LVL 20 GRAND MASTERBAITER

LVL 20 GRAND MASTERBAITER — CS2 Stats

US76561198803422702[U:1:843156974]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

540Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
567Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,001Blue band · top ~39% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,001 -3,337 28 Aug – 4 Oct · 26 days played
12,00816,423peak 16,42328 Aug4 Oct
16,950Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,422 below peak (16,423)
  • -3,377 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,999 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches93——
Win rate32%——
K/D1.11——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 7 Sep 2026 → 6 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate48.1%42.0%44.3%above
Shot accuracy11.1%9.6%11.9%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.981.030.16 short
Match win rate39.9%43.8%45.2%5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLVL 20 GRAND MASTERBAITERPREMIER13,001 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning64
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–54–8Last 10038%Win rateWLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time540ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 1 Oct →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · overpass, 29 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · office, 27 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC187–1139%0.00
ancientD164–1225%0.01
nukeD155–1033%0.00
infernoB147–750%-0.03
cacheC135–838%-0.01
dust2A117–464%-0.00
anubisD70–70%-0.01
office—22–0100%-0.05
overpass—20–20%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.08
poseidon—10–10%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,941Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,631Matches
39.9%Match win rate
48.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
11.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
3,241MVPs
567Hours (in match)
737Bombs planted
216Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,403dust2
1,879inferno
1,768nuke
672office
605lake
361vertigo
251cbble
130train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.4%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
535msReaction time
45.0%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
1.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.7713 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0134%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0618%2 Oct →
ancient11–130.1324%2 Oct →
ancient11–130.0414%2 Oct →
mirage13–20.0610%1 Oct →
anubis11–130.0332%1 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
nuke13–40.1537%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0514%29 Sept →
cache13–50.0628%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0031%29 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0414%29 Sept →
dust213–80.0227%29 Sept →
ancient6–130.0133%29 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0121%28 Sept →
vertigo9–7-0.0824%28 Sept →
cache15–150.0218%27 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0022%27 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0122%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0524%25 Sept →
ancient2–130.0524%25 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0611%25 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.1014%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0414%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0728%24 Sept →
anubis6–130.0430%24 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0627%24 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.1324%24 Sept →
nuke9–50.0930%24 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0129%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0437%23 Sept →
cache11–130.0139%23 Sept →
mirage16–140.0333%23 Sept →
mirage13–30.0645%22 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0325%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0013%22 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0013%22 Sept →
ancient9–130.0421%22 Sept →
office13–8-0.0139%22 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0227%22 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0528%21 Sept →
dust216–120.0523%19 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0324%19 Sept →
ancient6–130.0329%19 Sept →
inferno13–70.0236%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0126%19 Sept →
overpass12–120.0223%19 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0436%19 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0531%17 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0438%17 Sept →
anubis3–130.0528%17 Sept →
dust213–90.0529%15 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.1319%15 Sept →
nuke9–130.0220%13 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0317%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0231%11 Sept →
mirage5–130.0543%11 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0919%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0436%10 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0629%9 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0120%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0427%6 Sept →
inferno9–50.0513%6 Sept →
nuke13–100.0338%4 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0523%4 Sept →
ancient13–80.0224%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0426%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.1121%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0524%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0521%3 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0111%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.0028%3 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0729%2 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0516%2 Sept →
ancient13–20.0638%2 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0513%2 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0623%2 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0512%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0321%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0019%1 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.013%1 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0131%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0114%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0141%1 Sept →
nuke15–150.0722%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0626%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0825%29 Aug →
overpass8–80.0257%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.0926%29 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0327%29 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.2023%29 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0626%29 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0514%28 Aug →
inferno13–110.0114%28 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1033%28 Aug →
nuke7–90.0317%28 Aug →
mirage15–150.0024%28 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0430%28 Aug →
inferno13–60.0934%27 Aug →
office13–9-0.1031%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.