SaMsInG

SaMsInG — CS2 Stats

DK76561198184797381[U:1:224531653]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,977Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,132 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,977 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 63 days played since 2 Nov 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,132 +0 28 Aug18 Sept · 7 observations
3,1323,132peak 3,13228 Aug18 Sept
14,669Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,132Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2024-11-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,132
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 368 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSaMsInGFACEITLevel 10 · 3,132 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,132csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning79
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44542Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 442ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.6
Positioning7.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning7.9
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time443ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 471ms → last ⅓ avg 443ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 12 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · train, 2 Mar
297msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 11 Apr
22–2Biggest win · ancient, 19 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 0% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB29131645%0.03
anubisC167944%0.00
nukeS129375%0.06
mirageA116555%0.09
infernoD100100%0.04
overpassC94544%0.02
train41325%-0.02
cache32167%0.13
dust231233%0.09
vertigo2020%0.03
debris110100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,817Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
81.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient38754%1.2117.1
Anubis28757%1.2617.8
Nuke25355%1.2817.5
Inferno13552%1.2517.4
Overpass12552%1.2017.4
Mirage12351%1.1617.3
Train6850%1.3616.6
Vertigo6162%1.2417.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
442msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
62.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
12.1%Flash assists
11.21HE damage / grenade
14.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0237% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–13-0.0117%7 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0418%7 Sept
debris9–60.2320%17 Jul
inferno7–90.1111%17 Jul
cache7–13-0.0211%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0141%13 Jul
mirage14–160.1634%12 Jul
cache13–40.1519%12 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0220%22 Jun
ancient13–40.1223%13 Jun
mirage4–130.0119%12 Jun
mirage13–60.0510%12 Jun
cache13–10.2622%12 Jun
nuke10–130.0133%10 Jun
ancient13–60.0733%29 May
ancient13–100.0717%27 May
anubis13–80.0724%6 May
anubis13–10-0.059%21 Apr
ancient15–150.0421%13 Apr
ancient13–80.0622%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0233%11 Apr
dust25–130.0517%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0233%11 Apr
dust25–130.0517%11 Apr
ancient13–80.0622%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0222%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0228%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0026%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0026%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0228%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0222%11 Apr
anubis8–130.0131%10 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0529%10 Apr
ancient13–7-0.014%10 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0135%10 Apr
ancient13–80.0721%7 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0430%14 Mar
inferno8–130.1030%11 Mar
mirage13–80.1338%11 Mar
ancient5–130.0719%11 Mar
inferno7–130.0533%11 Mar
dust213–90.1533%11 Mar
mirage13–20.1227%11 Mar
anubis13–100.0943%11 Mar
ancient13–110.1216%10 Mar
overpass13–100.0418%7 Mar
ancient5–130.0230%7 Mar
ancient20–22-0.0119%11 Feb
mirage13–110.0837%24 Jan
overpass9–130.0017%6 Jan
ancient13–90.0347%6 Jan
mirage6–130.1523%30 Dec
overpass14–160.0031%14 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0317%14 Dec
nuke13–70.0438%14 Dec
inferno10–130.1231%1 Dec
nuke16–130.1022%30 Nov
nuke16–130.0926%24 Nov
overpass9–13-0.0128%22 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0229%8 Nov
overpass13–110.0317%30 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0227%30 Oct
train8–13-0.0924%20 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0129%1 Sept
overpass11–130.0329%1 Sept
mirage13–90.1243%22 Aug
nuke13–100.0348%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0218%20 Aug
train13–80.0325%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0824%2 Aug
overpass13–60.0839%1 Aug
overpass13–110.0325%28 Jul
inferno11–130.0022%14 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0324%14 Jul
train11–130.0133%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0510%29 Jun
ancient9–130.0226%20 Jun
ancient17–190.0120%16 Jun
anubis13–90.0329%30 May
ancient11–13-0.0124%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0116%16 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0216%5 Apr
anubis13–30.054%26 Mar
anubis13–110.0325%9 Mar
train5–13-0.0250%2 Mar
nuke9–10.1050%10 Jan
ancient13–70.0520%5 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0221%3 Jan
ancient8–130.0421%3 Jan
ancient22–20.0720%19 Dec
anubis10–13-0.0224%6 Dec
anubis16–19-0.0326%5 Dec
anubis19–16-0.0221%5 Dec
anubis7–13-0.0326%4 Dec
vertigo12–120.0530%2 Dec
nuke13–100.2039%2 Dec
ancient13–90.0121%4 Nov
mirage10–130.1733%3 Nov
nuke13–60.2030%3 Nov
vertigo2–130.0222%2 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →