Y'Q

Y'Q — CS2 Stats

TW76561199157524264[U:1:1197258536]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,506Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,976Top 5% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6007 of 247982 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,229 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,976 +429 18 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 days played
26,54726,976peak 26,97618 Sept25 Sept
26,976Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,229Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,229
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 271 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,976
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,024 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGY'QFACEITLevel 10 · 2,229 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,976 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,229csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning60
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateLTLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time547ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 9 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 20 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · dust2, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 37% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3011–1937%-0.01
mirageA2616–1062%-0.01
ancientS2014–670%0.03
anubisB105–550%0.00
infernoS65–183%0.00
cache—42–250%-0.04
nuke—31–233%-0.02
train—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,016Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44953%1.0515.4
Dust220148%1.0515.8
Ancient18456%1.0615.9
Inferno8051%1.1016.9
Anubis7748%1.1117.1
Nuke1735%0.7713.0
Vertigo475%1.3418.3
Train20%0.8013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
541msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
6.50HE damage / grenade
10.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0327%1 Oct →
ancient12–120.0345%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0422%1 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0620%30 Sept →
dust213–60.0329%30 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0225%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.0111%30 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0335%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0620%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1118%29 Sept →
inferno3–100.0218%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0333%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0025%27 Sept →
anubis13–20.0413%27 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0231%27 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0631%26 Sept →
ancient3–130.0225%26 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0618%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0333%25 Sept →
ancient13–30.0829%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0416%25 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0315%25 Sept →
dust216–140.0223%25 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0029%25 Sept →
ancient13–00.1447%25 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0020%24 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0133%24 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0515%24 Sept →
dust212–120.0411%22 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.0240%22 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0317%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0716%21 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0329%21 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0127%21 Sept →
anubis13–110.0121%21 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0120%21 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0310%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0510%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0511%20 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0132%20 Sept →
anubis5–130.0029%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0024%20 Sept →
mirage7–130.0450%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0028%20 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0513%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0124%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0421%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.0326%19 Sept →
dust20–4-0.060%18 Sept →
anubis13–20.0227%18 Sept →
ancient13–20.0313%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.0135%18 Sept →
inferno13–100.0533%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.0825%18 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0319%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0118%18 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0329%18 Sept →
mirage4–130.0113%18 Sept →
dust210–130.0132%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0440%16 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1119%16 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0711%16 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0616%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0129%16 Sept →
dust210–130.0233%15 Sept →
mirage11–130.0226%15 Sept →
ancient9–130.0541%15 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0538%14 Sept →
ancient13–10.1137%14 Sept →
ancient13–70.0030%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0450%14 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0249%13 Sept →
anubis13–70.0321%12 Sept →
ancient8–130.0230%12 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0334%12 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0236%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.0427%12 Sept →
anubis4–130.0234%12 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0321%11 Sept →
dust213–40.0633%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0016%11 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0623%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0420%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0227%11 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0525%11 Sept →
mirage8–130.0124%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0229%10 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0315%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0133%9 Sept →
dust213–30.1729%9 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.017%9 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0216%9 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0834%8 Sept →
inferno13–20.0421%8 Sept →
ancient16–140.0122%7 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0328%7 Sept →
train13–90.0424%7 Sept →
dust20–40.0443%6 Sept →
ancient13–30.0926%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.