Frog

Frog — CS2 Stats

US76561197960438163[U:1:172435]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,636Tracked matches36%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,661Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,819Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44033 of 252335 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,575 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,819 -2,747 29 Apr – 14 Oct · 23 days played
22,49026,146peak 26,14629 Apr14 Oct
26,146Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,575Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-04-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,575
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,327 below peak (26,146)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,181 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches59——
Win rate24%——
K/D0.76——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,153), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.4%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy5.6%12.4%12.7%7.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.031.050.13 short
Match win rate32.8%45.2%45.7%12.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFrogFACEITLevel 6 · 1,575 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,819 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,575csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning47
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateTLTWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility5.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time564ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 12 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 6 May →
414msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 5 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
10–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2613–1350%-0.02
infernoB2513–1252%-0.02
mirageC219–1243%-0.03
anubisC104–640%-0.03
ancientS54–180%-0.03
nuke—41–325%0.01
cache—42–250%-0.02
overpass—20–20%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.06
alpine—11–0100%0.03
office—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

290,931Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
14,007Matches
32.8%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5.6%Shot accuracy
20,256MVPs
4,661Hours (in match)
10,386Bombs planted
2,195Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47130,136
AWP23,951
FAMAS7,329
MP93,490

Lifetime map wins

20,086dust2
16,789inferno
7,598nuke
6,045vertigo
1,030train
527cbble
406office
133italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,359Matches
48%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno28156%1.0214.5
Dust227147%1.0014.3
Mirage26842%0.8613.4
Anubis18443%0.9614.1
Nuke10648%0.9314.1
Ancient10348%0.8913.9
Vertigo9361%0.9914.2
Overpass2454%0.8913.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
570msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
30.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
9.75HE damage / grenade
3.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5503° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1518 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke15–150.0117%14 Oct →
nuke9–130.0210%14 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0312%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.0111%12 Oct →
dust213–70.1220%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0618%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.036%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0110%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0033%10 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.008%10 Oct →
mirage11–130.0122%10 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0220%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.1014%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0619%6 Oct →
inferno13–30.0530%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0112%3 Oct →
dust213–10-0.025%3 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0711%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0323%2 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0417%21 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0616%21 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0719%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0917%17 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0120%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0518%16 Sept →
inferno11–130.0016%15 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0711%13 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0314%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0112%13 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0317%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0119%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0323%12 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.049%11 Sept →
dust213–5-0.045%11 Sept →
inferno16–130.0320%10 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.029%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0223%8 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0223%8 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0716%8 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0613%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0529%7 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0526%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0619%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0814%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0127%4 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0023%4 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0019%31 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0817%31 Jul →
dust24–13-0.059%26 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0716%23 Jul →
ancient13–110.0118%23 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0510%15 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0419%15 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0122%13 Jun →
ancient13–80.0225%13 Jun →
nuke13–30.0428%11 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.026%11 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0322%11 Jun →
dust222–18-0.0317%7 Jun →
inferno16–130.0114%7 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.027%3 Jun →
mirage12–16-0.0428%2 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.089%2 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.126%1 Jun →
inferno16–12-0.0213%31 May →
alpine13–100.0318%31 May →
inferno14–16-0.0812%31 May →
mirage13–16-0.0319%27 May →
dust213–60.0318%25 May →
dust29–13-0.0912%20 May →
dust213–8-0.0311%19 May →
inferno13–40.0118%18 May →
inferno7–9-0.1210%18 May →
dust211–130.0018%17 May →
inferno11–13-0.0419%17 May →
office12–120.0823%17 May →
mirage13–60.0824%16 May →
mirage7–13-0.0413%15 May →
inferno13–11-0.0528%14 May →
mirage13–30.0720%12 May →
dust29–13-0.0412%11 May →
dust213–70.0324%9 May →
nuke4–13-0.0224%9 May →
mirage1–13-0.0711%7 May →
inferno9–13-0.0123%7 May →
dust213–9-0.0315%6 May →
anubis13–4-0.0310%6 May →
dust213–8-0.0122%6 May →
mirage9–13-0.0418%6 May →
inferno13–10.0334%6 May →
dust213–20.0718%5 May →
mirage13–2-0.0311%5 May →
mirage13–00.006%5 May →
inferno13–110.023%5 May →
mirage11–13-0.0434%3 May →
inferno11–13-0.0520%2 May →
dust210–130.0713%2 May →
dust210–13-0.0212%30 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0225%29 Apr →
cache13–9-0.0423%28 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.