Sp0ti

Sp0ti — CS2 Stats

76561199381346129[U:1:1421080401]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,721Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,515Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,620Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88507 of 252703 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,620 -31 11 Aug – 15 Oct · 26 days played
18,34120,742peak 20,74211 Aug15 Oct
20,860Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-08-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,122 below peak (20,742)
  • +946 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 380 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy4.4%13.0%13.2%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.061.07above
Match win rate46.0%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSp0tiFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,620 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–40–3Last 10057%Win rateLWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility2.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time554ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 17 Sept →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · anubis, 27 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 21 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2517–868%0.03
dust2C208–1240%0.03
nukeB179–853%0.00
cacheC94–544%0.01
anubisB84–450%0.01
mirageS75–271%-0.01
vertigoS75–271%0.08
ancient—33–0100%0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.02
debris—21–150%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,752Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4,213Matches
46.0%Match win rate
55.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4.4%Shot accuracy
9,055MVPs
1,515Hours (in match)
3,820Bombs planted
781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,968
AWP7,257
SSG 082,948
MP91,960
MAC-101,539

Lifetime map wins

5,030inferno
4,457nuke
3,979dust2
2,723vertigo
650train
622office
139lake
98italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

489Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10248%0.9414.6
Dust210154%1.0314.8
Anubis9158%1.1515.8
Inferno5951%1.0214.9
Nuke5040%1.0214.6
Ancient4941%1.0216.2
Overpass1573%1.1414.0
Vertigo1080%0.7813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
554msReaction time
55.5%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.34HE damage / grenade
4.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3463 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0413%15 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0022%15 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0320%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0520%15 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0530%14 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0122%14 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0523%13 Oct →
mirage8–130.0123%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0230%12 Oct →
dust22–8-0.048%12 Oct →
inferno13–110.0113%7 Oct →
vertigo13–20.1532%7 Oct →
inferno12–120.0322%7 Oct →
nuke13–70.0116%7 Oct →
vertigo5–130.1023%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.1116%6 Oct →
cache13–90.0921%6 Oct →
inferno13–70.0727%5 Oct →
nuke11–130.0322%4 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0015%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0715%4 Oct →
inferno6–7-0.0715%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0426%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0014%3 Oct →
inferno8–130.1133%2 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0412%1 Oct →
overpass8–13-0.0314%1 Oct →
dust213–50.1220%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0533%30 Sept →
overpass13–3-0.010%29 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0117%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0321%29 Sept →
dust213–110.1421%29 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0116%29 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0916%29 Sept →
cache4–130.0613%29 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0125%29 Sept →
inferno13–50.1313%29 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0133%29 Sept →
cache5–13-0.109%29 Sept →
anubis13–110.0714%28 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0920%28 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0139%28 Sept →
cache13–30.0315%28 Sept →
inferno14–160.0322%27 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0119%26 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0316%26 Sept →
dust213–50.1822%25 Sept →
vertigo13–50.1817%23 Sept →
mirage13–50.0426%23 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0626%22 Sept →
inferno9–1-0.157%21 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0630%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0520%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0337%20 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.0721%17 Sept →
inferno9–20.2239%17 Sept →
inferno9–10.0314%17 Sept →
inferno9–00.2750%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0224%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0227%13 Sept →
dust21–4-0.0131%9 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0413%9 Sept →
dust213–90.0726%9 Sept →
dust213–60.0745%7 Sept →
dust215–150.0116%1 Sept →
inferno7–130.0227%1 Sept →
debris2–9-0.2110%1 Sept →
debris9–60.0433%1 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0224%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0232%31 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0714%31 Aug →
dust21–1-0.030%31 Aug →
dust23–130.1027%31 Aug →
dust212–120.108%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0719%30 Aug →
anubis11–130.0433%30 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0317%29 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0122%29 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0120%27 Aug →
anubis9–1-0.0263%27 Aug →
cache13–160.0118%26 Aug →
inferno13–60.1011%26 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0426%25 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0318%25 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0033%24 Aug →
nuke2–130.0230%24 Aug →
inferno9–60.0932%19 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0120%17 Aug →
ancient13–80.0821%16 Aug →
inferno13–40.0233%14 Aug →
vertigo8–130.0420%14 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0225%14 Aug →
anubis13–80.0923%13 Aug →
nuke5–20.0129%13 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0233%13 Aug →
cache9–130.0326%13 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0329%11 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0221%11 Aug →
nuke13–100.1626%10 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.