Kirr

Kirr — CS2 Stats

NO76561198009782627[U:1:49516899]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,062Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,090Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,906 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,906 → 1,906
+11Tracked matches · now 2,062
+2.2ppWin rate · 44.4% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,349 -117 24 Feb – 29 May · 21 days played
21,04423,614peak 23,61424 Feb29 May
Faceit ELO: 1,906 +0 13 Sept – 23 Sept · 2 observations
1,9061,906peak 1,90613 Sept23 Sept
23,735Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,906Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-02-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,906
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.7%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy14.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.12 short
Match win rate48.0%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKirrFACEITLevel 7 · 1,906 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,906csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateWWLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility8.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch7.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contributionReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility8.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time584ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 23 May →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 16 Aug →
383msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 21 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 2 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2612–1446%-0.01
ancientA2212–1055%0.00
infernoC166–1038%0.01
anubisB136–746%0.00
dust2A95–456%-0.01
nukeD62–433%0.00
cache—42–250%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.02
debris—10–10%0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,783Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,816Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
11,794MVPs
2,954Hours (in match)
7,867Bombs planted
1,194Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,510
AWP6,147
FAMAS2,223
MP92,091
MAC-101,940
P2501,755

Lifetime map wins

9,752inferno
4,185dust2
2,933nuke
1,435train
1,368cbble
760vertigo
69lake
55shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

432Matches
54%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
82.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3661%1.0215.5
Ancient3040%1.0116.1
Anubis2868%1.2217.3
Nuke1753%1.1816.5
Inferno1553%0.8812.9
Dust21436%0.9514.4
Vertigo560%0.9717.2
Train367%1.0817.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
578msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
11.92HE damage / grenade
20.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6919% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0531%26 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0112%26 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0013%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0416%2 Oct →
nuke10–130.0523%28 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.049%28 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0514%28 Sept →
ancient13–20.0522%28 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0924%24 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0415%24 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0621%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0520%22 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0012%22 Sept →
mirage10–130.0323%21 Sept →
ancient19–220.0421%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0321%7 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0423%7 Sept →
mirage16–130.0116%7 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0025%28 Aug →
dust213–2-0.077%28 Aug →
anubis16–120.0619%28 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0010%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0112%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.0012%24 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0326%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0113%24 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0422%21 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0123%21 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0612%21 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0222%16 Aug →
nuke4–130.0444%16 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0520%16 Aug →
debris7–90.0227%16 Aug →
cache8–130.0323%22 Jul →
inferno13–40.0431%22 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0126%14 Jul →
anubis11–130.0316%29 May →
inferno3–13-0.0610%29 May →
anubis14–16-0.0112%29 May →
mirage7–13-0.0117%29 May →
ancient4–13-0.059%23 May →
inferno13–80.1014%23 May →
ancient13–80.0728%20 May →
inferno15–150.0215%16 May →
mirage13–90.0420%16 May →
inferno8–13-0.0017%13 May →
anubis13–20.009%13 May →
cache13–40.0614%13 May →
nuke13–110.0419%4 May →
ancient8–13-0.0111%4 May →
dust213–10-0.019%1 May →
cache12–12-0.0114%1 May →
vertigo5–13-0.0423%28 Apr →
inferno12–120.0420%28 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0613%27 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0623%27 Apr →
mirage13–110.0520%27 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0316%26 Apr →
mirage13–20.0215%26 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0318%26 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0614%26 Apr →
ancient13–40.0013%22 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0116%22 Apr →
ancient13–80.0524%22 Apr →
anubis13–50.0612%22 Apr →
inferno3–130.0427%22 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0215%19 Apr →
overpass13–80.0418%15 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0116%12 Apr →
inferno13–160.0519%12 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0116%12 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.089%11 Apr →
mirage13–16-0.039%11 Apr →
anubis16–140.0112%11 Apr →
ancient6–130.0116%11 Apr →
dust216–120.0321%10 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0214%6 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.055%6 Apr →
inferno13–90.0317%6 Apr →
ancient13–30.0414%2 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0216%2 Apr →
nuke13–10.0222%2 Apr →
inferno13–50.018%20 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0110%20 Mar →
ancient15–15-0.0116%20 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0511%14 Mar →
mirage7–130.0119%14 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0018%14 Mar →
dust215–15-0.019%14 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0322%14 Mar →
anubis13–50.0320%1 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0014%1 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.017%25 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0610%25 Feb →
overpass11–130.0015%25 Feb →
ancient13–50.0117%24 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0415%24 Feb →
ancient13–80.1020%24 Feb →
anubis9–130.0214%24 Feb →
mirage13–80.0416%24 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.