FuZe_Lucky

FuZe_Lucky — CS2 Stats

CZ76561199158242746[U:1:1197977018]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,945Tracked matches34%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,793Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,619 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy4.2%12.7%13.0%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.051.060.11 short
Match win rate43.0%45.7%46.3%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFuZe_LuckyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,619 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning47
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–58–4Last 10038%Win rateTWWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility3.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.7
Utility3.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time506ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 20 Jul →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · train, 20 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 30 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 8 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 44% over 18anubisWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC188–1044%-0.00
anubisD165–1131%-0.01
infernoC146–843%-0.00
ancientD134–931%-0.01
cacheD93–633%-0.03
dust2C94–544%0.01
nukeC52–340%0.02
vertigoC52–340%-0.04
overpass—31–233%0.03
train—30–30%0.02
office—22–0100%-0.02
italy—11–0100%0.03
stronghold—10–10%0.09
warden—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,689Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
4,478Matches
43.0%Match win rate
48.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4.2%Shot accuracy
9,954MVPs
1,547Hours (in match)
2,192Bombs planted
922Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,267
AWP10,766
FAMAS2,290
MP92,139
MAC-101,814

Lifetime map wins

5,820inferno
5,727nuke
5,252dust2
2,256vertigo
1,066train
198office
143cbble
111lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,454Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
80.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage33247%0.9314.4
Dust222652%0.9115.3
Ancient20955%1.1217.0
Inferno20151%0.9816.0
Nuke17753%1.0716.8
Anubis15446%0.9515.6
Overpass6351%1.0917.7
Cache4652%0.9515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
505msReaction time
48.4%T opening success
32.0%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
3.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4432 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.9863% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–15-0.0116%13 Nov →
inferno13–70.0524%8 Nov →
nuke13–60.1719%7 Nov →
mirage13–60.0814%7 Nov →
mirage13–70.0034%4 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0217%30 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0613%30 Oct →
anubis13–90.0214%30 Oct →
overpass7–13-0.0429%25 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0524%22 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0413%16 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.079%16 Oct →
cache5–130.0412%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0119%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0127%13 Oct →
dust213–40.037%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0120%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0116%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0614%2 Oct →
cache22–18-0.0420%29 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0418%25 Sept →
anubis10–130.0019%2 Sept →
anubis11–130.0231%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0615%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0323%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0526%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0524%30 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0216%29 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.068%26 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0511%25 Aug →
train4–130.0637%20 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0810%19 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0333%18 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0523%18 Aug →
vertigo13–16-0.0214%17 Aug →
inferno8–130.0321%17 Aug →
ancient19–170.0520%16 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0212%15 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0217%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0532%14 Aug →
mirage13–60.0325%12 Aug →
cache13–110.0116%12 Aug →
mirage9–130.0329%12 Aug →
ancient13–70.0114%12 Aug →
dust213–30.1116%10 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0126%8 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0530%8 Aug →
train2–13-0.0437%8 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0418%6 Aug →
anubis8–130.0021%6 Aug →
ancient10–130.0621%6 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0210%5 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0124%5 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0113%5 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0315%4 Aug →
ancient25–28-0.067%3 Aug →
anubis10–130.0218%3 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0237%2 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0119%21 Jul →
mirage13–100.0324%20 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0218%20 Jul →
anubis13–110.1920%20 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0410%19 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0910%19 Jul →
dust29–130.0218%16 Jul →
dust28–130.0717%16 Jul →
anubis9–130.0327%15 Jul →
nuke13–70.0520%15 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.046%14 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0513%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0319%13 Jul →
inferno13–70.0221%12 Jul →
office13–10-0.0618%11 Jul →
overpass8–80.0010%11 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0720%10 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0036%21 Jun →
ancient13–50.0223%18 Jun →
inferno5–130.0019%18 Jun →
italy13–70.0316%18 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0719%17 Jun →
stronghold12–120.0926%17 Jun →
nuke6–9-0.089%17 Jun →
warden12–12-0.0120%15 Jun →
mirage11–130.0424%12 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0112%12 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0135%12 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0029%10 Jun →
cache2–13-0.1320%9 Jun →
inferno10–130.0315%8 Jun →
vertigo7–13-0.0519%8 Jun →
overpass13–20.1322%8 Jun →
office13–60.0236%3 Jun →
inferno13–60.0417%1 Jun →
train11–130.0425%1 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0317%30 May →
inferno9–13-0.0824%29 May →
inferno5–130.0227%28 May →
anubis9–130.0319%28 May →
cache5–130.0119%27 May →
vertigo13–8-0.0531%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.