nacrams — CS2 Stats

76561198410475551[U:1:450209823]✓ No bans

2,549Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,750Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5041 of 18131 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnacramsPREMIER22,750 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning48
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression6.3
Utility2.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.8
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time550ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–6
130Biggest win — train
4Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 22cacheWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24121250%0.02
nukeA2213959%0.01
dust2A2011955%0.01
cacheC125742%0.00
ancientA95456%0.01
infernoC73443%0.01
train31233%0.10
anubis21150%-0.02
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,308Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
85.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21044%0.9916.8
Ancient11252%1.0818.2
Anubis8656%1.0117.0
Nuke7649%1.0416.6
Dust25953%1.0918.9
Inferno4233%0.8815.9
Vertigo4248%0.9916.9
Train1856%1.2017.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
547msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
10.93HE damage / grenade
1.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4824 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7488% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.0314%17 Aug
nuke5–4-0.0621%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0125%17 Aug
cache13–60.0121%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0232%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0314%10 Aug
cache7–13-0.0122%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0725%8 Aug
dust216–120.0624%5 Aug
ancient9–130.0319%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0322%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0120%27 Jul
cache13–60.1415%27 Jul
nuke8–130.0232%27 Jul
ancient13–110.1221%26 Jul
dust24–12-0.0210%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0336%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0620%14 Jul
nuke1–9-0.0214%14 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0015%13 Jul
dust213–100.0316%12 Jul
nuke16–140.0121%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0231%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.068%12 Jul
dust213–110.0114%12 Jul
nuke13–70.0627%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0012%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0614%10 Jul
cache9–13-0.0326%8 Jul
cache6–130.0024%8 Jul
cache13–10-0.0520%7 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0121%2 Jul
cache12–12-0.0219%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0616%24 Jun
ancient13–10.0523%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0218%10 Jun
dust216–120.0320%3 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0126%27 May
train13–00.1326%27 May
cache13–80.009%27 May
nuke5–13-0.0720%18 May
nuke13–40.0420%18 May
ancient10–60.0526%15 May
ancient13–6-0.0121%2 May
cache0–10-0.120%1 May
cache13–90.0825%29 Apr
cache12–120.0719%29 Apr
mirage9–130.0016%28 Apr
anubis0–13-0.0920%27 Apr
dust213–110.0022%27 Apr
train12–120.0313%22 Apr
dust27–13-0.0225%22 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0611%20 Apr
dust25–11-0.0015%18 Apr
nuke13–60.1324%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0715%18 Apr
mirage7–13-0.009%15 Apr
anubis13–40.0416%15 Apr
mirage13–70.0624%15 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0430%2 Apr
mirage13–110.0134%30 Mar
dust214–16-0.0120%23 Mar
dust213–4-0.0127%23 Mar
nuke4–130.0734%22 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0233%22 Mar
train6–130.1344%22 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0324%19 Mar
nuke10–130.1018%19 Mar
nuke13–80.0028%18 Mar
inferno13–90.0526%18 Mar
mirage13–50.1036%18 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0114%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0212%16 Mar
nuke11–130.0518%4 Mar
nuke15–150.0115%4 Mar
dust213–50.0120%4 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0137%4 Mar
dust213–30.1027%4 Mar
dust210–130.0927%3 Mar
mirage13–30.0927%3 Mar
inferno13–80.0323%3 Mar
mirage13–40.0516%3 Mar
dust28–13-0.0220%2 Mar
mirage16–120.0424%2 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0320%26 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0424%26 Feb
mirage7–130.0529%25 Feb
dust213–90.0115%25 Feb
mirage8–130.0424%25 Feb
nuke13–100.0225%24 Feb
nuke13–0-0.0428%24 Feb
mirage13–40.0422%24 Feb
dust213–5-0.0224%19 Feb
nuke2–130.0126%17 Feb
inferno5–130.0117%17 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0122%16 Feb
inferno8–130.0528%13 Feb
mirage13–100.0920%10 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0127%10 Feb
overpass13–50.0431%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →