Spacehamsterin

Spacehamsterin — CS2 Stats

DE76561198842072428[U:1:881806700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,462Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,648Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,606Blue band · top ~30.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,606 -726 30 Sept – 30 Oct · 21 days played
12,30815,332peak 15,33230 Sept30 Oct
15,990Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-09-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 726 below peak (15,332)
  • -726 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 394 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.0%42.7%43.8%4.8% short
Shot accuracy0.2%11.2%12.0%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.790.991.020.23 short
Match win rate42.7%43.9%44.7%2.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSpacehamsterinFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,606 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning46
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateWWWWWWWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −101ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 9–0–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility3.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.6
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time619ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 5 Oct →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 9 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 4 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 88% over 8infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD186–1233%-0.03
mirageC187–1139%-0.01
dust2D186–1233%-0.01
anubisA159–660%-0.01
nukeC104–640%-0.03
ancientD93–633%-0.03
cacheS87–188%-0.01
office—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.27
overpass—10–10%-0.19
eldorado—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,809Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
3,514Matches
42.7%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
5,800MVPs
1,260Hours (in match)
3,623Bombs planted
607Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,689
MP76,162
AWP2,212
SG 5531,390

Lifetime map wins

8,482dust2
3,943inferno
3,140nuke
2,239office
1,858vertigo
477train
42italy
35ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
41%Win rate
0.52Avg K/D
50.5ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo633%0.477.8
Ancient425%0.7514.3
Mirage367%0.458.0
Anubis333%0.405.7
Overpass1100%0.455.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
614msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
4.97HE damage / grenade
3.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4059 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–10.0327%30 Oct →
inferno13–90.0020%30 Oct →
ancient13–50.0418%30 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0114%26 Oct →
cache13–40.0120%26 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0411%25 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0011%25 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0411%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.0015%21 Oct →
anubis13–30.0415%19 Oct →
mirage7–130.0414%19 Oct →
cache13–30.0025%19 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0317%19 Oct →
dust26–13-0.028%18 Oct →
office13–70.0626%17 Oct →
cache13–60.0112%17 Oct →
mirage12–160.0114%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0016%17 Oct →
dust213–40.0023%17 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.096%17 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0722%17 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0419%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0015%17 Oct →
dust213–160.0224%16 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0318%16 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0913%16 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0818%16 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0512%16 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.026%16 Oct →
mirage13–80.0113%15 Oct →
dust213–60.0227%15 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.014%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0413%13 Oct →
anubis13–60.0414%13 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0217%13 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0313%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0128%13 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.1210%13 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0512%13 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0615%13 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0511%13 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0811%11 Oct →
dust25–130.0226%11 Oct →
dust213–80.0326%11 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0419%11 Oct →
anubis13–110.0215%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.0519%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0022%11 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1214%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0217%11 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0816%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0312%10 Oct →
anubis15–150.0014%10 Oct →
dust213–80.049%10 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0512%10 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0211%10 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0115%10 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0220%10 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.0821%10 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0321%10 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.0624%10 Oct →
inferno8–80.0913%10 Oct →
nuke9–60.0714%10 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0912%10 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
dust213–70.0230%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0410%8 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0015%8 Oct →
mirage13–60.0213%8 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0615%8 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0623%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0022%8 Oct →
vertigo9–40.2720%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0413%5 Oct →
mirage5–130.0013%5 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.038%4 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.1422%4 Oct →
inferno6–90.0311%4 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0415%4 Oct →
overpass1–9-0.195%4 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.1111%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0511%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0513%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.079%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0212%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0416%3 Oct →
eldorado9–7-0.0523%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0612%3 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0510%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0310%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0311%2 Oct →
nuke16–140.0113%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0312%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0212%2 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0213%2 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0012%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0417%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0411%30 Sept →
nuke3–130.0221%30 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.