WaRninG !?

WaRninG !? — CS2 Stats

VA76561198024528539[U:1:64262811]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,700Tracked matches62%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,356Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,673Blue band · top ~40.7% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,673 -3,771 4 Jun – 1 Oct · 18 days played
9,99916,444peak 16,4444 Jun1 Oct
16,853Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,407Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,407
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,771 below peak (16,444)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,327 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate56.2%41.9%44.3%above
Shot accuracy10.6%9.6%11.9%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.880.981.030.16 short
Match win rate46.8%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWaRninG !?PREMIER12,673 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,407csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning54
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time593ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 11 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 7–2 · cache, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2413–1154%-0.03
mirageB2111–1052%-0.02
nukeA1810–856%-0.03
infernoB126–650%-0.02
anubisS118–373%-0.03
dust2C73–443%-0.03
cacheC73–443%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,487Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
4,640Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
56.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Blue band
10.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
8,580MVPs
2,356Hours (in match)
3,869Bombs planted
749Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,313
AWP14,963
MAC-102,869
Tec-91,619
FAMAS1,517
P2501,253

Lifetime map wins

5,946dust2
3,947inferno
2,923nuke
491vertigo
471cbble
469train
15militia
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

664Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
76.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23848%0.8814.5
Ancient12051%0.9415.8
Anubis8450%0.8414.5
Inferno7651%0.9515.4
Dust26650%1.0615.6
Nuke3161%0.8214.3
Overpass1471%1.2619.8
Train1136%0.6812.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
580msReaction time
48.6%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
7.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4497% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0115%1 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0514%1 Oct →
ancient16–140.0316%1 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0610%1 Oct →
nuke13–30.0313%1 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%30 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0414%30 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0511%30 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0516%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.028%29 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0215%29 Sept →
mirage16–130.0416%29 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.028%29 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0428%29 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0418%28 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0111%28 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0010%28 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0416%28 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0421%28 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0323%27 Sept →
mirage13–80.0518%27 Sept →
inferno13–50.0213%27 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.037%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0314%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0815%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0419%27 Sept →
dust213–6-0.018%27 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0013%26 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0512%26 Sept →
anubis13–40.0011%26 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0310%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0010%26 Sept →
cache13–60.0116%25 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0117%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.018%25 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0212%24 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0410%22 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0523%22 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0714%22 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0811%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0711%21 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0011%21 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0711%20 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.073%20 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0119%20 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.049%19 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0222%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0919%16 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0218%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.038%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0924%15 Sept →
cache5–13-0.077%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0319%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0125%15 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0416%14 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0924%14 Sept →
inferno7–130.0220%14 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0131%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0112%14 Sept →
ancient13–20.0618%14 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
mirage13–90.0018%13 Sept →
anubis13–40.0214%13 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0115%13 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.039%13 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0712%13 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.059%12 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0312%12 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0112%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0122%12 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0514%11 Sept →
nuke13–20.0717%11 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0019%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0617%11 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0615%11 Sept →
mirage13–20.0235%11 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.029%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0118%10 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.095%10 Sept →
ancient13–10.0620%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0515%10 Sept →
cache7–2-0.108%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0311%10 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0710%6 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0713%2 Aug →
cache7–130.0232%2 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.084%2 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0216%1 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0214%1 Aug →
dust23–13-0.067%1 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0224%1 Aug →
mirage13–100.049%5 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0232%5 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0219%5 Jun →
inferno13–160.0521%5 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0318%4 Jun →
inferno13–10.0330%4 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0620%4 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0219%4 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0212%4 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.