naur1g_wallhacks

naur1g_wallhacks — CS2 Stats

LT76561199533042347[U:1:1572776619]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,158Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,706Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,650Top 50% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98662 of 247963 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 920 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,650 -1,349 16 Jul – 5 Sept · 9 days played
18,55320,445peak 20,44516 Jul5 Sept
20,445Peak Premier in tracked matches
920Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 920
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,795 below peak (20,445)
  • -1,248 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,350 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy1.6%12.7%13.0%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.051.060.14 short
Match win rate44.3%45.7%46.3%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnaur1g_wallhacksFACEITLevel 7 · 920 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,650 · Purple bandPEAK ELO920csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning73
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.8
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning7.3
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time567ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 11 Aug →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 3–5 · vertigo, 24 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2410–1442%-0.00
ancientA2011–955%0.01
cacheB189–950%0.01
vertigoB168–850%0.01
nukeD70–70%-0.05
infernoB63–350%0.02
dust2A53–260%0.01
mirage—42–250%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,057Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,053Matches
44.3%Match win rate
52.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
1.6%Shot accuracy
4,415MVPs
815Hours (in match)
2,786Bombs planted
561Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,162dust2
2,012nuke
1,532inferno
1,429vertigo
435train
260office
25italy
6assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

142Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2945%1.0915.1
Anubis2864%1.3617.0
Mirage2654%0.9512.8
Cache1753%1.2315.3
Dust21450%1.1515.2
Nuke1450%1.1815.4
Inferno540%0.7613.2
Vertigo540%0.9514.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
565msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
10.89HE damage / grenade
6.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.0713%30 Sept →
cache7–120.0322%30 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0634%29 Sept →
cache8–130.0127%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0021%26 Sept →
cache13–160.0632%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0323%25 Sept →
ancient13–90.0013%25 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0720%16 Sept →
anubis10–130.0127%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0717%15 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0216%13 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0312%13 Sept →
anubis11–130.0326%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0725%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.0220%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0015%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0328%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0127%10 Sept →
ancient11–130.0122%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0324%9 Sept →
anubis13–100.0625%9 Sept →
vertigo9–6-0.0239%9 Sept →
vertigo9–60.0517%9 Sept →
cache3–130.0332%7 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0327%7 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.1025%7 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.1229%5 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0232%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0321%5 Sept →
anubis13–100.0331%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0442%5 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0419%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0649%1 Sept →
vertigo9–40.119%28 Aug →
vertigo6–9-0.1318%28 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0026%28 Aug →
anubis10–130.0219%28 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0813%27 Aug →
cache6–13-0.097%26 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0121%26 Aug →
ancient13–90.0417%26 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0925%25 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0229%25 Aug →
cache13–00.0419%25 Aug →
cache13–80.0521%24 Aug →
ancient10–130.0111%22 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.078%22 Aug →
vertigo9–7-0.0139%22 Aug →
inferno9–20.1047%22 Aug →
ancient13–30.0321%21 Aug →
ancient16–140.0118%17 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.047%17 Aug →
cache6–130.0218%17 Aug →
inferno4–90.0636%17 Aug →
vertigo9–40.0215%16 Aug →
vertigo9–60.0127%16 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0519%16 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0216%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.0726%16 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0125%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.0015%14 Aug →
ancient13–80.0516%14 Aug →
anubis9–130.0215%12 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0220%12 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0238%11 Aug →
vertigo13–7-0.0231%11 Aug →
inferno9–20.1322%11 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0830%10 Aug →
cache13–50.0018%8 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0115%7 Aug →
nuke14–160.0119%6 Aug →
anubis13–60.0213%6 Aug →
mirage5–130.0433%6 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0816%5 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0614%5 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0833%4 Aug →
vertigo10–13-0.018%4 Aug →
ancient8–130.0219%4 Aug →
cache13–60.0432%4 Aug →
vertigo9–130.0227%3 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0126%3 Aug →
vertigo10–13-0.0123%29 Jul →
inferno1–9-0.180%28 Jul →
nuke5–9-0.1224%24 Jul →
anubis16–140.0221%24 Jul →
ancient13–70.1029%24 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0226%24 Jul →
vertigo3–50.1158%24 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.1122%24 Jul →
anubis7–10.0732%24 Jul →
anubis10–130.0822%24 Jul →
anubis7–130.0639%24 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0119%18 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0425%18 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0419%18 Jul →
cache13–60.029%17 Jul →
nuke7–130.0026%17 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0215%16 Jul →
cache13–110.0230%16 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.