108office

38safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

422Matches

52%Win rate

1.31Avg K/D

93.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	76	67%	1.58	20.8
Inferno	76	43%	1.30	18.5
Mirage	73	47%	1.19	17.7
Anubis	70	50%	1.23	18.5
Dust2	45	38%	1.21	18.2
Ancient	26	58%	1.31	20.2
Vertigo	12	50%	1.19	18.4
Overpass	11	73%	1.17	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy

44.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

48.3%Spray accuracy

86.3%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

511msReaction time

38.5%T opening success

58.1%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

12.11HE damage / grenade

10.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.4795% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–9	0.06	16%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.06	15%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.07	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	17%	27 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	8%	27 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	23%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	18%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.17	16%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.09	8%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.06	12%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	32%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.09	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.13	14%	16 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	17%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.06	14%	28 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.10	24%	28 Jul →
boulder	9–13	-0.02	9%	28 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	14%	24 Jul →
cache	5–2	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	22%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.03	17%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.01	8%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.03	15%	26 May →
vertigo	9–3	0.35	35%	24 May →
poseidon	9–7	0.13	25%	24 May →
nuke	3–9	-0.03	23%	24 May →
inferno	9–5	0.35	35%	24 May →
overpass	9–4	0.20	44%	21 May →
nuke	4–9	-0.11	12%	21 May →
inferno	9–5	0.14	13%	21 May →
vertigo	8–8	0.09	20%	21 May →
sanctum	8–8	-0.01	20%	21 May →
poseidon	3–9	-0.06	16%	21 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	23%	10 May →
cache	11–13	0.09	13%	10 May →
cache	10–13	-0.05	16%	3 May →
cache	13–6	0.03	18%	3 May →
cache	11–13	0.12	20%	29 Apr →
cache	6–13	0.07	27%	29 Apr →
cache	9–13	0.07	19%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.16	19%	29 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.07	25%	24 Apr →
ancient	9–13	0.17	19%	24 Apr →
dust2	1–13	0.07	19%	24 Apr →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	33%	24 Apr →
poseidon	9–5	0.00	50%	22 Apr →
vertigo	7–9	0.01	16%	22 Apr →
sanctum	9–3	0.16	13%	22 Apr →
poseidon	9–6	0.07	26%	22 Apr →
inferno	9–6	0.02	23%	22 Apr →
warden	13–2	0.08	15%	15 Apr →
warden	1–4	0.10	20%	15 Apr →
office	9–13	0.03	33%	15 Apr →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	16%	15 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.04	11%	12 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	7%	12 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.06	20%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.07	12%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.05	12%	12 Apr →
warden	13–0	0.08	36%	8 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.03	13%	7 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.02	11%	5 Apr →
stronghold	13–11	0.15	24%	5 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.12	18%	5 Apr →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	29%	5 Apr →
vertigo	9–6	0.31	50%	5 Apr →
inferno	2–9	-0.06	22%	4 Apr →
overpass	5–9	0.00	21%	4 Apr →
train	13–5	0.15	29%	2 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.08	16%	2 Apr →
overpass	5–9	-0.05	17%	26 Mar →
sanctum	9–7	-0.03	18%	26 Mar →
vertigo	9–6	0.06	43%	26 Mar →
inferno	9–3	0.11	40%	26 Mar →
poseidon	8–8	0.02	44%	26 Mar →
nuke	9–4	0.08	14%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.09	21%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–6	0.07	18%	16 Mar →
nuke	6–13	0.05	21%	16 Mar →
ancient	12–12	0.12	27%	16 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	17%	16 Mar →
anubis	9–13	0.01	16%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.04	30%	11 Mar →
nuke	2–9	-0.16	17%	10 Mar →
inferno	9–7	-0.03	26%	10 Mar →
overpass	9–0	0.29	23%	10 Mar →
vertigo	9–5	0.19	31%	10 Mar →
sanctum	9–7	0.08	10%	10 Mar →
poseidon	7–9	0.05	38%	10 Mar →
anubis	13–7	0.08	20%	6 Mar →
vertigo	13–5	0.12	24%	6 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.01	26%	6 Mar →
warden	5–13	-0.00	18%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.15	29%	5 Mar →
italy	5–13	0.05	11%	4 Mar →