Mikael Awperfeldt

Mikael Awperfeldt — CS2 Stats

76561198888229291[U:1:927963563]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,176Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,368Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,840 -121 15 May – 24 May · 2 days played
15,84015,961peak 15,96115 May24 May
16,061Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-05-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate53.7%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy4.9%12.0%12.4%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.301.021.03above
Match win rate45.9%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMikael AwperfeldtFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37–49–14Last 10037%Win rateWLLLWTTTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 4–3–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 7–9–4 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time576ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 11 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · fachwerk, 31 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 9mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoD165–1131%0.04
poseidonB157–847%0.03
cacheD124–833%0.00
infernoA95–456%-0.03
nukeB84–450%-0.01
mirageD81–713%-0.03
ancientD72–529%-0.00
debrisD51–420%0.10
anubisC52–340%-0.02
dust2—41–325%0.01
fachwerk—31–233%-0.03
eldorado—30–30%-0.08
overpass—22–0100%0.06
train—21–150%-0.00
boulder—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,678Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
2,060Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
4.9%Shot accuracy
6,473MVPs
521Hours (in match)
1,644Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,138inferno
1,847vertigo
1,461nuke
1,437dust2
290train
220cbble
187office
65ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
77.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.1214.4
Ancient1258%1.5317.3
Nuke944%1.1214.3
Inferno743%1.0516.9
Vertigo450%0.8010.3
Anubis367%1.3619.7
Train10%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
580msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
8.46HE damage / grenade
9.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0332%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0514%12 Oct →
vertigo7–130.0524%12 Oct →
mirage2–100.0611%12 Oct →
overpass13–60.0515%2 Oct →
cache12–120.0414%2 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0622%27 Sept →
vertigo12–120.1843%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0320%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0312%20 Sept →
cache13–30.0221%20 Sept →
inferno6–90.055%5 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0311%3 Sept →
train7–13-0.0127%3 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0215%3 Sept →
overpass13–40.0712%3 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0713%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0013%31 Aug →
dust23–130.0418%30 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0630%27 Aug →
vertigo6–130.0625%27 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0120%27 Aug →
train13–11-0.0025%27 Aug →
fachwerk13–50.0016%27 Aug →
vertigo6–130.0123%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0629%23 Aug →
fachwerk4–13-0.1050%31 Jul →
vertigo5–130.0823%31 Jul →
debris8–80.0117%29 Jul →
vertigo13–1-0.0317%29 Jul →
poseidon9–60.0423%27 Jul →
eldorado8–8-0.1213%27 Jul →
debris7–90.014%27 Jul →
fachwerk10–130.0117%27 Jul →
vertigo13–10.0126%27 Jul →
boulder13–4-0.0821%27 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.1012%26 Jul →
vertigo1–13-0.040%26 Jul →
inferno13–80.0232%25 Jul →
nuke5–130.0123%25 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0425%25 Jul →
debris8–80.0536%23 Jul →
eldorado4–9-0.0810%23 Jul →
poseidon5–90.0117%23 Jul →
debris8–80.1124%23 Jul →
eldorado8–8-0.0424%23 Jul →
debris9–10.3236%23 Jul →
poseidon6–9-0.0922%23 Jul →
poseidon4–9-0.2121%11 Jun →
poseidon2–9-0.1316%11 Jun →
poseidon4–9-0.0311%11 Jun →
poseidon9–70.0228%11 Jun →
poseidon8–80.0422%11 Jun →
poseidon6–9-0.0825%11 Jun →
poseidon9–00.3423%11 Jun →
poseidon9–50.1716%11 Jun →
poseidon9–40.1626%11 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1114%11 Jun →
poseidon9–60.0829%11 Jun →
cache3–13-0.0124%6 Jun →
nuke12–3-0.0318%6 Jun →
ancient8–130.0113%2 Jun →
nuke5–130.0626%2 Jun →
mirage9–130.0125%2 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0213%29 May →
vertigo4–130.0317%29 May →
inferno7–9-0.0612%28 May →
poseidon9–40.0742%28 May →
dust212–120.0622%28 May →
nuke8–13-0.0317%28 May →
vertigo13–90.0936%28 May →
cache13–10-0.0720%28 May →
vertigo13–80.0921%27 May →
inferno13–7-0.0424%27 May →
cache10–13-0.0326%27 May →
cache1–13-0.0618%26 May →
cache12–12-0.0419%24 May →
nuke11–130.0120%24 May →
mirage7–13-0.0835%24 May →
anubis12–12-0.0122%21 May →
dust213–10-0.0016%21 May →
cache10–130.0517%21 May →
vertigo13–80.0926%19 May →
inferno13–9-0.0024%19 May →
anubis13–80.0020%19 May →
cache13–100.0419%19 May →
cache6–130.0036%19 May →
vertigo6–13-0.0024%18 May →
cache13–100.0820%18 May →
ancient13–30.1021%18 May →
anubis9–13-0.0718%15 May →
nuke13–5-0.0521%15 May →
inferno13–7-0.0717%15 May →
ancient10–13-0.0222%15 May →
ancient6–130.0334%9 May →
vertigo10–130.0020%9 May →
mirage8–13-0.0614%7 May →
cache2–130.0012%7 May →
anubis13–90.0330%7 May →
nuke13–70.0028%7 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.