Dek

Dek — CS2 Stats

US76561199014120722[U:1:1053854994]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

814Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
509Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,836Blue band · top ~34.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 13,836 → 13,836
+3Tracked matches · now 814
+6.9ppWin rate · 55.2% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 9 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,836 -2,344 9 Aug19 Sept · 25 days played
13,36617,504peak 17,5049 Aug19 Sept
18,030Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-08-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,668 below peak (17,504)
  • -3,542 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,164 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=20,242), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate41.4%41.9%44.3%2.9% short
Shot accuracy2.0%9.6%11.8%9.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.980.981.030.05 short
Match win rate47.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDekPREMIER13,836 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning64
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42526Last 10042%Win rateWWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −12.7pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time646ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 5–3 · cache, 16 Sept
53%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 12 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 18 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28111739%-0.00
dust2C1761135%0.01
cacheB157847%0.02
infernoC104640%-0.02
ancientA95456%0.01
nukeD82625%0.00
anubisA74357%0.00
office31233%-0.04
vertigo220100%-0.01
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,183Lifetime kills
0.98K/D · Top 50% of Blue band
1,495Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
41.4%Headshot %
2.0%Shot accuracy
2,818MVPs
509Hours (in match)
783Bombs planted
296Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,628dust2
1,684inferno
1,667nuke
917vertigo
164train
54office
14cbble
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
45%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.7911.7
Vertigo250%0.8113.5
Anubis20%1.0215.5
Ancient2100%1.5414.5
Nuke10%0.7414.0
Inferno1100%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
641msReaction time
61.0%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.52HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.463 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–8-0.0414%20 Sept
ancient13–40.0420%20 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0218%19 Sept
ancient5–130.0214%19 Sept
mirage10–130.0418%19 Sept
mirage5–130.0120%18 Sept
anubis13–10-0.039%18 Sept
ancient13–40.0314%18 Sept
inferno13–90.008%18 Sept
nuke5–130.018%18 Sept
cache13–80.0726%18 Sept
anubis13–90.019%18 Sept
cache5–30.1250%16 Sept
ancient13–80.0111%15 Sept
cache9–130.0017%14 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0130%13 Sept
cache13–60.0327%13 Sept
inferno7–9-0.1050%12 Sept
ancient6–130.0116%12 Sept
dust24–130.0532%12 Sept
mirage16–140.0010%12 Sept
dust213–10-0.0519%12 Sept
anubis13–90.0526%12 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0153%12 Sept
inferno15–150.0217%12 Sept
mirage4–130.007%11 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0429%11 Sept
cache13–50.0121%11 Sept
inferno13–110.0022%11 Sept
mirage13–90.0421%9 Sept
mirage13–20.0515%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0519%9 Sept
nuke6–130.0321%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0426%8 Sept
anubis11–13-0.017%8 Sept
cache10–130.0228%8 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0129%7 Sept
dust213–6-0.0018%7 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0012%7 Sept
dust27–130.0418%7 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0611%6 Sept
cache7–13-0.0315%6 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0530%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0311%6 Sept
cache9–13-0.0811%5 Sept
mirage8–130.0017%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0512%4 Sept
mirage4–130.0215%4 Sept
dust213–80.0720%4 Sept
nuke12–120.0613%4 Sept
cache13–90.0628%4 Sept
dust211–130.0827%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0621%4 Sept
cache8–130.0222%4 Sept
mirage9–7-0.0310%3 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0214%3 Sept
office4–13-0.0320%3 Sept
office12–12-0.0811%2 Sept
dust213–50.0422%1 Sept
dust21–13-0.0215%1 Sept
cache7–130.0511%28 Aug
dust211–130.0633%28 Aug
cache13–80.0311%28 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0718%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0426%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0122%28 Aug
vertigo13–90.0232%28 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0821%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0518%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.039%26 Aug
cache7–13-0.0524%26 Aug
train9–130.0121%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0410%26 Aug
mirage8–13-0.038%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0722%25 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0210%25 Aug
ancient11–5-0.0222%24 Aug
cache14–160.0622%24 Aug
dust29–130.0215%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0510%24 Aug
dust213–30.0119%24 Aug
office13–8-0.0116%24 Aug
mirage5–130.0228%21 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0123%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0719%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0622%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0215%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0526%19 Aug
dust213–70.0013%19 Aug
dust212–12-0.0126%18 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0435%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0812%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0216%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0611%12 Aug
cache13–50.0418%12 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0544%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0824%12 Aug
nuke8–130.016%12 Aug
ancient13–70.0416%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.077%9 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →