Qtamo

Qtamo — CS2 Stats

76561198977779205[U:1:1017513477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,052Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#50086 of 252055 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,350 +15 5 Jun – 4 Jul · 5 days played
21,56622,350peak 22,3505 Jun4 Jul
22,622Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,463Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-06-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,463
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQtamoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,463csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–35–7Last 10058%Win rateLTLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time580ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 14 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 14 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 15 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2315–865%0.03
infernoS1914–574%0.05
ancientC135–838%0.02
nukeS96–367%0.02
mirageC83–538%-0.01
dust2S54–180%0.02
vertigo—41–325%-0.00
train—43–175%0.04
overpass—42–250%-0.01
fachwerk—31–233%0.04
poseidon—21–150%-0.01
debris—21–150%0.03
boulder—21–150%0.07
eldorado—10–10%0.06
warden—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
59%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
85.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4055%1.2017.4
Mirage3259%1.1214.4
Inferno2556%1.1515.4
Dust22378%1.4217.8
Anubis2157%1.0514.9
Nuke1457%1.2618.6
Cache3100%1.2714.0
Overpass333%1.0615.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
576msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
9.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.92% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0112%5 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0120%27 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0321%3 Sept →
train7–130.0111%3 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.049%3 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0414%3 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0220%28 Aug →
cache13–00.0527%27 Aug →
train13–110.049%27 Aug →
fachwerk13–50.019%27 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0224%27 Aug →
inferno10–130.0217%23 Aug →
inferno16–120.0115%23 Aug →
ancient6–130.0412%15 Aug →
cache13–10.1222%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0611%15 Aug →
inferno9–70.0814%15 Aug →
nuke13–60.1226%14 Aug →
nuke13–50.0927%14 Aug →
debris9–20.129%14 Aug →
cache13–100.0318%14 Aug →
inferno8–80.1823%14 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0715%14 Aug →
mirage8–130.0421%8 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0314%8 Aug →
inferno9–30.1730%8 Aug →
dust213–80.0520%30 Jul →
boulder12–120.0525%30 Jul →
fachwerk12–120.0528%30 Jul →
cache13–80.0026%30 Jul →
inferno12–120.0532%30 Jul →
poseidon9–60.0014%27 Jul →
eldorado8–80.067%27 Jul →
debris7–9-0.0711%27 Jul →
fachwerk10–130.0631%27 Jul →
vertigo13–10.0320%27 Jul →
boulder13–40.0811%27 Jul →
cache13–20.0515%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.0411%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0016%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0215%19 Jul →
inferno13–70.019%19 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0315%19 Jul →
cache4–130.0326%19 Jul →
inferno13–100.005%13 Jul →
ancient7–130.0316%13 Jul →
cache13–80.0320%13 Jul →
inferno9–40.1427%13 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0412%10 Jul →
nuke13–90.038%10 Jul →
nuke13–50.0211%10 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0414%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.0124%10 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.026%10 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0715%10 Jul →
cache13–40.1131%7 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.008%7 Jul →
ancient8–130.0621%7 Jul →
inferno16–130.0913%7 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0512%7 Jul →
cache11–130.047%7 Jul →
nuke16–130.0112%4 Jul →
warden13–100.0711%4 Jul →
cache13–60.0220%4 Jul →
overpass13–3-0.0020%4 Jul →
cache13–20.0315%2 Jul →
overpass6–130.0227%2 Jul →
ancient13–60.0214%2 Jul →
inferno9–50.1419%2 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0116%30 Jun →
cache13–4-0.0214%26 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0213%26 Jun →
inferno5–130.0013%26 Jun →
cache13–110.0714%26 Jun →
ancient4–130.0214%25 Jun →
cache10–130.0513%25 Jun →
train13–30.0517%23 Jun →
train13–50.0717%21 Jun →
inferno13–60.0414%18 Jun →
ancient13–100.0621%18 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0315%18 Jun →
cache13–100.0717%17 Jun →
cache13–100.046%16 Jun →
ancient13–70.0419%16 Jun →
cache13–60.0415%16 Jun →
inferno9–60.098%16 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0015%14 Jun →
mirage13–00.017%14 Jun →
overpass11–130.0014%14 Jun →
ancient16–130.0220%14 Jun →
nuke13–50.0336%14 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0222%14 Jun →
cache12–120.0522%14 Jun →
dust213–50.0327%13 Jun →
nuke6–130.0310%9 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0717%5 Jun →
mirage13–20.0410%5 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0317%5 Jun →
inferno13–80.0211%5 Jun →
ancient9–130.0319%5 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.