hannu — CS2 Stats

FI76561199013210640[U:1:1052944912]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,493Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,525Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAll-Rounder

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	50.5%	41.3%	41.8%	above
Shot accuracy	12.6%	12.7%	12.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.94	0.95	0.98	0.04 short
Match win rate	48.6%	42.6%	43.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning68

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–46–12Last 10042%Win rateLWLLWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

7–12–1 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.3

Utility4.9

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels6.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning6.8

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels7.7

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time542ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 6–0 · mirage, 26 Dec →

38%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 11 Dec →

352msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 23 Dec →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 43% over 79nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	79	34–45	43%	0.02
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	0.02
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,549Lifetime kills

0.94K/D

2,557Matches

48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 2 players

50.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players

12.6%Shot accuracy

5,840MVPs

765Hours (in match)

2,295Bombs planted

382Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,640

M4A4 / M4A1-S6,212

P2000 / USP-S2,955

Glock-182,387

Desert Eagle2,370

MP91,988

AWP1,913

MAC-101,114

Galil AR998

FAMAS522

Lifetime map wins

6,299inferno

1,438nuke

320dust2

117train

74vertigo

35lake

29office

21cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches

17%Win rate

0.54Avg K/D

—ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

80.1%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

547msReaction time

62.8%T opening success

58.5%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

9.44HE damage / grenade

6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4139 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.02	21%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–6	0.07	19%	4 Nov →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	13%	4 Nov →
nuke	3–13	0.01	13%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.03	22%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.02	24%	3 Nov →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	18%	2 Nov →
mirage	12–12	0.05	26%	2 Nov →
mirage	13–8	-0.08	10%	28 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.06	18%	26 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.09	12%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.04	15%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.02	25%	22 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	10%	22 Oct →
mirage	0–13	-0.01	21%	22 Oct →
mirage	4–13	0.05	19%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	11%	21 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.05	13%	21 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	17%	21 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	16%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	18%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.06	18%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.09	16%	30 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.04	14%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.01	15%	26 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.02	21%	26 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.05	14%	26 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.02	16%	26 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.06	16%	26 Sept →
nuke	16–12	0.03	17%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.04	27%	26 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.02	26%	23 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.09	13%	23 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	15%	20 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.07	25%	20 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.03	25%	20 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.04	10%	17 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	19%	17 Sept →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	23%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.08	13%	13 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	10%	13 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.05	30%	13 Sept →
inferno	1–11	-0.03	11%	11 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	19%	11 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	20%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.00	23%	10 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	20%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.05	13%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	23%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	22%	10 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.11	21%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.12	19%	10 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	10 Sept →
nuke	15–15	-0.06	13%	7 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	7 Sept →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	16%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	29%	6 Sept →
mirage	12–12	-0.09	19%	7 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.10	25%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.07	14%	20 May →
cache	7–13	0.06	24%	20 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	21%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	30%	27 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.03	17%	7 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.02	16%	31 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.04	10%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.06	20%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.05	10%	30 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	14%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	11%	29 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.16	20%	29 Mar →
mirage	12–12	0.16	15%	29 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	13%	29 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.04	13%	20 Mar →
mirage	3–13	0.00	35%	20 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.03	19%	12 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	20%	12 Mar →
mirage	11–7	-0.00	6%	27 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.04	16%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.02	20%	27 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	13%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–1	0.03	19%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.00	15%	2 Jan →
mirage	15–15	0.04	14%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.05	30%	27 Dec →
mirage	7–13	0.03	30%	27 Dec →
mirage	13–6	0.12	19%	26 Dec →
mirage	6–0	0.19	27%	26 Dec →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	14%	23 Dec →
mirage	8–13	0.01	17%	23 Dec →
mirage	13–2	0.08	30%	21 Dec →
mirage	13–1	0.07	11%	21 Dec →
nuke	10–13	0.01	12%	21 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	16%	21 Dec →
mirage	11–13	0.02	8%	20 Dec →
mirage	13–3	0.08	25%	20 Dec →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	38%	11 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	12%	11 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	8 Dec →