pakettikone

pakettikone — CS2 Stats

FI76561198990063616[U:1:1029797888]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,740Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,142Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,537 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,537 → 1,537
+1Tracked matches · now 1,740
0.0ppWin rate · 40.7% → 40.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,537 +0 19 Sept – 21 Sept · 3 observations
1,5371,537peak 1,53719 Sept21 Sept
17,322Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,537Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-01-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,537
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3——
Win rate67%——
K/D0.72——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.1%45.7%46.8%9.7% short
Shot accuracy10.8%12.7%13.0%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate44.3%45.7%46.3%2.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpakettikoneFACEITLevel 7 · 1,537 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,537csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateWWLLLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time664ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 24 Mar →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 7 Feb →
461msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · office, 7 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1710–759%0.03
nukeA117–464%0.08
infernoC104–640%0.00
anubisD93–633%0.03
trainC94–544%-0.01
dust2D82–625%0.02
overpassC83–538%0.01
vertigoD82–625%0.03
mirageC73–443%0.03
wardenC52–340%0.04
italy—30–30%0.06
alpine—22–0100%0.07
cache—11–0100%0.03
stronghold—11–0100%0.00
office—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,799Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,638Matches
44.3%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
10.8%Shot accuracy
9,310MVPs
2,142Hours (in match)
4,164Bombs planted
1,265Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,651
AWP11,053
MP92,853
MAC-102,674
FAMAS1,758

Lifetime map wins

10,058inferno
5,553nuke
4,427vertigo
4,240dust2
1,821train
657office
47italy
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

936Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
77.7ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10451%1.2016.9
Mirage8048%1.0815.6
Inferno6455%1.4017.6
Nuke6055%1.1516.9
Anubis4347%1.1816.1
Dust23554%1.2015.8
Vertigo3453%1.6017.0
Overpass1867%1.2217.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
662msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
13.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5422% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2309% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0316%12 Oct →
anubis13–110.0117%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.058%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0327%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0315%12 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0217%11 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0416%11 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0012%11 Sept →
dust29–130.0911%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0316%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0521%24 May →
ancient13–110.0521%23 Apr →
nuke13–40.0513%23 Apr →
train1–13-0.0613%22 Apr →
vertigo11–130.0416%17 Apr →
train0–6-0.070%17 Apr →
dust214–160.0318%17 Apr →
inferno10–130.0616%17 Apr →
overpass10–130.0416%17 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0115%17 Apr →
inferno13–100.0010%7 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.1014%6 Apr →
train13–40.027%1 Apr →
anubis15–150.035%29 Mar →
vertigo9–13-0.018%28 Mar →
nuke13–60.0822%28 Mar →
train6–130.0416%28 Mar →
mirage12–120.1111%28 Mar →
ancient13–3-0.0215%28 Mar →
nuke9–70.0715%28 Mar →
warden3–130.0018%27 Mar →
stronghold13–60.003%27 Mar →
mirage13–110.0819%27 Mar →
inferno13–20.0815%27 Mar →
ancient9–130.0213%27 Mar →
dust213–70.1013%26 Mar →
nuke13–100.1623%26 Mar →
train13–7-0.0312%26 Mar →
nuke13–00.2124%24 Mar →
anubis13–80.1910%21 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.080%20 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0317%19 Mar →
anubis11–130.0311%19 Mar →
mirage6–130.0320%19 Mar →
nuke13–100.0722%17 Mar →
overpass13–60.077%17 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0420%17 Mar →
nuke5–130.0516%11 Mar →
ancient13–20.1420%1 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0214%28 Feb →
nuke11–130.0019%28 Feb →
alpine13–100.0723%28 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0417%27 Feb →
vertigo13–10.0616%27 Feb →
inferno13–50.0619%27 Feb →
dust213–70.0713%22 Feb →
train12–12-0.0416%22 Feb →
vertigo8–130.0015%22 Feb →
italy9–130.0222%21 Feb →
nuke13–110.0911%21 Feb →
inferno5–12-0.0011%21 Feb →
warden13–20.048%21 Feb →
ancient13–80.2019%14 Feb →
warden5–130.0016%14 Feb →
italy6–130.1023%14 Feb →
ancient13–90.2018%14 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0310%14 Feb →
anubis9–130.0316%14 Feb →
vertigo2–130.0221%13 Feb →
warden10–13-0.0227%13 Feb →
train13–80.0013%9 Feb →
ancient13–30.0715%9 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0320%8 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0415%8 Feb →
warden13–100.1612%7 Feb →
train2–13-0.0416%7 Feb →
vertigo7–130.0113%7 Feb →
inferno10–130.0313%7 Feb →
office6–13-0.0912%7 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0415%7 Feb →
inferno13–80.0333%7 Feb →
ancient13–30.055%7 Feb →
ancient2–90.009%7 Feb →
mirage13–80.0117%5 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0416%5 Feb →
train13–30.0915%30 Jan →
anubis5–130.1022%30 Jan →
nuke6–130.0517%30 Jan →
overpass13–80.049%25 Jan →
vertigo13–110.1716%25 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.120%25 Jan →
vertigo3–13-0.0317%25 Jan →
italy8–130.056%24 Jan →
alpine13–10.0710%24 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0213%24 Jan →
mirage13–90.0718%20 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0417%19 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0017%19 Jan →
overpass7–130.0314%18 Jan →
ancient13–60.1028%18 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.