[B4LB] ⚡️Blixten⚡

[B4LB] ⚡️Blixten⚡ — CS2 Stats

SE76561199110109694[U:1:1149843966]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

996Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,231Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,339Purple band · top ~19.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,339 -121 17 Jul – 8 Oct · 22 days played
15,05519,848peak 19,84817 Jul8 Oct
19,962Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,509 below peak (19,848)
  • +892 over 30 days · improving
  • -121 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,661 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy11.5%12.2%11.3%meets
Kill/death ratio1.140.980.99above
Match win rate38.2%43.3%43.9%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[B4LB] ⚡️Blixten⚡FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,339 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning62
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–51–8Last 10041%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.6
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 4 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 4 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 26 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1711–665%0.04
anubisC166–1038%0.00
infernoC156–940%0.02
cacheC145–936%0.01
mirageD133–1023%-0.00
ancientC83–538%0.02
dust2C83–538%0.03
poseidon—41–325%0.01
train—21–150%-0.03
overpass—10–10%0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.15
vertigo—11–0100%0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,526Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
4,462Matches
38.2%Match win rate
47.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
11.5%Shot accuracy
8,870MVPs
1,231Hours (in match)
2,648Bombs planted
913Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,663
AWP9,720
MP72,300
SSG 081,825
P2501,572

Lifetime map wins

5,192inferno
3,974dust2
3,066nuke
1,838vertigo
1,372lake
1,088train
282cbble
254office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
83.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1540%0.9413.3
Inferno933%1.1319.1
Nuke825%1.1416.8
Dust2683%1.4018.5
Ancient367%1.5818.0
Overpass3100%0.9411.7
Train250%2.4323.5
Anubis1100%1.1515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
546msReaction time
47.0%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
7.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3557 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0528%8 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0141%8 Oct →
nuke13–100.0316%1 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0315%1 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0219%1 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.058%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0621%30 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.018%30 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0410%23 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0126%23 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0518%23 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0235%23 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0619%9 Sept →
nuke13–20.1524%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.0619%9 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0424%9 Sept →
mirage11–130.0127%8 Sept →
nuke13–110.0130%8 Sept →
ancient13–20.0620%8 Sept →
overpass10–130.0632%8 Sept →
nuke9–20.0324%8 Sept →
inferno9–30.1530%8 Sept →
dust213–90.0914%5 Sept →
mirage12–120.0222%5 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.1750%4 Sept →
eldorado9–50.1534%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0326%4 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0225%4 Sept →
anubis13–70.0718%4 Sept →
nuke11–130.0234%4 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0127%1 Sept →
inferno13–90.0323%1 Sept →
mirage13–60.0335%1 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0323%26 Aug →
nuke16–130.0319%26 Aug →
ancient13–40.0815%26 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0320%26 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0035%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0220%25 Aug →
ancient14–160.0016%25 Aug →
poseidon5–90.0514%25 Aug →
inferno9–30.1043%25 Aug →
nuke9–40.2240%25 Aug →
nuke13–80.0448%23 Aug →
train13–11-0.0328%23 Aug →
anubis8–130.0427%22 Aug →
inferno13–80.0319%22 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0231%22 Aug →
nuke15–150.0931%22 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0223%22 Aug →
cache12–160.0125%18 Aug →
dust27–130.0528%14 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0724%14 Aug →
nuke6–130.0427%14 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0227%14 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0316%11 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0218%11 Aug →
ancient13–60.0726%11 Aug →
inferno9–130.0220%4 Aug →
poseidon9–5-0.0223%4 Aug →
vertigo9–30.2529%4 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0522%3 Aug →
nuke7–9-0.0528%28 Jul →
train8–13-0.0416%26 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0634%26 Jul →
poseidon7–9-0.0717%26 Jul →
inferno8–80.1122%26 Jul →
mirage5–130.0820%25 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0518%25 Jul →
mirage11–130.0329%25 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.0226%25 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0616%25 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0118%25 Jul →
dust24–130.0321%25 Jul →
inferno13–60.1411%25 Jul →
dust212–120.0131%25 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0133%25 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0731%25 Jul →
inferno9–50.0236%25 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0135%24 Jul →
mirage13–90.0445%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0325%24 Jul →
cache13–80.0736%24 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0130%22 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0113%22 Jul →
anubis13–100.0012%22 Jul →
cache4–130.0344%22 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0632%19 Jul →
cache13–40.1714%19 Jul →
nuke16–130.0423%19 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0023%18 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0612%17 Jul →
nuke13–90.0827%17 Jul →
cache10–130.0029%17 Jul →
anubis13–80.0117%17 Jul →
nuke15–150.0523%17 Jul →
ancient9–130.0926%17 Jul →
dust28–130.0216%17 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0327%16 Jul →
anubis13–20.1417%16 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.