Jakub Zapletal

Jakub Zapletal — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198843163548[U:1:882897820]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,448Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,214Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#16709 of 261680 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,629 -112 16 Jun – 17 Jun · 2 days played
25,62925,741peak 25,74116 Jun17 Jun
25,741Peak Premier in tracked matches
62Days played since 2026-05-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy10.8%13.0%13.2%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.061.07above
Match win rate47.3%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJakub ZapletalFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning63
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateTLWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time527ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 12 Jun →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 28 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–4 · cache, 15 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 8 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 50% over 6dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC177–1041%0.02
mirageB157–847%0.02
anubisC135–838%-0.01
ancientC114–736%0.01
cacheC104–640%0.02
dust2D103–730%0.01
overpassB63–350%0.03
vertigoC52–340%-0.01
nukeC52–340%0.01
train—31–233%-0.02
office—22–0100%0.05
italy—11–0100%0.08
stronghold—10–10%0.03
warden—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,634Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,051Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
50.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10.8%Shot accuracy
10,838MVPs
1,316Hours (in match)
4,407Bombs planted
1,901Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,106
AWP6,919
MP91,730
FAMAS1,650
MAC-101,610

Lifetime map wins

6,021inferno
3,671dust2
2,688nuke
1,448vertigo
1,229train
859office
387cbble
48italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,141Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
83.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21644%1.1016.4
Inferno13747%1.1216.8
Ancient13355%1.1917.3
Nuke11250%1.1316.5
Dust210749%1.0716.8
Anubis8651%1.0516.5
Cache5655%1.0615.8
Overpass5659%1.2417.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
530msReaction time
43.5%T opening success
66.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
10.61HE damage / grenade
7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.1022%13 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0121%9 Nov →
ancient13–100.0214%9 Nov →
inferno13–70.0630%8 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0319%4 Nov →
ancient13–70.0321%30 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0523%30 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0513%30 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0020%29 Oct →
overpass7–130.1216%25 Oct →
vertigo11–130.0119%22 Oct →
ancient6–130.0112%16 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0510%16 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0113%16 Oct →
cache8–40.066%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0625%15 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0521%15 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0321%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.1316%13 Oct →
nuke5–130.0216%13 Oct →
dust213–40.0832%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0814%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0311%6 Oct →
ancient9–130.0525%2 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0110%2 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0227%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0419%23 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0118%14 Sept →
mirage13–40.0112%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0312%2 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.026%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0313%30 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0510%29 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.057%26 Aug →
ancient9–130.0119%25 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0323%19 Aug →
mirage12–120.0729%19 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0214%18 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0222%18 Aug →
vertigo13–16-0.1015%17 Aug →
inferno8–130.0314%17 Aug →
ancient19–17-0.0323%16 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0414%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0514%14 Aug →
mirage13–60.0316%12 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0026%10 Aug →
ancient5–130.019%8 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0313%8 Aug →
train2–13-0.0519%8 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0213%5 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0012%4 Aug →
ancient25–28-0.0017%3 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0713%3 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0510%2 Aug →
cache13–70.0717%21 Jul →
dust28–130.0816%19 Jul →
dust29–130.0517%16 Jul →
dust28–13-0.017%16 Jul →
anubis9–130.0326%15 Jul →
nuke13–70.109%15 Jul →
anubis13–110.0322%14 Jul →
anubis13–90.0130%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0124%13 Jul →
inferno5–130.0014%13 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.016%12 Jul →
office13–100.1227%11 Jul →
overpass8–8-0.0110%11 Jul →
cache9–130.0618%10 Jul →
overpass13–100.0414%1 Jul →
overpass13–8-0.0019%1 Jul →
train13–70.0212%30 Jun →
anubis13–110.0912%22 Jun →
mirage13–80.1312%21 Jun →
ancient13–50.0118%18 Jun →
inferno5–130.1516%18 Jun →
italy13–70.0814%18 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0119%17 Jun →
stronghold12–120.0319%17 Jun →
nuke6–9-0.0126%17 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.0427%16 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0014%16 Jun →
mirage13–80.0631%16 Jun →
warden12–120.0814%15 Jun →
mirage11–130.1621%12 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0220%12 Jun →
inferno13–40.1418%12 Jun →
dust26–130.0327%10 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0713%9 Jun →
inferno10–130.0126%8 Jun →
vertigo7–130.0426%8 Jun →
overpass13–20.0214%8 Jun →
office13–6-0.0212%3 Jun →
inferno13–60.0214%1 Jun →
train11–13-0.0212%1 Jun →
inferno8–130.0418%30 May →
inferno9–13-0.0319%29 May →
inferno5–130.0241%28 May →
anubis9–130.0511%28 May →
cache5–130.0727%27 May →
vertigo13–80.0621%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.