PihLziNh0+

PihLziNh0+ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198277353799[U:1:317088071]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,138Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,952 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (42 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,952 → 2,952
+56Tracked matches · now 2,138
+6.7ppWin rate · 40.0% → 46.7%

Rating over time

2,952Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2025-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,952
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 48 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPihLziNh0+FACEITLevel 10 · 2,952 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,952csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning65
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.09 avg rating · +11.3pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 38%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.7
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.5
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time524ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy29.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 5–8 · rush_001, 3 Oct →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Nov →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 31 May →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 21dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA3117–1455%0.02
nukeS2115–671%0.04
anubisC146–843%0.02
dust2D81–713%-0.00
trainS75–271%0.02
infernoC73–443%0.00
overpass—44–0100%0.05
rush_001—31–233%0.20
mirage—31–233%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.10
jura—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,344Matches
60%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
88.1ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient46455%1.2818.1
Anubis32160%1.3017.8
Nuke28952%1.2818.3
Inferno9961%1.3017.3
Overpass6748%1.2218.3
Mirage6641%1.0917.3
Train5558%1.4719.1
Dust24840%1.1917.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
526msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
64.1%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
13.8%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
18.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.3742% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–6-0.0132%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.1157%25 Oct →
nuke13–60.1133%25 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0424%13 Oct →
rush_0015–80.2233%3 Oct →
rush_0013–70.1743%3 Oct →
rush_0014–00.2155%2 Oct →
ancient13–50.0628%2 Oct →
train11–130.0354%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0316%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0531%22 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0325%2 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0120%2 Sept →
ancient13–40.0522%27 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0119%26 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0025%22 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0132%31 Jul →
nuke19–16-0.0031%2 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0632%21 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0326%14 May →
inferno13–110.0532%3 May →
anubis10–130.0216%22 Apr →
anubis13–100.0018%21 Apr →
ancient13–30.1234%18 Apr →
ancient13–80.0413%11 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0128%11 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0336%11 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0128%11 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0336%11 Apr →
ancient13–80.0413%11 Apr →
nuke13–80.0725%11 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0329%11 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0525%11 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0525%11 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0329%11 Apr →
nuke13–80.0725%11 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0223%10 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0034%10 Apr →
ancient13–70.0329%10 Apr →
anubis9–130.0018%10 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0335%7 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0135%5 Apr →
ancient9–130.0146%5 Apr →
anubis13–80.0324%5 Apr →
ancient13–10.0629%5 Apr →
nuke16–120.0314%5 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0022%5 Apr →
anubis13–30.0526%5 Apr →
ancient13–90.0630%5 Apr →
ancient7–130.0136%3 Apr →
ancient13–10.0821%21 Feb →
anubis3–13-0.0042%6 Feb →
nuke17–190.0431%21 Jan →
anubis8–130.0221%17 Jan →
nuke13–40.0427%16 Jan →
overpass13–110.0124%12 Jan →
overpass13–80.0231%5 Jan →
nuke13–70.0721%5 Jan →
nuke13–80.0936%5 Jan →
nuke13–40.0223%5 Jan →
overpass13–10.1225%3 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0516%2 Jan →
train13–80.1049%2 Jan →
train13–110.0330%6 Dec →
overpass13–20.0629%6 Dec →
ancient13–7-0.0023%27 Nov →
mirage16–19-0.0115%23 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0631%21 Nov →
ancient9–130.0532%14 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0738%14 Nov →
nuke13–50.0660%1 Nov →
ancient13–70.0118%31 Oct →
inferno13–110.0218%31 Oct →
ancient16–140.0126%27 Oct →
nuke13–90.1026%19 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0422%18 Oct →
train13–7-0.0336%18 Oct →
vertigo13–80.1024%18 Oct →
train13–110.0420%17 Oct →
ancient13–90.0435%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.1341%17 Oct →
nuke13–60.0418%17 Oct →
dust212–120.1232%17 Oct →
nuke13–50.0224%22 Jul →
inferno13–60.0730%22 Jul →
jura13–110.0334%21 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0226%21 Jun →
nuke10–130.0323%9 Jun →
ancient13–90.1026%8 Jun →
dust213–90.0925%8 Jun →
anubis19–170.0724%2 Jun →
anubis13–40.0850%31 May →
ancient16–190.0335%31 May →
anubis13–90.0332%31 May →
train8–130.0121%30 May →
ancient11–13-0.0030%25 May →
ancient13–80.0629%24 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.106%10 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0526%30 Mar →
nuke12–160.0631%9 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.