....

.... — CS2 Stats

76561199161390411[U:1:1201124683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

754Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
955Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,041Top 50% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51006 of 234149 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 958 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,041 +5,560 11 Jul21 Sept · 27 days played
16,48122,041peak 22,04111 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 958 +0 3 Sept21 Sept · 2 observations
958958peak 9583 Sept21 Sept
22,690Peak Premier in tracked matches
958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 958
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,041
  • +2,735 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,959 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate54.0%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.4%11.3%12.0%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.060.991.02above
Match win rate50.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG....FACEITLevel 4 · 958 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,041 · Pink bandPEAK ELO958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning72
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59392Last 10059%Win rateLWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.09 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.2
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning7.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time559ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 19 Sept
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · cache, 19 Sept
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · dust2, 19 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
133In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29181162%0.01
cacheA2314961%0.00
anubisS139469%0.02
infernoC125742%-0.01
ancientA117464%0.02
mirageB63350%0.02
nukeB63350%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,561Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
835Matches
50.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
54.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
2,022MVPs
406Hours (in match)
1,015Bombs planted
236Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,095dust2
1,125inferno
695nuke
423vertigo
235train
21office
8ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
80.6ADR
70%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.9215.0
Inferno10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
554msReaction time
62.1%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
11.34HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4661 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–160.0630%20 Sept
anubis13–110.0820%20 Sept
dust213–100.0829%20 Sept
dust213–80.1819%20 Sept
mirage13–60.0418%20 Sept
inferno13–30.0739%19 Sept
anubis13–100.0428%19 Sept
dust213–100.0927%19 Sept
ancient13–30.2917%19 Sept
mirage16–140.1634%19 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0324%19 Sept
cache13–9-0.0145%19 Sept
cache6–130.0621%13 Sept
inferno4–13-0.1111%12 Sept
dust216–140.0320%12 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0633%11 Sept
cache13–90.0528%7 Sept
cache13–60.1812%7 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0017%7 Sept
dust213–30.1319%31 Aug
dust24–13-0.0116%31 Aug
inferno12–160.0128%27 Aug
cache10–13-0.0121%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0324%27 Aug
cache6–130.0120%9 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0020%1 Aug
cache13–50.0432%1 Aug
cache12–16-0.0426%1 Aug
anubis7–130.0729%1 Aug
cache6–130.0332%29 Jul
dust29–130.0324%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0225%26 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0410%26 Jul
dust213–100.0825%26 Jul
cache9–130.0027%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0217%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0825%26 Jul
anubis16–140.0219%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0119%26 Jul
dust213–4-0.0212%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0818%25 Jul
dust26–4-0.0115%25 Jul
cache16–14-0.0317%25 Jul
dust25–13-0.0417%25 Jul
cache13–9-0.0127%23 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0615%23 Jul
inferno13–30.029%23 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0221%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0114%19 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0512%19 Jul
cache15–15-0.0116%19 Jul
anubis13–40.0321%19 Jul
ancient16–140.0618%18 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0414%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.089%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0323%18 Jul
dust213–6-0.0025%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0618%18 Jul
dust213–10.0213%18 Jul
cache16–14-0.0510%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0415%17 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0018%17 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0421%16 Jul
dust213–11-0.0217%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0613%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0116%15 Jul
anubis13–90.0315%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0114%15 Jul
anubis13–110.0118%14 Jul
dust213–60.0124%14 Jul
nuke13–70.0421%13 Jul
inferno13–40.1113%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0311%13 Jul
dust213–90.0527%13 Jul
anubis15–150.0113%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.089%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0534%12 Jul
ancient13–60.1033%12 Jul
cache4–13-0.0915%12 Jul
dust213–90.0312%12 Jul
cache13–80.0111%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0216%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0420%12 Jul
dust213–20.0124%12 Jul
dust27–130.0111%11 Jul
dust213–7-0.0711%11 Jul
cache13–40.0920%11 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0410%11 Jul
cache13–7-0.0027%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0519%11 Jul
inferno13–40.0225%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0320%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0317%11 Jul
cache13–9-0.0113%11 Jul
anubis13–80.0815%11 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0618%10 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0324%10 Jul
dust213–30.0611%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.0727%10 Jul
ancient13–5-0.058%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →