pakettikone

pakettikone — CS2 Stats

FI76561198990063616[U:1:1029797888]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,739Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,141Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,537 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,739 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 18 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,266 -453 18 Jan19 Jan · 2 days played
17,26617,719peak 17,71918 Jan19 Jan
Faceit ELO: 1,537 +0 19 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
1,5371,537peak 1,53719 Sept20 Sept
17,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,537Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-01-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,537
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2
Win rate50%
K/D0.63
Headshot %50%

Measured 13 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.1%45.7%46.8%9.7% short
Shot accuracy10.8%12.7%13.0%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate44.3%45.7%46.3%2.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpakettikoneFACEITLevel 7 · 1,537 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,537csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time668ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 24 Mar
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 7 Feb
461msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · office, 7 Feb
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1710759%0.03
nukeA117464%0.08
infernoC104640%0.00
anubisD93633%0.03
trainC94544%-0.01
dust2D82625%0.02
overpassC83538%0.01
vertigoD82625%0.03
mirageB84450%0.03
wardenC52340%0.04
italy3030%0.06
alpine220100%0.07
stronghold110100%0.00
office1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,773Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,637Matches
44.3%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
10.8%Shot accuracy
9,305MVPs
2,141Hours (in match)
4,163Bombs planted
1,265Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,639
AWP11,052
MP92,853
MAC-102,674
FAMAS1,758

Lifetime map wins

10,058inferno
5,553nuke
4,427vertigo
4,240dust2
1,821train
657office
47italy
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

936Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
77.7ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10451%1.2016.9
Mirage8048%1.0815.6
Inferno6455%1.4017.6
Nuke6055%1.1516.9
Anubis4347%1.1816.1
Dust23554%1.2015.8
Vertigo3453%1.6017.0
Overpass1867%1.2217.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
666msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
8.00HE damage / grenade
12.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1324% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5552% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0117%13 Sept
dust23–13-0.058%13 Sept
dust25–13-0.0327%12 Sept
nuke10–130.0315%12 Sept
overpass13–4-0.0217%11 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0416%11 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0012%11 Sept
dust29–130.0911%11 Sept
ancient13–110.0316%11 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0521%24 May
ancient13–110.0521%23 Apr
nuke13–40.0513%23 Apr
train1–13-0.0613%22 Apr
vertigo11–130.0416%17 Apr
train0–6-0.070%17 Apr
dust214–160.0318%17 Apr
inferno10–130.0616%17 Apr
overpass10–130.0416%17 Apr
dust24–13-0.0115%17 Apr
inferno13–100.0010%7 Apr
ancient3–13-0.1014%6 Apr
train13–40.027%1 Apr
anubis15–150.035%29 Mar
vertigo9–13-0.018%28 Mar
nuke13–60.0822%28 Mar
train6–130.0416%28 Mar
mirage12–120.1111%28 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0215%28 Mar
nuke9–70.0715%28 Mar
warden3–130.0018%27 Mar
stronghold13–60.003%27 Mar
mirage13–110.0819%27 Mar
inferno13–20.0815%27 Mar
ancient9–130.0213%27 Mar
dust213–70.1013%26 Mar
nuke13–100.1623%26 Mar
train13–7-0.0312%26 Mar
nuke13–00.2124%24 Mar
anubis13–80.1910%21 Mar
ancient13–6-0.080%20 Mar
dust211–13-0.0317%19 Mar
anubis11–130.0311%19 Mar
mirage6–130.0320%19 Mar
nuke13–100.0722%17 Mar
overpass13–60.077%17 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0420%17 Mar
nuke5–130.0516%11 Mar
ancient13–20.1420%1 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0214%28 Feb
nuke11–130.0019%28 Feb
alpine13–100.0723%28 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0417%27 Feb
vertigo13–10.0616%27 Feb
inferno13–50.0619%27 Feb
dust213–70.0713%22 Feb
train12–12-0.0416%22 Feb
vertigo8–130.0015%22 Feb
italy9–130.0222%21 Feb
nuke13–110.0911%21 Feb
inferno5–12-0.0011%21 Feb
warden13–20.048%21 Feb
ancient13–80.2019%14 Feb
warden5–130.0016%14 Feb
italy6–130.1023%14 Feb
ancient13–90.2018%14 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0310%14 Feb
anubis9–130.0316%14 Feb
vertigo2–130.0221%13 Feb
warden10–13-0.0227%13 Feb
train13–80.0013%9 Feb
ancient13–30.0715%9 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0320%8 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0415%8 Feb
warden13–100.1612%7 Feb
train2–13-0.0416%7 Feb
vertigo7–130.0113%7 Feb
inferno10–130.0313%7 Feb
office6–13-0.0912%7 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0415%7 Feb
inferno13–80.0333%7 Feb
ancient13–30.055%7 Feb
ancient2–90.009%7 Feb
mirage13–80.0117%5 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0416%5 Feb
train13–30.0915%30 Jan
anubis5–130.1022%30 Jan
nuke6–130.0517%30 Jan
overpass13–80.049%25 Jan
vertigo13–110.1716%25 Jan
inferno1–13-0.120%25 Jan
vertigo3–13-0.0317%25 Jan
italy8–130.056%24 Jan
alpine13–10.0710%24 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0213%24 Jan
mirage13–90.0718%20 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0417%19 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0017%19 Jan
overpass7–130.0314%18 Jan
ancient13–60.1028%18 Jan
mirage13–80.0219%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →