Falachs

Falachs — CS2 Stats

76561199798250170[U:1:1837984442]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

885Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,615Hours in CS77Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 +646 7 Aug – 26 Sept · 19 days played
8,49310,759peak 10,7597 Aug26 Sept
10,759Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 760 below peak (10,759)
  • +1,217 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches190——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.23——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,636), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.9%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.021.030.16 short
Match win rate45.7%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFalachsFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning49
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time612ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 5 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · anubis, 20 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2515–1060%-0.01
infernoC239–1439%-0.02
ancientS1612–475%-0.00
nukeB157–847%-0.02
dust2S75–271%0.00
mirageC73–443%-0.04
cacheD62–433%-0.03
debris—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

34,796Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
2,279Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
43.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,821MVPs
838Hours (in match)
2,664Bombs planted
1,030Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,767dust2
3,363inferno
2,212nuke
526train
324vertigo
68office
30italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

635Matches
50%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
71.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis15853%0.9714.7
Ancient13552%0.9013.9
Mirage11045%0.7612.4
Inferno9947%0.9313.8
Nuke6764%0.8914.2
Dust24536%0.8313.6
Cache1729%0.7812.7
Overpass333%0.5911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
66.3%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
10.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9649% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0317%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0312%30 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.0721%27 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0619%27 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.069%26 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0718%26 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0426%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0124%25 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0917%24 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.038%24 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0124%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0120%22 Sept →
ancient13–50.0015%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.2620%22 Sept →
inferno9–30.0213%22 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0022%21 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0243%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0413%20 Sept →
anubis13–160.0220%20 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0419%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0112%20 Sept →
inferno8–130.0613%20 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0021%19 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.049%19 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0319%19 Sept →
anubis13–60.0618%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0716%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.0211%19 Sept →
anubis7–130.0323%19 Sept →
anubis13–90.0311%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0618%14 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.059%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0022%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.0613%14 Sept →
anubis13–30.0239%14 Sept →
anubis8–130.0113%13 Sept →
mirage19–15-0.0315%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0310%12 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0122%12 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0313%11 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0623%11 Sept →
ancient13–20.0118%10 Sept →
anubis10–130.0115%10 Sept →
debris6–9-0.0341%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0421%6 Sept →
dust213–30.0714%6 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.107%5 Sept →
inferno9–10.1824%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.049%2 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0425%2 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0319%1 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0633%30 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0617%28 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0520%26 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0216%26 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0719%23 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.035%21 Aug →
cache9–130.0320%19 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0427%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0911%19 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0220%19 Aug →
inferno15–150.0722%18 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0216%18 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0120%17 Aug →
nuke13–90.0313%17 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0312%17 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0317%16 Aug →
anubis13–50.059%16 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0221%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.0022%16 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0111%14 Aug →
anubis13–10.0424%14 Aug →
inferno13–50.0314%14 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0221%14 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0215%13 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.038%13 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0118%13 Aug →
ancient13–90.0212%13 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0511%10 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0317%10 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.068%9 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0023%9 Aug →
nuke9–130.037%9 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0821%9 Aug →
ancient11–130.0116%8 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0116%8 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0219%8 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0214%8 Aug →
ancient13–70.0114%8 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0311%8 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0111%7 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0113%7 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0717%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0613%7 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0612%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0120%7 Aug →
anubis13–20.0110%7 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0524%7 Aug →
dust213–30.0431%7 Aug →
dust213–90.0224%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.