☛Am3n ☚

☛Am3n ☚ — CS2 Stats

BW76561199685427233[U:1:1725161505]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

961Tracked matches59%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,890Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,188Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27385 of 225460 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 961 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 25 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,188 -1,902 25 Jul14 Sept · 26 days played
20,78026,090peak 26,09025 Jul14 Sept
26,090Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-07-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,902 below peak (26,090)
  • +428 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 812 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1116−5
Win rate55%63%−8pp
K/D1.340.84+0.50
Headshot %42%44%−3pp

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,054), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate41.8%47.0%49.2%7.4% short
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.3%13.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.701.081.13above
Match win rate63.2%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☛Am3n ☚PREMIER24,188 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 408ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 447ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.5
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility3.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time466ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 466ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 4–5 · ancient, 15 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · anubis, 9 Aug
297msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 17 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 22nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%-0.00
mirageA2213959%0.03
infernoC135838%-0.00
nukeD124833%0.02
ancientC104640%0.02
anubisB63350%0.00
cache43175%0.01
office42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,572Lifetime kills
1.70K/D · Top 5% of Pink band
2,076Matches
63.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band
41.8%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
8,084MVPs
716Hours (in match)
3,283Bombs planted
543Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,747
AWP6,096
MP91,837
MAC-101,746
FAMAS1,593

Lifetime map wins

3,677inferno
3,654dust2
1,740nuke
1,265office
696vertigo
324italy
181train
3safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

131Matches
56%Win rate
1.67Avg K/D
107.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3949%1.6221.2
Inferno2962%1.8323.1
Dust22250%2.0818.6
Mirage1856%1.5220.3
Nuke1250%1.3018.4
Ancient875%1.2018.3
Vertigo3100%1.3323.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
5.6°Preaim
457msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
12.49HE damage / grenade
2.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4319 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.1122%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0410%13 Sept
dust26–130.0617%13 Sept
dust23–13-0.0720%13 Sept
nuke10–130.1218%13 Sept
mirage13–60.062%13 Sept
cache9–2-0.080%13 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0229%13 Sept
office13–90.0332%12 Sept
inferno13–40.0012%12 Sept
inferno5–130.0215%12 Sept
office13–80.0020%10 Sept
dust213–30.0927%6 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0012%6 Sept
dust28–130.0018%6 Sept
cache13–10.0512%6 Sept
dust213–10-0.0418%6 Sept
dust213–3-0.0010%6 Sept
inferno13–30.0738%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0118%5 Sept
inferno13–110.0217%5 Sept
nuke2–13-0.039%5 Sept
dust213–100.0020%5 Sept
mirage13–110.078%2 Sept
office10–130.0415%2 Sept
mirage13–50.0320%30 Aug
mirage15–150.0815%30 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0212%30 Aug
dust213–80.0116%30 Aug
nuke5–130.047%30 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0346%30 Aug
ancient13–80.0022%29 Aug
anubis13–90.0717%29 Aug
nuke11–130.0517%29 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0715%29 Aug
ancient0–3-0.030%29 Aug
inferno5–13-0.073%29 Aug
office10–13-0.0218%23 Aug
mirage13–60.1019%23 Aug
dust213–70.0023%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0230%23 Aug
dust210–130.0118%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0313%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0122%22 Aug
dust213–50.1014%22 Aug
mirage13–110.1012%18 Aug
dust22–13-0.0615%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.049%17 Aug
ancient13–20.0211%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0020%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0612%16 Aug
cache13–16-0.0520%16 Aug
ancient4–130.0221%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0522%16 Aug
dust20–20.000%16 Aug
dust216–14-0.0411%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0519%15 Aug
inferno5–130.038%15 Aug
mirage13–40.0519%15 Aug
dust28–130.097%15 Aug
ancient4–50.1715%15 Aug
anubis4–50.0816%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0517%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0315%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0713%9 Aug
mirage16–120.0615%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0117%9 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0117%9 Aug
dust28–2-0.0733%9 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1260%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.097%9 Aug
dust213–100.0027%6 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0914%6 Aug
dust23–130.0419%6 Aug
ancient13–90.1013%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0122%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.037%5 Aug
mirage13–30.1223%5 Aug
nuke13–60.0228%3 Aug
nuke13–30.0136%2 Aug
mirage13–90.1014%1 Aug
mirage13–16-0.036%1 Aug
inferno1–13-0.046%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0314%1 Aug
nuke3–3-0.030%1 Aug
cache13–70.1213%1 Aug
anubis13–110.0012%1 Aug
dust24–130.0226%1 Aug
anubis7–130.069%31 Jul
nuke11–130.0216%31 Jul
inferno16–120.0729%29 Jul
dust211–130.0113%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0214%26 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0211%26 Jul
dust213–11-0.097%26 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0422%26 Jul
anubis3–6-0.0716%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.069%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0313%26 Jul
mirage6–40.1227%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →