Yonys — CS2 Stats

76561199156045746[U:1:1195780018]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,529Tracked matches86%Win rate2022Tracked since

3,949Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating8.5 ElitePositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#215161 of 261298 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,922 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.4%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	6.3%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.27	1.09
Match win rate	59.1%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim98

Positioning78

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT82–14–4Last 10082%Win rateWWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · +112ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 31%
Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

9–1 · 90% win rate
Avg rating 0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

18–2 · 90% win rate
Avg rating 0.08
Avg headshot accuracy 31%
Avg reaction 466ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.8

Utility5.4

Positioning7.8

Opening Duels7.2

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.8

Positioning7.8

Utility5.4

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels7.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.5/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time504ms−3ms

first ⅓ avg 507ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms

Headshot accuracy29.9%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 29.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 3 Nov →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 16 Oct →

281msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 26 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

18Longest win streak

W5Current streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 78% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	34	28–6	82%	0.04
mirage	S	30	27–3	90%	0.06
ancient	S	12	10–2	83%	0.03
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.08
inferno	S	5	5–0	100%	0.05
office	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (78% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

146,123Lifetime kills

1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

4,245Matches

59.1%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 10 players

53.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

6.3%Shot accuracy

15,701MVPs

4,594Hours (in match)

5,691Bombs planted

1,601Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,549

AWP21,379

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,998

Desert Eagle9,980

P2000 / USP-S8,839

Glock-185,335

Galil AR2,484

MP92,099

Knife1,869

MAC-101,397

Lifetime map wins

7,947dust2

3,929inferno

2,419vertigo

2,017nuke

330train

113cbble

69office

47lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

983Matches

55%Win rate

1.35Avg K/D

85.4ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	377	56%	1.42	19.0
Ancient	157	55%	1.32	17.2
Dust2	155	59%	1.28	16.9
Anubis	133	54%	1.33	18.1
Inferno	59	61%	1.32	17.1
Nuke	51	45%	1.25	17.4
Vertigo	27	48%	1.30	19.2
Overpass	13	77%	1.77	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy

42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.6%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

503msReaction time

55.0%T opening success

68.5%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

14.2%Flash assists

7.70HE damage / grenade

4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4909 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–4	0.08	32%	12 Nov →
dust2	13–6	0.01	33%	11 Nov →
cache	13–7	0.05	24%	11 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.03	25%	11 Nov →
dust2	13–5	0.04	43%	11 Nov →
nuke	8–13	0.08	33%	8 Nov →
dust2	13–4	0.04	12%	7 Nov →
anubis	13–7	0.09	19%	7 Nov →
dust2	13–1	0.16	32%	7 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.04	30%	3 Nov →
ancient	13–2	0.13	37%	3 Nov →
dust2	13–6	0.11	33%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–6	0.17	48%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–3	0.07	38%	2 Nov →
cache	13–3	0.11	22%	1 Nov →
mirage	9–2	0.15	45%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.05	19%	31 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.16	30%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.00	41%	31 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	21%	30 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.11	22%	30 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.02	27%	30 Oct →
mirage	15–15	0.03	34%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.00	50%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.02	38%	29 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.09	24%	29 Oct →
office	12–12	0.03	36%	29 Oct →
office	2–13	-0.09	21%	28 Oct →
office	13–4	0.07	15%	28 Oct →
cache	13–1	0.16	33%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.05	31%	26 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	19%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	21%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.07	45%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.03	26%	26 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.03	18%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.06	31%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.08	24%	25 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	18%	25 Oct →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	29%	25 Oct →
anubis	13–5	-0.03	34%	24 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.03	27%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.05	22%	24 Oct →
dust2	7–13	0.01	33%	24 Oct →
inferno	11–4	0.03	26%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.08	18%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.09	19%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–0	0.14	27%	24 Oct →
ancient	4–13	0.05	16%	23 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.01	17%	22 Oct →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	13%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	23%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.09	30%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	23%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.02	13%	18 Oct →
mirage	6–0	0.04	20%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.07	23%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.02	18%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–3	-0.05	16%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.04	19%	17 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	19%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.14	32%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.14	17%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.12	19%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.08	23%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.13	42%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.02	21%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.07	17%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.12	100%	16 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	10%	14 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	38%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.00	20%	13 Oct →
ancient	2–0	0.09	50%	13 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.12	44%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.01	33%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.03	41%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.07	18%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.10	31%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.05	35%	9 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.02	40%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–2	0.13	22%	8 Oct →
train	12–12	-0.02	25%	8 Oct →
dust2	0–2	-0.03	50%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.08	17%	7 Oct →
anubis	13–2	0.09	26%	27 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	26 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	31%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.13	33%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.03	24%	26 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	16%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.04	38%	21 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.04	32%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.09	25%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.08	24%	20 Sept →
anubis	10–2	0.08	22%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.09	14%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	30%	19 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.04	21%	19 Sept →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	15%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.12	18%	18 Sept →