ReCoiL-_- — CS2 Stats

76561197983245016[U:1:22979288]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

727Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since

880Hours in CS66Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,417Pink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8902 of 22008 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	51.1%	44.2%	44.9%	above
Shot accuracy	0.0%	11.2%	11.8%	11.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.02	1.04	1.04	0.02 short
Match win rate	48.6%	45.3%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning54

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression7.8

Utility3.7

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning5.4

Utility3.7

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time588ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — anubis 6–0

13–2Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	39	22–17	56%	0.00
cache	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.03
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.00
inferno	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.03
mirage	S	9	7–2	78%	-0.02
nuke	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

12,944Lifetime kills

1.02K/D

780Matches

48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players

51.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players

0.0%Shot accuracy

1,661MVPs

363Hours (in match)

980Bombs planted

172Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,612

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,710

Galil AR990

AWP707

FAMAS692

P2000 / USP-S691

Glock-18611

Knife198

MAC-10134

MP9123

Lifetime map wins

2,600dust2

799inferno

707nuke

100train

43vertigo

30office

1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches

46%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

78.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	75	44%	1.00	15.2
Anubis	32	62%	1.15	16.1
Ancient	23	43%	1.03	15.2
Cache	20	50%	1.19	16.9
Mirage	16	25%	0.94	15.3
Inferno	11	36%	1.06	18.0
Nuke	9	67%	1.42	17.6
Overpass	4	25%	0.88	14.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy

31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.9%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

590msReaction time

32.1%T opening success

53.6%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

6.77HE damage / grenade

5.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4108 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.0812% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	10–13	0.01	12%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	26%	29 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	27%	28 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	16%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	26%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	30%	28 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	26%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	20%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	29%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	21%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	24%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	33%	23 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.04	8%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	16%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.04	28%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	27%	23 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	18%	23 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.08	25%	23 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	11%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	20%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.01	28%	22 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	7%	22 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	16%	22 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.09	27%	22 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.05	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	24%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	27%	20 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	22%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.07	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	17%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	53%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	17%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	24%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	38%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	35%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–7	-0.01	18%	16 Aug →
vertigo	9–3	-0.06	9%	15 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.20	33%	15 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.06	14%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	22%	15 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	34%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–2	-0.04	27%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–1	-0.05	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	39%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.00	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	22%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	32%	13 Aug →
anubis	6–0	0.19	25%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	38%	13 Aug →
anubis	19–17	-0.02	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	23%	12 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	29%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.08	31%	9 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.04	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.11	5%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	11%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	31%	9 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	10%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.06	27%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	17%	9 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.02	11%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	19%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.02	18%	8 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	13%	8 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.02	25%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.09	26%	6 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.04	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	20%	3 Aug →