NocnaFuria

NocnaFuria — CS2 Stats

PL76561199106601545[U:1:1146335817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,019Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,717Purple band · top ~21.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,717 +2,737 22 Apr – 14 Oct · 7 days played
13,86316,717peak 16,71722 Apr14 Oct
16,717Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2026-03-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,717
  • +1,608 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,283 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.2%42.7%43.7%2.5% short
Shot accuracy8.9%11.3%12.0%3.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.140.991.02above
Match win rate48.0%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNocnaFuriaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,717 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning57
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateWWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −16.3pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.7
Utility3.1
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time596ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 1–1 · dust2, 31 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–1 · dust2, 31 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · cache, 30 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D144–1029%0.03
nukeB137–654%-0.00
mirageB136–746%0.02
vertigoB137–654%0.01
infernoB115–645%0.02
anubisS96–367%-0.00
cacheA85–363%0.01
poseidonA53–260%0.03
train—32–167%0.03
italy—21–150%0.03
ancient—21–150%0.01
alpine—22–0100%0.03
rush_001—11–0100%0.01
stronghold—11–0100%0.02
warden—10–10%0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.03
office—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,386Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,869Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
41.2%Headshot %
8.9%Shot accuracy
15,921MVPs
974Hours (in match)
4,533Bombs planted
1,321Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,068
AWP5,258
MP93,022
SSG 081,580
MP71,443

Lifetime map wins

4,725nuke
4,183inferno
2,927vertigo
1,411dust2
534train
231office
156cbble
55lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
84.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2544%1.0015.8
Dust21173%0.9514.8
Nuke1040%1.0716.8
Vertigo1060%1.0515.4
Anubis1060%0.9816.2
Inferno743%0.7612.7
Ancient560%1.6417.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
579msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
4.85HE damage / grenade
3.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.373 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0513%14 Oct →
nuke9–40.1020%14 Oct →
inferno7–90.0322%14 Oct →
poseidon7–90.0714%13 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.052%12 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.058%12 Oct →
dust22–8-0.0213%12 Oct →
rush_0018–50.0113%12 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0413%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0329%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0023%9 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0115%1 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0826%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0226%31 Aug →
dust23–130.0538%31 Aug →
dust21–10.25100%31 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0125%30 Aug →
nuke13–80.0024%12 Aug →
inferno13–60.0317%26 Jul →
anubis13–100.0017%25 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0118%3 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0314%2 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.047%2 Jul →
nuke13–20.0912%28 Jun →
train8–13-0.049%23 Jun →
inferno12–120.1823%22 Jun →
train13–30.1030%19 Jun →
italy13–20.0417%19 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.088%18 Jun →
stronghold13–30.0215%18 Jun →
dust213–100.0820%17 Jun →
dust24–130.0225%17 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0030%15 Jun →
dust211–130.0221%14 Jun →
dust27–130.0129%14 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0120%14 Jun →
nuke2–9-0.0719%14 Jun →
warden11–130.0522%14 Jun →
nuke7–130.0513%14 Jun →
overpass13–40.0323%14 Jun →
italy4–130.0225%13 Jun →
cache13–40.0224%13 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0222%10 Jun →
nuke0–4-0.070%8 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0326%8 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0221%7 Jun →
inferno13–90.0819%6 Jun →
mirage13–110.0413%6 Jun →
vertigo13–90.0218%5 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.033%4 Jun →
mirage1–80.0415%4 Jun →
dust213–80.0014%4 Jun →
office12–12-0.1212%2 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0113%1 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0421%1 Jun →
alpine13–30.0514%31 May →
inferno13–2-0.015%30 May →
vertigo13–6-0.0316%30 May →
nuke13–80.0120%29 May →
train13–20.0112%28 May →
vertigo8–130.0215%28 May →
cache10–13-0.0517%27 May →
poseidon9–70.0541%26 May →
cache12–120.0818%26 May →
vertigo13–70.019%16 May →
poseidon7–9-0.1416%14 May →
cache13–100.0729%7 May →
mirage14–160.0117%6 May →
cache13–50.0418%1 May →
cache13–0-0.09100%30 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0013%30 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.039%22 Apr →
nuke13–100.0223%22 Apr →
nuke13–2-0.0217%22 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0112%18 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.053%18 Apr →
anubis7–130.0115%13 Apr →
inferno13–90.0712%12 Apr →
anubis13–110.0210%12 Apr →
anubis13–90.0211%8 Apr →
mirage13–20.1115%7 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0311%6 Apr →
poseidon9–30.1735%6 Apr →
vertigo13–80.0224%6 Apr →
alpine13–30.017%4 Apr →
mirage0–20.000%4 Apr →
vertigo5–13-0.0721%4 Apr →
vertigo9–13-0.0213%3 Apr →
poseidon9–70.0228%3 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0126%3 Apr →
mirage13–110.1330%2 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0317%2 Apr →
anubis13–90.0114%2 Apr →
vertigo3–13-0.0518%2 Apr →
vertigo13–60.0516%31 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.009%30 Mar →
ancient9–130.0618%30 Mar →
vertigo3–130.0223%30 Mar →
vertigo7–130.1214%29 Mar →
mirage12–120.0319%29 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.