Zychrix

Zychrix — CS2 Stats

DE76561198377477192[U:1:417211464]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,230Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,228Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,937Top 25% of 208,191 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43360 of 255593 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,661 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,937 +2,426 5 Aug – 13 Oct · 18 days played
20,51123,338peak 23,3385 Aug13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,661 +0 31 Aug – 3 Oct · 3 observations
1,6611,661peak 1,66131 Aug3 Oct
23,338Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,661Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-07-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,661
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 401 below peak (23,338)
  • +1,010 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,063 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches27——
Win rate67%——
K/D1.33——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 20 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.3%46.8%48.2%3.9% short
Shot accuracy15.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.061.07above
Match win rate37.5%46.3%46.9%9.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZychrixFACEITLevel 8 · 1,661 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,937 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,661csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.8
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time492ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–6 · office, 5 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 19 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 19 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · office, 13 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3618–1850%0.01
infernoC145–936%0.01
dust2B126–650%0.03
nukeD103–730%0.00
anubisS75–271%0.03
cacheS75–271%0.01
officeS64–267%0.10
ancientS64–267%0.04
fachwerk—10–10%0.01
overpass—10–10%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,992Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
4,602Matches
37.5%Match win rate
44.3%Headshot %
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,142MVPs
1,359Hours (in match)
4,087Bombs planted
748Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,046
AWP12,156
MP92,022
FAMAS1,861
MAC-101,675

Lifetime map wins

2,637inferno
2,238dust2
2,120nuke
1,649vertigo
1,331office
368cbble
332train
68safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches
55%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
73.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6261%1.1413.2
Anubis3956%1.1413.8
Inferno3165%1.0614.3
Dust22442%0.9814.5
Ancient2259%1.0114.6
Nuke1450%0.9314.1
Vertigo633%1.0614.7
Overpass633%0.9015.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
488msReaction time
45.3%T opening success
60.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
7.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0450%19 Oct →
dust213–60.1123%19 Oct →
nuke7–130.0419%13 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0221%13 Oct →
mirage13–50.0719%12 Oct →
office13–80.0922%11 Oct →
mirage13–20.0113%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.1127%10 Oct →
anubis13–100.0123%6 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0222%6 Oct →
dust29–130.0919%6 Oct →
mirage7–130.0015%29 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0210%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0420%27 Sept →
dust213–100.0525%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0423%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0324%23 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.092%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0324%23 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0724%21 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0614%21 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0716%21 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0018%20 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0113%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.0614%16 Sept →
nuke9–40.0818%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0214%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.0815%15 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.048%15 Sept →
anubis8–130.0717%15 Sept →
mirage13–90.1315%14 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0129%14 Sept →
mirage12–120.0712%11 Sept →
fachwerk7–130.0115%11 Sept →
cache13–110.0412%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.0919%11 Sept →
dust211–130.0221%11 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0318%8 Sept →
cache1–130.0117%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0519%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0916%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0316%3 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0222%3 Sept →
dust26–130.0040%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.029%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0524%1 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0511%1 Sept →
inferno4–0-0.020%1 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0913%1 Sept →
cache13–30.0118%1 Sept →
mirage9–130.0424%31 Aug →
anubis13–40.0715%31 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0221%31 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0421%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0419%26 Aug →
inferno10–130.0522%26 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0213%23 Aug →
ancient11–130.0425%22 Aug →
mirage7–130.049%22 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0417%22 Aug →
dust213–40.0314%22 Aug →
mirage7–130.0417%18 Aug →
nuke13–90.0117%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0724%16 Aug →
nuke5–90.0015%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0816%6 Aug →
ancient13–80.0917%5 Aug →
mirage13–60.0341%4 Aug →
inferno8–130.0319%3 Aug →
office8–130.0926%2 Aug →
inferno9–50.0618%31 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.0712%31 Jul →
ancient13–110.0216%31 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.0210%31 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0118%31 Jul →
mirage13–20.0715%30 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0321%30 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0416%30 Jul →
inferno9–30.0816%29 Jul →
inferno13–40.1930%29 Jul →
cache13–100.0324%28 Jul →
anubis13–90.0916%28 Jul →
office6–130.0128%27 Jul →
anubis16–130.0112%26 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0321%25 Jul →
office13–90.0736%25 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0428%23 Jul →
inferno6–90.0934%21 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.1111%21 Jul →
mirage13–10.0015%21 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0226%21 Jul →
mirage13–50.0214%20 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0811%19 Jul →
mirage15–150.0623%17 Jul →
mirage13–20.037%17 Jul →
nuke11–130.0317%16 Jul →
office13–00.1027%13 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0133%13 Jul →
office13–60.2222%5 Jul →
overpass8–80.1115%5 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.