RaiiinZyrox

RaiiinZyrox — CS2 Stats

DE76561198994942959[U:1:1034677231]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,080Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,331Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,507Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#76698 of 260004 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,579 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,507 +1,916 19 Jul – 31 Oct · 33 days played
17,91520,753peak 20,75319 Jul31 Oct
20,876Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,579Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,579
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 246 below peak (20,753)
  • +1,963 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,827 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,493 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate57.8%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy2.7%13.2%13.7%11.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.071.09above
Match win rate48.0%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaiiinZyroxFACEITLevel 9 · 1,579 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,507 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,579csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 29 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · nuke, 30 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 29 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · cache, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 74% over 23mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2317–674%0.01
dust2C145–936%0.00
nukeC146–843%0.01
infernoC145–936%0.00
cacheA127–558%0.03
mirageD124–833%-0.01
anubisA106–460%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,607Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
3,484Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
57.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
7,117MVPs
1,864Hours (in match)
2,935Bombs planted
926Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,884inferno
4,533dust2
2,751nuke
2,699vertigo
851train
196office
144lake
115cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

579Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15154%1.0615.5
Inferno9261%1.0515.2
Dust26456%1.0014.1
Anubis6354%1.0113.5
Mirage4939%0.9413.7
Vertigo4245%1.1215.8
Cache3057%1.1015.4
Nuke2948%1.0113.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
533msReaction time
51.9%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.99HE damage / grenade
5.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.0928% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.029%31 Oct →
dust25–13-0.028%31 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0516%30 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0510%29 Oct →
anubis13–40.1215%29 Oct →
nuke13–90.0123%28 Oct →
dust213–70.0935%28 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0613%24 Oct →
cache16–130.0418%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0124%18 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0215%18 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0617%17 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0121%12 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0316%12 Oct →
cache12–160.0618%11 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.018%10 Oct →
ancient13–70.0214%10 Oct →
inferno6–130.0313%9 Oct →
cache13–50.0332%8 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0417%1 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0121%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0034%30 Sept →
ancient9–130.0114%28 Sept →
nuke7–130.0024%28 Sept →
cache13–30.0517%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0316%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0414%24 Sept →
cache13–80.1021%23 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0615%23 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.1225%23 Sept →
ancient13–50.029%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0416%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.0117%20 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.037%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0412%18 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0241%18 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0118%18 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0516%18 Sept →
nuke9–4-0.0114%18 Sept →
ancient13–30.0413%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0718%11 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0422%11 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0116%8 Sept →
ancient13–80.0315%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0321%6 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0415%5 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0412%5 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0023%5 Sept →
ancient16–140.0015%5 Sept →
anubis13–90.0919%5 Sept →
inferno13–30.0724%5 Sept →
nuke5–130.0323%5 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0122%4 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0122%4 Sept →
inferno3–130.1224%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0213%29 Aug →
nuke13–50.1614%29 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0413%28 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0410%10 Aug →
inferno13–100.0113%2 Aug →
nuke10–130.0021%1 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.064%1 Aug →
inferno13–60.0213%1 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0421%1 Aug →
inferno9–50.0416%1 Aug →
anubis13–80.026%1 Aug →
cache7–130.0624%31 Jul →
inferno8–80.0123%31 Jul →
anubis19–22-0.0314%31 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0114%31 Jul →
ancient3–130.0320%31 Jul →
nuke13–30.0215%30 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0417%30 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0412%30 Jul →
ancient13–100.0720%30 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0116%30 Jul →
ancient13–70.0219%30 Jul →
nuke4–9-0.1413%30 Jul →
nuke9–30.0850%30 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0311%29 Jul →
dust213–60.0316%28 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0011%28 Jul →
ancient7–130.0422%27 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0111%27 Jul →
inferno8–130.0012%27 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.026%27 Jul →
dust29–130.0313%27 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0110%27 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0317%27 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0427%27 Jul →
ancient13–90.0315%27 Jul →
cache13–50.0418%27 Jul →
mirage2–8-0.026%27 Jul →
nuke12–160.0212%26 Jul →
mirage11–130.0519%19 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0212%19 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0612%19 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.009%19 Jul →
ancient13–80.0210%19 Jul →
ancient13–70.1015%19 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.