N4xx1s

N4xx1s — CS2 Stats

DK76561198283226264[U:1:322960536]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,445Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,929 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,929 → 3,929
+26Tracked matches · now 5,445
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 12 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,204 +1,080 18 Mar17 Apr · 2 days played
26,12427,204peak 27,20418 Mar17 Apr
Faceit ELO: 3,929 +0 28 Aug3 Sept · 3 observations
3,9293,929peak 3,92928 Aug3 Sept
27,204Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,929Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-03-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,929
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 71 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGN4xx1sFACEITLevel 10 · 3,929 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,929csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateWLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time496ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 18 Mar
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · anubis, 6 May
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 8 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
27In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 16ancientWeakest map · 42% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC26111542%0.01
anubisB1991047%0.01
nukeS1614288%0.05
infernoB137654%0.04
dust2C94544%0.05
mirageB84450%0.02
overpassB63350%-0.00
cache1010%0.04
poseidon110100%0.19
vertigo110100%0.27

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,579Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
80.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient107853%1.1216.4
Anubis73653%1.1616.5
Nuke67254%1.1316.1
Mirage30549%1.1015.6
Vertigo24265%1.2216.9
Overpass23554%1.2216.7
Dust221950%1.0114.5
Train20861%1.2916.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
506msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
8.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9534% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–20.0728%8 Sept
mirage11–130.0316%6 Sept
nuke13–10.1627%1 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0116%9 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0214%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0219%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0725%8 Aug
nuke13–70.0115%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0717%8 Aug
dust213–40.0417%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0229%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.039%7 Aug
anubis13–80.0627%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0817%2 Aug
dust216–120.1123%31 Jul
dust210–130.0429%24 Jul
anubis13–10.0513%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0929%15 Jul
nuke13–10.0934%15 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0714%15 Jul
ancient13–160.0518%2 Jul
overpass13–80.0518%22 Jun
anubis16–19-0.0221%16 Jun
mirage13–80.0111%16 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0023%7 Jun
cache10–130.0430%31 May
inferno5–13-0.0023%31 May
anubis9–13-0.0411%30 May
inferno13–100.1125%29 May
ancient13–70.0925%28 May
nuke13–80.0517%28 May
mirage6–130.0513%28 May
inferno8–13-0.0723%27 May
ancient13–4-0.0426%26 May
anubis13–90.0312%25 May
poseidon9–20.1914%22 May
ancient13–70.0727%19 May
nuke13–100.0020%18 May
ancient11–13-0.0126%14 May
inferno13–70.1118%13 May
nuke11–10.0220%8 May
inferno13–10-0.0132%8 May
anubis13–8-0.0140%6 May
inferno13–110.1017%3 May
anubis13–8-0.0121%23 Apr
anubis13–100.0623%21 Apr
inferno13–90.0617%17 Apr
anubis11–130.0929%17 Apr
nuke13–70.1023%17 Apr
inferno13–70.1727%17 Apr
anubis19–170.0418%16 Apr
ancient13–80.0310%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0224%11 Apr
dust25–130.0028%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0224%11 Apr
dust25–130.0028%11 Apr
ancient13–80.0310%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0119%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0316%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0117%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0117%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0316%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0119%11 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0024%10 Apr
nuke6–130.0116%10 Apr
ancient13–70.0410%10 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0210%10 Apr
ancient13–80.0023%7 Apr
inferno8–130.0815%5 Apr
ancient9–130.0116%5 Apr
anubis13–80.0310%5 Apr
ancient13–10.0310%5 Apr
nuke16–120.0919%5 Apr
ancient10–130.0219%5 Apr
anubis13–30.0815%5 Apr
ancient13–90.0916%5 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0817%31 Mar
ancient5–130.0121%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0624%27 Mar
overpass13–70.0622%27 Mar
ancient8–130.0321%26 Mar
dust26–130.0527%24 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0013%24 Mar
nuke13–70.0319%20 Mar
dust26–13-0.0216%19 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0117%19 Mar
nuke9–50.1323%18 Mar
vertigo9–10.2730%18 Mar
dust27–10.1625%18 Mar
ancient13–80.1113%18 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0212%18 Mar
nuke13–40.0821%17 Mar
nuke13–70.0123%17 Mar
nuke7–130.0714%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0316%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0515%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0515%14 Mar
overpass13–4-0.0215%14 Mar
dust213–50.0518%14 Mar
ancient11–130.0419%12 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →