cyphr ✌

cyphr ✌ — CS2 Stats

US76561198126435606[U:1:166169878]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,238Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,115Blue band · top ~33.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,284 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−283Premier CS Rating · 14,398 → 14,115

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,115 +155 27 Aug – 16 Oct · 25 days played
12,88614,398peak 14,39827 Aug16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,284 +0 5 Sept – 13 Sept · 2 observations
1,2841,284peak 1,2845 Sept13 Sept
14,474Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,284Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,284
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 283 below peak (14,398)
  • +460 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 885 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcyphr ✌FACEITLevel 5 · 1,284 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,115 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,284csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning60
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLWLWWTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time596ms+61ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 15 Oct →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 15 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 13 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 16dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC259–1636%0.01
rush_001B1910–953%-0.03
anubisA1610–663%-0.00
ancientA116–555%-0.02
mirageC114–736%-0.02
dust2D102–820%0.01
nukeC52–340%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.07
vertigo—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

940Matches
49%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
71.7ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10955%1.0715.3
Anubis9949%1.0114.8
Dust28553%0.9914.7
Mirage6348%0.8813.7
Ancient6050%0.9815.0
Nuke3741%0.8913.8
Vertigo2854%1.0114.0
Overpass850%0.7614.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
572msReaction time
62.5%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
13.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.0723%16 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0413%16 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0329%16 Oct →
inferno13–50.0818%15 Oct →
anubis13–20.1424%15 Oct →
inferno15–150.0212%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.0125%14 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0723%12 Oct →
mirage3–1-0.0117%12 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0216%12 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0621%11 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0410%11 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0013%8 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0220%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0717%8 Oct →
rush_0014–8-0.090%8 Oct →
rush_0018–60.1020%8 Oct →
rush_0018–60.028%8 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0214%6 Oct →
rush_0016–8-0.0850%5 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.3117%5 Oct →
rush_0015–1-0.088%5 Oct →
rush_0015–1-0.090%5 Oct →
rush_0017–80.0520%5 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0121%5 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.1333%5 Oct →
rush_0016–80.0518%5 Oct →
rush_0018–5-0.0018%5 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.1050%5 Oct →
rush_0016–80.0232%5 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0918%5 Oct →
inferno5–130.0314%4 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0228%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0410%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0229%30 Sept →
rush_0014–00.0950%29 Sept →
rush_0018–6-0.0414%29 Sept →
rush_0018–5-0.0113%29 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0613%29 Sept →
rush_0011–5-0.0223%28 Sept →
rush_0015–10.0624%28 Sept →
rush_0018–60.0029%28 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.015%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0110%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0816%21 Sept →
anubis13–30.0011%21 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0210%20 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.027%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0216%18 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0214%17 Sept →
anubis16–120.0116%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0233%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0018%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.027%16 Sept →
dust211–130.0114%16 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0315%16 Sept →
inferno9–130.007%16 Sept →
dust25–130.0123%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.0453%15 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0010%15 Sept →
dust210–130.0512%14 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0619%14 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0522%14 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0825%13 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
dust29–130.039%13 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.019%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0410%13 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0116%13 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0624%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0310%13 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0013%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0513%11 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0128%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0030%11 Sept →
inferno16–130.0112%10 Sept →
inferno13–80.0321%10 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0018%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0418%9 Sept →
mirage14–160.0420%9 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0216%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0427%9 Sept →
ancient8–130.0317%8 Sept →
anubis13–50.0510%8 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0112%8 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0210%8 Sept →
inferno15–150.0020%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0117%31 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0218%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.1210%30 Aug →
inferno13–80.1214%30 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0919%28 Aug →
inferno13–70.0531%28 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0315%28 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0422%28 Aug →
anubis13–80.0216%27 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0422%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0032%27 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.029%27 Aug →
nuke13–90.0319%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.