𝔩𝔞𝔶𝔫𝔢 ✠ — CS2 Stats

76561199628127468[U:1:1667861740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,437Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since

5,781Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating18,549Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#101319 of 251158 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,549 -1,451 28 Aug – 9 Oct · 16 days played

21,664Peak Premier in tracked matches

27Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

2,372 below peak (20,921)
-2,003 over 30 days · declining
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,451 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	114	—	—
Win rate	35%	—	—
K/D	0.68	—	—
Headshot %	70%	—	—

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	56.8%	45.7%	46.8%	above
Shot accuracy	0.0%	12.7%	13.0%	13.0% short
Kill/death ratio	0.74	1.05	1.06	0.32 short
Match win rate	47.2%	45.7%	46.3%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning71

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateLWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 666ms

Last 20

11–9 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3

Utility6.1

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels6.3

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning7.1

Utility6.1

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels8.7

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time647ms+1ms

first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms

Headshot accuracy21.5%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 8 Sept →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 7 Oct →

438msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · nuke, 20 Sept →

13–2Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 21anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	24	11–13	46%	0.01
mirage	B	21	11–10	52%	0.01
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
anubis	D	13	3–10	23%	0.00
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	0.03
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,363Lifetime kills

0.74K/D

1,885Matches

47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players

56.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

0.0%Shot accuracy

4,120MVPs

5,781Hours (in match)

2,567Bombs planted

333Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,116

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,341

P2000 / USP-S2,924

Desert Eagle2,901

AWP2,619

Glock-181,335

MAC-10722

Galil AR672

MP9642

FAMAS485

Lifetime map wins

4,598dust2

2,619nuke

2,093inferno

320train

220vertigo

11italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

561Matches

50%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

79.8ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	127	50%	1.04	16.8
Mirage	120	51%	0.98	15.8
Ancient	74	51%	1.06	16.7
Inferno	60	38%	0.97	15.7
Nuke	58	57%	1.16	17.1
Anubis	55	49%	1.03	15.8
Cache	39	46%	1.11	15.3
Vertigo	14	57%	1.04	15.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

647msReaction time

67.3%T opening success

62.1%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

9.48HE damage / grenade

16.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	-0.04	14%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	42%	7 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	17%	7 Oct →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	22%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.01	19%	7 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.08	28%	7 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	23%	6 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.08	24%	6 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	21%	6 Oct →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	16%	6 Oct →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	12%	6 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.05	19%	6 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.06	29%	6 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.06	22%	6 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	17%	5 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.00	20%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	3 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	20%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.00	16%	3 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.01	28%	3 Oct →
anubis	6–13	0.02	11%	3 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.03	25%	3 Oct →
nuke	14–16	0.01	14%	1 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.04	24%	1 Oct →
cache	6–13	0.03	25%	1 Oct →
mirage	13–16	0.08	19%	30 Sept →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	16%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	33%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.04	20%	30 Sept →
anubis	7–13	0.08	22%	30 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.07	25%	30 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.01	29%	30 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	16%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.03	29%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–3	-0.06	17%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.03	22%	26 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	18%	26 Sept →
nuke	15–15	0.01	19%	26 Sept →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	17%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.10	28%	26 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	10%	25 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.02	18%	25 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	22%	25 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	30%	24 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.03	26%	24 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	19%	24 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	11%	23 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.02	31%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	15%	23 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	12%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	21%	23 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.01	21%	23 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.05	24%	22 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.10	27%	22 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	14%	22 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.01	26%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–16	0.08	16%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.10	30%	21 Sept →
mirage	0–2	-0.01	0%	21 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.09	29%	21 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.08	35%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.05	14%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.07	24%	20 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.01	24%	20 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.06	25%	20 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	18%	20 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	15%	19 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	21%	18 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	28%	18 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.02	21%	18 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	15%	17 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	29%	16 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.10	15%	16 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	20%	16 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.03	31%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	9%	14 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	14%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	18%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.02	23%	11 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	13%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.05	22%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.04	26%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.05	25%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	20%	9 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.04	15%	9 Sept →
cache	14–16	-0.01	18%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	18%	9 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	29%	9 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.03	26%	9 Sept →
inferno	12–16	0.00	17%	9 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.02	30%	8 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.05	25%	8 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	39%	8 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.07	28%	8 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.06	19%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.11	35%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	26%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.04	23%	6 Sept →