RiseUp™

RiseUp™ — CS2 Stats

DE76561199130736086[U:1:1170470358]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

751Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,842Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,998Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83181 of 251430 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+588Premier CS Rating · 19,410 → 19,998

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,998 +2,967 26 Aug – 13 Oct · 24 days played
16,19719,998peak 19,99826 Aug13 Oct
19,998Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,202Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,998
  • +1,791 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches73——
Win rate56%——
K/D1.03——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.8%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy4.5%12.4%12.7%8.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.201.031.05above
Match win rate48.6%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRiseUp™FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,998 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,202csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateWWLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time529ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 10 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 21 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 10 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2112–957%0.01
mirageA1610–663%-0.01
cacheA159–660%0.03
anubisB157–847%-0.00
infernoB147–750%0.03
ancientS98–189%0.00
nukeA74–357%-0.01
fachwerk—10–10%-0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.10
shelter—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,193Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2,309Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
45.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
4.5%Shot accuracy
5,561MVPs
1,359Hours (in match)
2,154Bombs planted
602Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,285dust2
3,776inferno
1,955vertigo
1,662nuke
263cbble
219train
179office
37lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
56%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
77.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23861%1.0714.4
Mirage3845%1.2413.7
Inferno2365%1.1215.0
Nuke875%1.1115.8
Ancient650%1.0114.5
Anubis333%0.9216.0
Overpass2100%1.8615.5
Cache10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
531msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
2.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4164% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3707 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4873% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.1117%13 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0117%13 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.076%13 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.046%13 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0118%11 Oct →
cache13–70.0317%11 Oct →
anubis13–60.0214%11 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0213%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0418%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.028%10 Oct →
inferno8–80.009%10 Oct →
inferno9–30.2319%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.0119%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.029%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0412%10 Oct →
anubis13–30.0614%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0211%10 Oct →
inferno6–130.0315%9 Oct →
dust213–20.0324%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.017%9 Oct →
ancient13–50.0616%9 Oct →
inferno7–10.020%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0718%9 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0318%9 Oct →
cache11–130.0317%9 Oct →
inferno11–130.118%8 Oct →
anubis9–130.0918%8 Oct →
dust28–130.0413%8 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0413%8 Oct →
dust213–40.0222%4 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0814%3 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0022%3 Oct →
dust213–70.0310%30 Sept →
inferno10–130.0212%30 Sept →
inferno9–130.0119%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0121%30 Sept →
cache13–20.0113%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0915%30 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.1012%30 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0211%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0114%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.024%29 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0413%27 Sept →
mirage13–20.0615%27 Sept →
anubis13–60.0514%27 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.018%27 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0716%27 Sept →
nuke8–130.0217%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0220%25 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0017%25 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0210%25 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0910%25 Sept →
ancient13–80.008%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0022%21 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0312%21 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0129%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0612%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0714%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0013%19 Sept →
fachwerk4–13-0.0515%19 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0020%19 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0412%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0215%17 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0110%16 Sept →
overpass2–13-0.1012%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0122%15 Sept →
dust28–130.0022%13 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0013%13 Sept →
shelter13–70.0120%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0323%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.029%11 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0315%2 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0121%1 Sept →
cache7–130.0818%1 Sept →
dust213–100.1119%1 Sept →
ancient13–110.0323%31 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0118%31 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0116%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0716%31 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0722%31 Aug →
dust213–30.0716%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0121%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0114%29 Aug →
dust213–70.0028%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0416%29 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0410%29 Aug →
inferno13–50.0422%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.0812%28 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0020%28 Aug →
cache6–13-0.027%28 Aug →
cache13–30.0519%28 Aug →
dust213–30.0819%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0413%28 Aug →
cache13–20.0716%28 Aug →
nuke13–90.0013%28 Aug →
ancient13–50.0214%28 Aug →
dust213–110.0512%27 Aug →
nuke9–130.0127%27 Aug →
dust24–130.0816%27 Aug →
nuke13–70.0513%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.