Zero

Zero — CS2 Stats

NO76561197972441447[U:1:12175719]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,171Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,661Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,906 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,906 → 1,906
+9Tracked matches · now 2,171
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 9 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,274 -423 9 Apr6 Jun · 25 days played
25,02427,022peak 27,0229 Apr6 Jun
27,022Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,906Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,906
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate35.0%46.8%48.3%13.2% short
Shot accuracy12.1%13.0%13.2%1.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.07meets
Match win rate44.7%46.3%46.9%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeroFACEITLevel 8 · 1,906 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,906csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time594ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy12.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 27 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 20 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · dust2, 21 May
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 21 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2011955%-0.01
nukeB178947%-0.02
infernoB178947%-0.01
mirageD1441029%-0.01
dust2B136746%-0.01
anubisS96367%-0.00
cacheD72529%0.02
overpass2020%-0.02
debris1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

115,597Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
5,840Matches
44.7%Match win rate
35.0%Headshot %
12.1%Shot accuracy
12,113MVPs
2,470Hours (in match)
5,772Bombs planted
1,228Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,615
AWP13,144
MAC-103,795
MP93,060
Tec-92,035

Lifetime map wins

12,473inferno
6,715dust2
5,183nuke
2,457vertigo
900train
463cbble
157lake
53safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

582Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
80.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9755%1.1217.5
Mirage9242%0.9315.2
Anubis6047%0.9715.3
Nuke5961%1.0215.6
Inferno5467%1.0716.7
Overpass2568%1.2417.2
Dust22446%0.9713.7
Vertigo1942%0.9517.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
587msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
14.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8758% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.0079% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0213%14 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0811%14 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0114%7 Sept
nuke6–13-0.038%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.029%3 Sept
ancient19–15-0.0214%3 Sept
anubis9–130.0720%1 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0212%31 Aug
dust213–10-0.0310%31 Aug
anubis13–3-0.049%31 Aug
inferno13–10-0.068%21 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0116%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.079%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0417%16 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0017%16 Aug
debris7–9-0.066%16 Aug
inferno12–160.0217%13 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0527%1 Aug
dust213–60.129%27 Jul
ancient10–130.0210%27 Jul
dust211–130.0312%25 Jul
inferno13–9-0.025%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0515%2 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0512%2 Jul
inferno13–100.0318%2 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0810%2 Jul
anubis13–16-0.029%2 Jul
inferno9–13-0.048%28 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0624%28 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0510%25 Jun
dust28–13-0.0420%17 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0114%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0211%8 Jun
anubis13–50.0212%8 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0211%8 Jun
ancient22–18-0.0114%7 Jun
overpass7–130.017%6 Jun
dust25–13-0.0313%6 Jun
cache13–9-0.0215%4 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0212%4 Jun
ancient5–130.0116%4 Jun
inferno13–9-0.073%4 Jun
anubis13–90.0312%1 Jun
dust213–8-0.009%1 Jun
mirage13–70.0127%1 Jun
ancient13–160.0217%1 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0021%31 May
inferno16–13-0.0012%29 May
nuke13–5-0.009%29 May
mirage15–150.0722%28 May
ancient13–80.0318%26 May
mirage10–13-0.0526%26 May
nuke16–14-0.0513%25 May
ancient11–13-0.0512%25 May
ancient13–70.0418%25 May
nuke10–13-0.0619%25 May
cache11–130.0021%22 May
cache12–120.0115%22 May
inferno9–13-0.0311%21 May
dust213–20.0122%21 May
nuke11–130.017%18 May
anubis13–7-0.0224%18 May
inferno3–13-0.0416%18 May
nuke13–70.0023%18 May
inferno13–20.0825%18 May
dust28–13-0.0118%14 May
nuke8–13-0.0614%14 May
mirage9–13-0.015%14 May
nuke3–13-0.0213%14 May
nuke7–130.0217%13 May
inferno8–13-0.0610%13 May
cache12–120.0121%11 May
cache13–50.0324%11 May
mirage11–130.0115%11 May
dust213–50.0319%8 May
mirage16–14-0.0114%7 May
inferno11–130.0219%6 May
nuke13–11-0.0310%4 May
ancient8–130.0417%4 May
cache10–130.0718%4 May
inferno13–90.0120%30 Apr
cache11–130.0117%29 Apr
ancient8–130.0211%29 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0612%28 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0416%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0912%27 Apr
nuke13–60.0011%24 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0512%22 Apr
dust24–13-0.0514%22 Apr
ancient13–80.0020%20 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0435%20 Apr
mirage15–15-0.049%20 Apr
nuke11–13-0.029%16 Apr
mirage16–140.0415%16 Apr
ancient13–60.003%16 Apr
dust213–2-0.0118%13 Apr
inferno13–2-0.0112%13 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0212%9 Apr
ancient0–9-0.040%9 Apr
anubis13–30.079%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →