Aurora ฅ՞•ﻌ•՞ฅ

Aurora ฅ՞•ﻌ•՞ฅ — CS2 Stats

76561198067459194[U:1:107193466]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,013Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,235Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,306Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62599 of 247839 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,306 +2,829 2 Aug – 30 Sept · 27 days played
18,05221,306peak 21,3062 Aug30 Sept
22,059Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,306
  • +1,307 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,694 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches62+4
Win rate83%50%+33pp
K/D3.491.00+2.49
Headshot %76%42%+34pp

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; previous 18 Sep 2026 → 22 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches52——
Win rate54%——
K/D2.35——
Headshot %72%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate54.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy15.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.051.060.10 short
Match win rate40.8%45.7%46.3%5.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAurora ฅ՞•ﻌ•՞ฅFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,306 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +98ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility3.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time553ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 4 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 5–3 · anubis, 31 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 20mirageWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2311–1248%-0.01
cacheS2013–765%-0.00
nukeA2012–860%-0.01
ancientA148–657%-0.02
anubisA116–555%-0.03
mirageB115–645%-0.01
dust2—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

154,555Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
7,761Matches
40.8%Match win rate
54.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13,547MVPs
3,507Hours (in match)
10,315Bombs planted
1,388Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,631
FAMAS7,715
P2506,507
MP74,956
MAC-103,296
AWP2,170

Lifetime map wins

12,466inferno
8,750nuke
6,524train
6,048dust2
1,983cbble
1,474vertigo
56lake
37office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,027Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
69.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8255%0.8113.6
Mirage7536%0.7713.2
Nuke6959%0.8713.4
Ancient5847%0.7011.5
Anubis4762%0.8213.5
Vertigo2433%0.7513.7
Overpass1662%0.7611.8
Dust21362%0.7411.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
577msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.29HE damage / grenade
3.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3765 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9099% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0221%30 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0121%30 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0024%30 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0329%30 Sept →
cache13–70.0224%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0318%28 Sept →
nuke14–160.0616%9 Sept →
cache13–7-0.035%9 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0820%9 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.037%9 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0620%7 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.110%7 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.1113%7 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0217%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0117%7 Sept →
inferno15–150.0311%7 Sept →
cache16–130.0616%7 Sept →
nuke13–60.0923%7 Sept →
mirage13–20.0614%7 Sept →
inferno13–40.0020%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0430%6 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0615%6 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0225%6 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.1110%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.0515%4 Sept →
cache13–70.0514%4 Sept →
inferno13–60.0320%4 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0711%4 Sept →
nuke13–20.0116%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0117%4 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0211%4 Sept →
cache9–130.0327%4 Sept →
inferno13–40.1421%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0810%3 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0023%3 Sept →
cache10–130.054%3 Sept →
anubis13–20.0522%3 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0210%2 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0412%2 Sept →
cache13–40.0527%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.0219%2 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0017%2 Sept →
mirage13–30.0114%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0125%31 Aug →
inferno2–130.0334%31 Aug →
anubis5–3-0.0544%31 Aug →
mirage6–130.0110%31 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0014%31 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0314%30 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.089%30 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0412%30 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0217%30 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0719%30 Aug →
cache13–60.0112%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.0423%29 Aug →
mirage13–50.0213%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.1021%29 Aug →
nuke9–130.0134%29 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0514%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0133%26 Aug →
nuke13–20.1021%26 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0524%26 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0623%26 Aug →
cache13–60.0121%23 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.006%21 Aug →
inferno16–140.0121%21 Aug →
anubis13–60.0020%21 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0118%21 Aug →
cache9–130.0520%21 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0717%19 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0112%19 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0615%17 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.1019%17 Aug →
ancient13–10.0127%16 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0413%16 Aug →
inferno13–60.1026%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0121%15 Aug →
inferno22–19-0.028%15 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0413%14 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0519%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0214%14 Aug →
nuke13–30.0526%14 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0429%14 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0510%12 Aug →
ancient13–50.0512%12 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0620%12 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0223%8 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
mirage7–130.0226%8 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0316%8 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0916%7 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0914%7 Aug →
cache13–110.0231%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0217%7 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0811%5 Aug →
inferno13–70.0220%5 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0716%5 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0710%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0521%2 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0411%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.