ฤ๐™„๐™• ๐˜ฝ๐˜ผLZ

ฤ๐™„๐™• ๐˜ฝ๐˜ผLZ โ€” CS2 Stats

GS76561199178323440[U:1:1218057712]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,810Tracked matches24%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,948Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band ยท top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 -5,112 6 Aug โ€“ 2 Oct ยท 17 days played
15,00020,112peak 20,1126 Aug2 Oct
20,113Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-08-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,112 below peak (20,112)
  • -3,122 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 โ€” 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches43โ€”โ€”
Win rate28%โ€”โ€”
K/D1.03โ€”โ€”
Headshot %54%โ€”โ€”

Measured 3 Sep 2026 โ†’ 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile โ€” every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate39.9%44.3%46.9%7.0% short
Shot accuracy8.4%11.9%13.0%4.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.031.080.21 short
Match win rate41.4%45.2%46.7%5.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGฤ๐™„๐™• ๐˜ฝ๐˜ผLZPREMIER15,000 ยท Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning63
Utility37

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38โ€“58โ€“4Last 10038%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท +1.4pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0โ€“5 ยท 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 1โ€“9 ยท 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 2โ€“16โ€“2 ยท 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success โ€” entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 44% on CT โ€” first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.3
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first โ…“ avg 0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.02
Reaction time519msโˆ’43ms
first โ…“ avg 562ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+2.4%
first โ…“ avg 19.7% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating ยท 9โ€“0 ยท inferno, 26 Aug โ†’
40%Best headshot accuracy ยท 9โ€“5 ยท vertigo, 18 Sept โ†’
344msFastest reaction time ยท 5โ€“13 ยท inferno, 13 Aug โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท mirage, 24 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L6Current streak
5โ€“4In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 50% over 12dust2Weakest map ยท 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD227โ€“1532%0.01
nukeC135โ€“838%0.00
ancientB126โ€“650%0.02
officeC125โ€“742%0.03
anubisD113โ€“827%-0.00
mirageB115โ€“645%-0.00
dust2D92โ€“722%0.00
vertigoC52โ€“340%0.02
trainโ€”32โ€“167%0.03
cacheโ€”21โ€“150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,252Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
6,555Matches
41.4%Match win rate
39.9%Headshot %
8.4%Shot accuracy
17,347MVPs
1,948Hours (in match)
4,190Bombs planted
1,166Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,423
AWP7,357
MP92,635
MAC-102,022
FAMAS1,854

Lifetime map wins

9,134office
8,868vertigo
5,574nuke
4,938inferno
4,600dust2
932train
115italy
12cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
88.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.1816.6
Dust2617%0.8917.7
Ancient540%1.0918.6
Nuke475%1.5420.8
Cache450%1.2816.5
Anubis367%0.9215.0
Inferno2100%1.8821.5
Vertigo1100%1.1011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.2ยฐPreaim
521msReaction time
60.4%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
3.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4888 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy โ†’Dust 2 grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9โ€“130.0126%2 Oct โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.0321%2 Oct โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.0137%2 Oct โ†’
office7โ€“12-0.0415%2 Oct โ†’
office8โ€“130.0328%2 Oct โ†’
vertigo3โ€“9-0.0619%2 Oct โ†’
office13โ€“70.1438%2 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“160.0217%27 Sept โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.0214%27 Sept โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0714%27 Sept โ†’
vertigo8โ€“80.0615%27 Sept โ†’
vertigo1โ€“9-0.1513%27 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.0818%27 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“90.0620%27 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.0023%27 Sept โ†’
office13โ€“6-0.0038%26 Sept โ†’
office6โ€“130.0329%26 Sept โ†’
office6โ€“13-0.0130%26 Sept โ†’
office8โ€“120.0420%26 Sept โ†’
office7โ€“13-0.0210%26 Sept โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0718%21 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0221%21 Sept โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0423%21 Sept โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0321%21 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0213%20 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0826%18 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.1019%18 Sept โ†’
vertigo9โ€“50.2240%18 Sept โ†’
anubis4โ€“130.0213%18 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0626%18 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0214%18 Sept โ†’
office12โ€“120.0838%16 Sept โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0216%16 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0312%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.1014%14 Sept โ†’
nuke16โ€“14-0.0623%14 Sept โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.048%13 Sept โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0131%11 Sept โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0223%11 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“50.1818%11 Sept โ†’
office13โ€“70.0720%3 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0118%31 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0135%31 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“130.0618%31 Aug โ†’
inferno5โ€“90.0319%31 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“160.006%26 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.1618%26 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“00.3025%26 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.0224%26 Aug โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0832%24 Aug โ†’
inferno1โ€“13-0.150%24 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.029%24 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“0-0.0112%24 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0716%24 Aug โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0212%18 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0217%18 Aug โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0513%18 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0215%18 Aug โ†’
dust21โ€“13-0.0419%18 Aug โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0314%18 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“2-0.0117%18 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0111%16 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0312%16 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0318%16 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0325%16 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0020%16 Aug โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0924%16 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“9-0.0524%14 Aug โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.0517%14 Aug โ†’
inferno5โ€“130.0729%13 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“20.1339%13 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0620%13 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0116%13 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0418%13 Aug โ†’
office13โ€“70.0620%13 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“00.0129%12 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“3-0.0221%12 Aug โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.056%12 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0119%12 Aug โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0422%12 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“130.049%12 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0216%12 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“140.0120%12 Aug โ†’
vertigo13โ€“40.0715%12 Aug โ†’
train13โ€“70.1224%12 Aug โ†’
train7โ€“13-0.0634%12 Aug โ†’
train13โ€“30.0419%12 Aug โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.027%11 Aug โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0618%11 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0311%11 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0215%11 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0722%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.1121%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0516%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.0323%6 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“6-0.0216%6 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0313%6 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0415%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“4-0.0322%6 Aug โ†’
office13โ€“40.0233%6 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.