Qtamo

Qtamo — CS2 Stats

76561198977779205[U:1:1017513477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,067Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#52072 of 260020 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,350 +784 2 Jul – 4 Jul · 2 days played
21,56622,350peak 22,3502 Jul4 Jul
22,350Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,463Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,463
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQtamoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,463csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning63
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–33–6Last 10061%Win rateLWWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.3
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time551ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 30 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 29 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 15 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 74% over 23mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2517–868%0.03
infernoS2317–674%0.07
ancientC104–640%0.02
nukeS75–271%0.04
vertigoD62–433%-0.01
mirageD61–517%-0.01
overpass—43–175%0.01
dust2—44–0100%0.03
train—43–175%0.04
fachwerk—31–233%0.04
poseidon—21–150%-0.01
debris—21–150%0.03
boulder—21–150%0.07
eldorado—10–10%0.06
warden—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
59%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
85.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4055%1.2017.4
Mirage3259%1.1214.4
Inferno2556%1.1515.4
Dust22378%1.4217.8
Anubis2157%1.0514.9
Nuke1457%1.2618.6
Overpass333%1.0615.3
Cache3100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
550msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
12.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0154% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0514%4 Nov →
inferno13–100.0925%4 Nov →
cache13–50.0616%4 Nov →
vertigo3–9-0.1311%31 Oct →
inferno9–50.0517%31 Oct →
vertigo13–60.1115%30 Oct →
cache11–130.0216%30 Oct →
overpass13–100.0519%30 Oct →
inferno9–40.2029%30 Oct →
cache13–110.0310%29 Oct →
inferno9–20.1837%29 Oct →
inferno5–90.0420%29 Oct →
mirage13–20.1111%25 Oct →
dust216–120.0419%25 Oct →
inferno9–60.1118%25 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0112%5 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0120%27 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0321%3 Sept →
train7–130.0111%3 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.049%3 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0414%3 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0220%28 Aug →
cache13–00.0527%27 Aug →
train13–110.049%27 Aug →
fachwerk13–50.019%27 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0224%27 Aug →
inferno10–130.0217%23 Aug →
inferno16–120.0115%23 Aug →
ancient6–130.0412%15 Aug →
cache13–10.1222%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0611%15 Aug →
inferno9–70.0814%15 Aug →
nuke13–60.1226%14 Aug →
nuke13–50.0927%14 Aug →
debris9–20.129%14 Aug →
cache13–100.0318%14 Aug →
inferno8–80.1823%14 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0715%14 Aug →
mirage8–130.0421%8 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0314%8 Aug →
inferno9–30.1730%8 Aug →
dust213–80.0520%30 Jul →
boulder12–120.0525%30 Jul →
fachwerk12–120.0528%30 Jul →
cache13–80.0026%30 Jul →
inferno12–120.0532%30 Jul →
poseidon9–60.0014%27 Jul →
eldorado8–80.067%27 Jul →
debris7–9-0.0711%27 Jul →
fachwerk10–130.0631%27 Jul →
vertigo13–10.0320%27 Jul →
boulder13–40.0811%27 Jul →
cache13–20.0515%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.0411%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0016%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0215%19 Jul →
inferno13–70.019%19 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0315%19 Jul →
cache4–130.0326%19 Jul →
inferno13–100.005%13 Jul →
ancient7–130.0316%13 Jul →
cache13–80.0320%13 Jul →
inferno9–40.1427%13 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0412%10 Jul →
nuke13–90.038%10 Jul →
nuke13–50.0211%10 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0414%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.0124%10 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.026%10 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0715%10 Jul →
cache13–40.1131%7 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.008%7 Jul →
ancient8–130.0621%7 Jul →
inferno16–130.0913%7 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0512%7 Jul →
cache11–130.047%7 Jul →
nuke16–130.0112%4 Jul →
warden13–100.0711%4 Jul →
cache13–60.0220%4 Jul →
overpass13–3-0.0020%4 Jul →
cache13–20.0315%2 Jul →
overpass6–130.0227%2 Jul →
ancient13–60.0214%2 Jul →
inferno9–50.1419%2 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0116%30 Jun →
cache13–4-0.0214%26 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0213%26 Jun →
inferno5–130.0013%26 Jun →
cache13–110.0714%26 Jun →
ancient4–130.0214%25 Jun →
cache10–130.0513%25 Jun →
train13–30.0517%23 Jun →
train13–50.0717%21 Jun →
inferno13–60.0414%18 Jun →
ancient13–100.0621%18 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0315%18 Jun →
cache13–100.0717%17 Jun →
cache13–100.046%16 Jun →
ancient13–70.0419%16 Jun →
cache13–60.0415%16 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.