cOsteus

cOsteus — CS2 Stats

FI76561199026383769[U:1:1066118041]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,161Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,163Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,700 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,700 → 1,700
+60Tracked matches · now 4,161
+10.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 24 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,571 +1,258 24 Apr14 May · 11 days played
15,09817,769peak 17,76924 Apr14 May
17,769Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,700Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-04-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,700
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches831−23
Win rate63%71%−8pp
K/D1.010.93+0.08
Headshot %27%36%−9pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.4%46.8%48.3%10.9% short
Shot accuracy14.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.061.070.20 short
Match win rate48.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcOsteusFACEITLevel 8 · 1,700 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,700csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning61
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 6–13 · inferno, 28 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 28 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 27 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 8 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB31151648%-0.00
ancientA2012860%0.00
infernoB147750%0.02
cacheA116555%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.04
overpassS75271%0.00
dust2D62433%0.01
anubis32167%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,695Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
5,080Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
37.4%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12,370MVPs
2,479Hours (in match)
5,272Bombs planted
1,233Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,447
AWP5,990
MP94,055
MAC-101,898
SSG 081,673

Lifetime map wins

12,073inferno
10,604nuke
6,333dust2
4,579vertigo
2,057train
32office
17ar_shoots
3cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,016Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
80.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15261%1.1116.5
Nuke13258%1.0615.4
Mirage9652%0.9414.6
Inferno7953%1.0815.9
Cache4955%0.9313.4
Vertigo4344%0.9914.5
Anubis4344%0.9415.4
Dust24038%0.8513.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
550msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
12.1%Flash assists
8.13HE damage / grenade
15.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.144° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.773% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.026%16 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0010%13 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0411%8 Sept
ancient16–120.036%7 Sept
nuke13–60.1116%7 Sept
ancient13–90.0314%5 Sept
cache16–14-0.0512%5 Sept
nuke11–130.015%5 Sept
inferno4–130.0315%4 Sept
ancient13–40.0125%4 Sept
inferno16–130.0110%4 Sept
nuke13–90.0620%3 Sept
ancient22–190.0413%3 Sept
nuke16–130.0215%1 Sept
nuke13–50.099%1 Sept
cache13–90.0211%30 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0711%30 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0017%29 Aug
cache13–7-0.0113%28 Aug
cache1–13-0.1110%27 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0923%27 Aug
inferno5–130.035%22 Aug
nuke8–130.0412%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0521%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.108%20 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0418%16 Aug
cache13–8-0.037%14 Aug
ancient1–13-0.078%12 Aug
ancient8–8-0.0232%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.0310%10 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0541%9 Aug
cache13–80.0137%9 Aug
nuke6–130.0812%7 Aug
dust214–160.0216%3 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0114%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.057%24 Jul
dust27–130.0230%24 Jul
inferno13–80.0424%23 Jul
ancient13–60.0913%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0121%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0223%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0022%22 Jul
anubis13–10.0923%8 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0427%19 Jun
ancient6–13-0.058%19 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0313%16 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0011%12 Jun
overpass13–9-0.017%12 Jun
mirage9–13-0.039%10 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0610%9 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0611%6 Jun
nuke16–120.0115%4 Jun
nuke13–40.0016%3 Jun
cache13–80.0810%28 May
nuke19–22-0.0018%24 May
anubis16–13-0.0217%24 May
nuke13–110.0112%22 May
nuke16–12-0.0613%20 May
cache8–13-0.004%19 May
nuke13–100.0528%17 May
mirage13–60.0423%14 May
nuke13–50.0117%14 May
inferno11–13-0.0420%14 May
nuke13–100.0315%13 May
ancient13–50.0818%12 May
ancient13–60.0411%10 May
cache9–13-0.0716%8 May
nuke4–13-0.0313%8 May
overpass9–13-0.0319%6 May
inferno13–11-0.074%4 May
mirage12–16-0.0717%4 May
mirage13–10-0.0914%3 May
overpass16–120.0113%3 May
inferno13–5-0.009%3 May
ancient13–16-0.0112%2 May
mirage6–13-0.0322%2 May
ancient13–50.0913%2 May
nuke5–130.0016%2 May
ancient13–60.0011%1 May
nuke13–60.0710%1 May
inferno13–60.0411%1 May
ancient5–13-0.047%1 May
nuke3–13-0.0415%1 May
ancient13–50.0120%1 May
mirage13–11-0.0711%30 Apr
inferno8–130.0212%30 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0610%30 Apr
overpass13–50.0612%30 Apr
inferno6–130.28100%28 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0119%28 Apr
nuke5–13-0.097%28 Apr
dust213–60.0018%28 Apr
overpass13–9-0.019%28 Apr
overpass13–110.0013%27 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0413%27 Apr
overpass9–13-0.017%26 Apr
ancient6–13-0.027%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.057%26 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0225%26 Apr
dust213–110.0711%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →