chirp

chirp — CS2 Stats

DK76561198361961023[U:1:401695295]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,386Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,708 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,708 → 2,708
+39Tracked matches · now 4,386
+6.7ppWin rate · 46.7% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 10 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,973 +3,761 13 May22 May · 5 days played
23,21227,217peak 27,21713 May22 May
Faceit ELO: 2,708 +0 30 Aug18 Sept · 2 observations
2,7082,708peak 2,70830 Aug18 Sept
27,249Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,708Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-04-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,708
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 292 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchirpFACEITLevel 10 · 2,708 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,708csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning62
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6040Last 10060%Win rateWLLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −10.9pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time562ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy30.4%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 30.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 7–13 · nuke, 3 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 9 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 11 May
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 14 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 20dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA29181162%0.00
nukeS2015575%0.01
anubisA1911858%-0.00
mirageA127558%0.00
infernoD62433%-0.04
cacheA53260%-0.02
dust2D51420%-0.03
overpass43175%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,727Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
80.9ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient89657%1.0616.8
Nuke54453%1.0717.1
Anubis46648%0.9815.8
Mirage38844%1.0116.5
Vertigo28356%1.0717.3
Inferno19147%0.9215.7
Overpass16043%0.9215.2
Train13559%1.0915.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
552msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
59.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
12.1%Flash assists
10.45HE damage / grenade
7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1209% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–14-0.0519%5 Sept
mirage16–190.0137%4 Sept
nuke13–160.0228%26 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0810%20 Aug
mirage19–170.0222%19 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1227%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0022%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0134%14 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0522%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0129%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0532%5 Aug
ancient13–80.0344%4 Aug
nuke7–130.2049%3 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0034%31 Jul
nuke13–80.0027%30 Jul
ancient4–130.0536%28 Jul
anubis11–130.1132%27 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0330%27 Jul
cache19–160.0043%25 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0031%8 Jul
ancient13–50.0233%6 Jul
anubis19–160.0320%5 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0331%30 Jun
cache2–5-0.0333%24 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0523%22 Jun
cache10–13-0.0552%21 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0436%14 Jun
cache13–10-0.0327%12 Jun
ancient2–130.0331%5 Jun
ancient17–19-0.0222%5 Jun
nuke9–70.0425%4 Jun
dust28–13-0.0343%4 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0320%2 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0416%1 Jun
ancient8–130.0027%1 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0143%31 May
ancient13–4-0.0129%31 May
overpass13–90.0033%28 May
inferno9–13-0.0523%24 May
nuke13–100.0218%23 May
inferno13–90.0125%23 May
ancient16–130.0325%23 May
ancient13–60.0640%22 May
mirage5–13-0.0745%22 May
cache13–9-0.0223%22 May
overpass13–70.0021%21 May
nuke13–80.0528%17 May
ancient13–50.0825%17 May
dust213–11-0.0448%16 May
ancient5–13-0.0723%15 May
ancient19–150.0225%15 May
mirage13–3-0.0221%15 May
mirage12–16-0.0026%15 May
dust26–13-0.0048%14 May
nuke13–3-0.0515%14 May
anubis5–0-0.0722%14 May
mirage13–50.0823%14 May
ancient5–13-0.0342%14 May
nuke13–80.0431%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0234%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0529%14 May
mirage13–7-0.0621%14 May
ancient13–9-0.0625%14 May
ancient13–30.0344%14 May
anubis13–10.0133%14 May
inferno13–10-0.0030%14 May
anubis13–00.1330%14 May
anubis13–90.0323%14 May
ancient13–30.0028%13 May
overpass11–20.0728%13 May
nuke13–7-0.0435%11 May
ancient13–100.1136%11 May
anubis13–60.0132%11 May
nuke13–4-0.0221%9 May
ancient13–10-0.0128%9 May
ancient13–70.1429%9 May
ancient0–13-0.0860%9 May
nuke13–10.1138%9 May
mirage13–100.1142%8 May
overpass10–130.0328%3 May
nuke13–100.0134%2 May
ancient13–9-0.0218%26 Apr
anubis13–100.0227%21 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0049%13 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0315%11 Apr
anubis7–130.0013%11 Apr
dust25–13-0.0534%11 Apr
anubis7–130.0013%11 Apr
dust25–13-0.0534%11 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0315%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0428%11 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0726%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0216%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0216%11 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0726%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0428%11 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0318%10 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0414%10 Apr
ancient13–7-0.038%10 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0520%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →