BqreKarriganStats🐼

BqreKarriganStats🐼 — CS2 Stats

76561198361899075[U:1:401633347]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,300Tracked matches23%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,137 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,137 → 3,137
+3Tracked matches · now 4,300
0.0ppWin rate · 23.3% → 23.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 10 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,137 +0 28 Aug18 Sept · 6 observations
3,1373,137peak 3,13728 Aug18 Sept
3,137Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-04-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,137
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 363 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBqreKarriganStats🐼FACEITLevel 10 · 3,137 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,137csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning42
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD3466Last 10034%Win rateLLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −108ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 431ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 435ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 33% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.2
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time491ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 491ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 30 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 30 Aug
297msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 31 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 22 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L7Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 13% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA22121055%-0.01
infernoD1641225%-0.01
anubisD1521313%-0.02
cacheD1221017%-0.04
mirageD123925%-0.02
nukeC114736%-0.01
dust2D72529%-0.01
overpassS550100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,467Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
84.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient75453%1.1016.1
Anubis45649%1.0715.8
Nuke40256%1.1016.5
Inferno25953%1.0716.3
Overpass16046%1.1216.7
Mirage14744%1.0016.3
Train11652%1.1417.2
Vertigo8953%1.0316.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.0%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
487msReaction time
12.7%T opening success
32.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
17.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.7184% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0416%15 Sept
anubis6–80.0426%15 Sept
cache5–13-0.0533%14 Sept
cache0–13-0.0721%12 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0329%12 Sept
cache14–16-0.0413%8 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1315%8 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0111%8 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0917%31 Aug
anubis10–13-0.049%31 Aug
cache13–5-0.0218%30 Aug
anubis13–110.0717%30 Aug
cache13–8-0.0439%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0324%20 Aug
cache5–130.0224%18 Aug
anubis3–13-0.056%18 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0229%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.039%18 Aug
mirage4–130.0018%18 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0329%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0312%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1013%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0712%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.0117%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0728%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0915%2 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0412%29 Jul
nuke10–130.0336%29 Jul
anubis13–110.0429%26 Jul
ancient16–140.0223%26 Jul
cache10–130.0218%26 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0427%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0210%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.058%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0126%22 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0319%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.077%22 Jul
ancient3–130.0526%21 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0224%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.0819%30 Jun
inferno13–40.0726%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0413%30 Jun
ancient13–40.0227%28 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0733%26 Jun
mirage3–130.0124%26 Jun
nuke13–60.0714%15 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0511%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0528%24 May
nuke7–130.0421%24 May
inferno6–13-0.0528%24 May
ancient16–140.0518%24 May
overpass13–90.0217%24 May
overpass13–90.0217%24 May
ancient16–140.0518%24 May
overpass16–12-0.0211%23 May
inferno13–50.0614%23 May
overpass16–12-0.0211%23 May
ancient13–7-0.0515%23 May
dust213–70.0330%23 May
ancient13–7-0.0515%23 May
dust213–70.0330%23 May
mirage9–13-0.050%23 May
inferno14–16-0.0021%23 May
inferno14–16-0.0021%23 May
mirage9–13-0.050%23 May
overpass13–90.0123%22 May
nuke7–13-0.0419%22 May
ancient13–90.0114%22 May
inferno13–20.0114%22 May
mirage9–130.0029%22 May
anubis11–13-0.0821%24 Apr
ancient13–50.0110%22 Apr
dust28–130.0215%19 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0627%19 Apr
dust28–130.0215%19 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0627%19 Apr
nuke6–130.0218%19 Apr
mirage13–20.0526%19 Apr
nuke6–130.0218%19 Apr
mirage13–20.0526%19 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0419%19 Apr
inferno6–130.0319%18 Apr
mirage13–40.049%18 Apr
ancient5–130.0134%18 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0014%18 Apr
ancient8–130.0516%18 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0223%16 Apr
ancient13–80.0321%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0417%11 Apr
dust25–13-0.0728%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0417%11 Apr
dust25–13-0.0728%11 Apr
ancient13–80.0321%11 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0412%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0020%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0639%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0639%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0020%11 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0412%11 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0313%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →