jbr

jbr — CS2 Stats

FI76561198838352458[U:1:878086730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,082Tracked matches40%Win rate2025Tracked since
987Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,357Light Blue band · top ~67.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 506 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+377Premier CS Rating · 6,980 → 7,357
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 6 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,357 -1,771 3 Sept17 Sept · 13 days played
6,58610,114peak 10,1143 Sept17 Sept
10,114Peak Premier in tracked matches
506Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 506
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 245 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,757 below peak (10,114)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,643 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.2%42.7%43.8%6.5% short
Shot accuracy0.3%11.2%12.0%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.991.020.26 short
Match win rate45.3%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjbrFACEITLevel 4 · 506 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,357 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO506csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning64
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4654Last 10046%Win rateWWLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time592ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 23 Jul
38%Best headshot accuracy · 3–6 · dust2, 1 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 0–2 · mirage, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 90% over 10dust2Weakest map · 27% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3392427%0.01
ancientA1811761%-0.01
nukeC114736%-0.04
cacheS109190%0.01
mirageC94544%-0.02
infernoA85363%0.00
anubis41325%-0.04
office31233%-0.00
train32167%-0.03
debris1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,803Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
1,485Matches
45.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
37.2%Headshot %
0.3%Shot accuracy
2,579MVPs
553Hours (in match)
1,450Bombs planted
358Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,408dust2
2,083nuke
1,763inferno
495office
349train
221vertigo
29italy
8ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

280Matches
53%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
61.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6853%0.7211.2
Ancient6769%0.8812.0
Inferno3447%0.7011.6
Cache3155%0.7511.1
Mirage2952%0.7311.1
Dust21932%0.7110.3
Anubis1436%0.7011.0
Overpass1145%0.8311.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
595msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
7.74HE damage / grenade
4.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3483 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0719%17 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0020%16 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0411%15 Sept
nuke5–130.0211%14 Sept
dust28–13-0.0117%14 Sept
inferno13–90.0526%14 Sept
ancient1–13-0.1217%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0115%13 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0322%11 Sept
cache13–20.1020%11 Sept
dust213–80.0610%11 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0014%10 Sept
dust25–130.0215%10 Sept
mirage0–2-0.010%10 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0619%10 Sept
dust23–13-0.1230%10 Sept
dust211–130.0122%10 Sept
dust29–130.0716%9 Sept
ancient13–40.005%9 Sept
inferno13–30.1326%7 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0124%7 Sept
ancient16–12-0.019%7 Sept
nuke13–6-0.068%7 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0917%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.0421%7 Sept
dust213–20.0426%7 Sept
dust22–13-0.0216%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0119%6 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0110%5 Sept
cache16–14-0.0614%5 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0315%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0710%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0416%5 Sept
dust213–30.0314%4 Sept
ancient13–40.0111%4 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0018%4 Sept
cache13–40.0517%4 Sept
dust212–9-0.0115%4 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0118%4 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0516%3 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0211%3 Sept
mirage13–1-0.034%3 Sept
dust29–130.0417%3 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0535%3 Sept
nuke13–30.013%3 Sept
dust212–16-0.0611%3 Sept
dust210–130.0318%3 Sept
office6–13-0.0511%3 Sept
nuke16–13-0.0813%1 Sept
dust213–40.0616%31 Aug
dust213–40.0417%31 Aug
ancient13–80.0914%31 Aug
cache13–10.0515%31 Aug
cache3–13-0.0421%31 Aug
cache13–90.0411%30 Aug
nuke7–13-0.046%30 Aug
cache13–70.0217%28 Aug
cache13–7-0.057%24 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0514%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0515%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0016%21 Aug
cache13–40.0513%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0412%21 Aug
dust29–130.0713%19 Aug
dust211–130.0319%17 Aug
train8–13-0.0416%12 Aug
train13–20.0121%12 Aug
train13–4-0.066%12 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0321%12 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0215%12 Aug
ancient8–8-0.068%11 Aug
dust210–130.0511%10 Aug
nuke7–13-0.063%9 Aug
cache13–8-0.0830%9 Aug
dust214–16-0.0310%3 Aug
dust213–60.0515%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0115%3 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0318%2 Aug
dust29–130.1318%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.0123%1 Aug
dust23–6-0.1038%1 Aug
dust213–1-0.0813%31 Jul
ancient10–13-0.078%28 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0911%28 Jul
debris7–90.0122%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0220%25 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0913%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0320%24 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0210%23 Jul
ancient13–6-0.033%23 Jul
dust213–20.2121%23 Jul
dust25–130.0424%21 Jul
ancient13–40.0511%18 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0111%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0926%15 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0113%15 Jul
office13–40.0218%9 Jul
office9–130.0211%8 Jul
anubis13–10.0418%8 Jul
dust29–13-0.0513%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →