thanos

thanos — CS2 Stats

76561199002074827[U:1:1041809099]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,327Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
10,015Hours in CS217Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,440 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (53 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,440 → 1,440
+119Tracked matches · now 1,327
+10.2ppWin rate · 46.4% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,734 -892 19 Jun – 26 Jun · 6 days played
11,36512,626peak 12,62619 Jun26 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,440 +0 5 Sept – 15 Sept · 3 observations
1,4401,440peak 1,4405 Sept15 Sept
12,626Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,440Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,440
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 91 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.0%46.8%48.2%5.2% short
Shot accuracy1.0%13.0%13.2%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.061.070.17 short
Match win rate44.9%46.3%46.9%2.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGthanosFACEITLevel 8 · 1,440 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,440csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning47
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–40–5Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +82ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility1.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.7
Utility1.7
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time536ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 25 May →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 20 Jun →
367msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 19 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
14–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS1812–667%-0.01
ancientB178–947%-0.03
infernoS1511–473%0.06
anubisC145–936%-0.01
nukeB136–746%0.00
dust2S108–280%0.00
cacheC94–544%-0.00
poseidon—31–233%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,962Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
1,748Matches
44.9%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot %
1.0%Shot accuracy
4,466MVPs
668Hours (in match)
1,593Bombs planted
436Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,025nuke
1,883dust2
1,806inferno
643vertigo
492train
127lake
51cbble
17office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

593Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15453%0.9515.8
Mirage12945%0.9514.7
Anubis12461%1.0716.6
Nuke6456%1.0414.8
Dust24558%0.8813.0
Inferno3845%0.8012.4
Overpass1921%1.0015.8
Cache1323%0.9116.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
541msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
3.66HE damage / grenade
2.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2533 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0063% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0212%6 Nov →
cache7–13-0.0010%5 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0018%3 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.023%2 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.1114%2 Nov →
anubis13–50.0316%29 Oct →
nuke13–100.0524%29 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0423%28 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0025%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0121%28 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0219%28 Oct →
ancient13–50.039%27 Oct →
ancient13–30.0230%27 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0316%26 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0422%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0116%22 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0813%22 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0316%20 Oct →
inferno13–40.0526%19 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0117%18 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0138%18 Oct →
mirage16–130.0020%17 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0511%17 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0516%16 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0510%7 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0428%6 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0720%5 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.067%4 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0423%4 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.019%3 Oct →
cache19–17-0.0013%3 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0517%1 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0130%1 Oct →
cache16–19-0.0322%30 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0411%29 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0410%28 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.005%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0719%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0126%27 Sept →
nuke6–130.0521%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0330%23 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0821%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.0216%14 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0323%13 Sept →
dust213–50.0313%13 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0117%13 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0321%13 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.089%12 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0914%12 Sept →
dust213–110.0323%12 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0317%11 Sept →
nuke11–130.0322%11 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0326%10 Sept →
anubis25–23-0.0323%9 Sept →
anubis5–130.0326%6 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0116%6 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.059%6 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0823%10 Jul →
mirage13–50.1112%8 Jul →
cache11–130.0011%30 Jun →
dust213–110.1015%26 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0520%25 Jun →
dust213–90.0632%24 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0125%24 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0318%21 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0119%21 Jun →
ancient16–12-0.0112%20 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0139%20 Jun →
dust20–13-0.0228%20 Jun →
nuke13–10.0111%19 Jun →
anubis10–130.1025%16 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0230%26 May →
mirage7–13-0.002%26 May →
nuke9–50.1012%26 May →
nuke9–7-0.067%25 May →
inferno9–70.0216%25 May →
inferno9–70.0317%25 May →
inferno9–10.194%25 May →
inferno9–10.3121%25 May →
inferno9–40.066%25 May →
inferno9–40.0824%25 May →
poseidon8–8-0.0725%25 May →
vertigo4–9-0.0420%25 May →
inferno9–60.024%25 May →
poseidon8–80.0725%25 May →
inferno9–40.1419%25 May →
inferno9–10.2419%25 May →
poseidon9–40.0821%25 May →
ancient10–13-0.0316%25 May →
mirage13–11-0.060%21 May →
ancient6–13-0.0621%15 May →
ancient13–70.0616%10 May →
nuke13–6-0.0116%10 May →
nuke7–130.0115%10 May →
ancient13–10-0.0811%9 May →
anubis13–40.0522%4 May →
cache12–120.0414%3 May →
cache13–40.0021%3 May →
anubis13–70.0011%3 May →
cache11–13-0.0220%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.