nismob

nismob — CS2 Stats

FI76561197960336757[U:1:71029]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,089Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,040Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,712Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73617 of 259995 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,868 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,712 -5,218 7 Jun – 3 Nov · 17 days played
17,64326,119peak 26,1197 Jun3 Nov
26,225Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,868Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,868
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 133 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,407 below peak (26,119)
  • +1,530 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,288 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.4%46.8%48.2%1.8% short
Shot accuracy10.5%13.0%13.2%2.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.061.070.04 short
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnismobFACEITLevel 8 · 1,868 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,712 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,868csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning67
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning6.7
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 3 Nov →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–4 · nuke, 30 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 21 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2313–1057%0.02
nukeA1912–763%-0.00
dust2C167–944%-0.01
ancientC146–843%0.01
cacheD123–925%0.01
mirageD91–811%-0.02
anubis—41–325%-0.05
overpass—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,935Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
4,476Matches
45.7%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot %
10.5%Shot accuracy
9,747MVPs
1,876Hours (in match)
5,315Bombs planted
1,082Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,070
AWP7,399
MP92,179
MAC-102,141
FAMAS1,538

Lifetime map wins

8,470inferno
7,884nuke
6,268dust2
1,204train
754cbble
711vertigo
268aztec
258office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

610Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
76.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10650%0.9814.3
Nuke9462%1.1115.1
Inferno8648%1.1015.8
Dust28554%1.0415.0
Mirage6252%1.0115.9
Anubis3336%0.9014.0
Overpass1675%1.0715.4
Cache1145%0.8413.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
565msReaction time
63.0%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.42HE damage / grenade
11.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8634% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0523%3 Nov →
ancient13–90.1217%3 Nov →
inferno8–130.0020%30 Oct →
cache9–130.0424%30 Oct →
dust211–130.0423%30 Oct →
nuke4–4-0.0150%30 Oct →
inferno13–60.0230%25 Oct →
cache13–50.048%25 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0316%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.047%24 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0125%24 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0017%24 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0116%24 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0439%18 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0221%18 Oct →
inferno5–130.0418%17 Oct →
inferno13–40.0824%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0220%17 Oct →
inferno13–20.0326%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0424%17 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0218%17 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0011%17 Oct →
inferno13–100.0330%15 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0316%11 Oct →
cache13–100.0234%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.0131%7 Oct →
inferno6–130.0117%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0630%5 Oct →
mirage6–130.0116%5 Oct →
nuke16–140.0323%30 Sept →
nuke13–80.0724%30 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0017%30 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0618%25 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0728%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0326%25 Sept →
inferno13–50.1227%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.054%23 Sept →
inferno22–200.0428%20 Sept →
dust213–60.0450%20 Sept →
ancient16–130.0217%10 Sept →
inferno16–120.0624%9 Sept →
nuke13–10.0648%9 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0917%4 Sept →
ancient9–130.0421%4 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0220%3 Sept →
inferno7–130.0126%31 Aug →
cache10–130.0133%31 Aug →
ancient13–40.0615%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0713%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0523%27 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0419%22 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0114%22 Aug →
cache13–100.0224%22 Aug →
mirage10–130.0417%22 Aug →
inferno13–20.0917%22 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0717%22 Aug →
dust213–50.0840%22 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0231%22 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0521%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0716%21 Aug →
nuke13–100.0323%21 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0120%20 Aug →
dust213–70.0614%20 Aug →
cache11–130.0512%19 Aug →
nuke13–20.0616%19 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0515%19 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0013%9 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0024%5 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0218%5 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0311%3 Aug →
ancient10–130.0020%13 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0328%6 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0112%6 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0912%28 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0316%27 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0415%27 Jun →
inferno13–30.0716%27 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.1120%27 Jun →
dust213–80.0023%27 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0313%27 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0226%27 Jun →
anubis2–13-0.1311%26 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0215%26 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0311%26 Jun →
overpass2–13-0.0910%26 Jun →
inferno10–130.0317%26 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0625%26 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0225%26 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0321%26 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0420%13 Jun →
ancient5–130.0012%13 Jun →
ancient9–130.0220%12 Jun →
cache9–130.0415%12 Jun →
nuke13–50.0124%12 Jun →
inferno9–130.0131%11 Jun →
overpass16–130.0420%11 Jun →
dust24–13-0.1111%9 Jun →
nuke13–100.0115%7 Jun →
dust213–100.0020%7 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.0030%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.