succulent chinese meal

succulent chinese meal — CS2 Stats

FM76561198337192466[U:1:376926738]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,350Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,354Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,955Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71269 of 261547 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 409 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+141Premier CS Rating · 20,814 → 20,955
0Faceit ELO · 409 → 409
+12Tracked matches · now 1,350
−6.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,955 +1,449 26 Jun – 14 Nov · 12 days played
19,50622,123peak 22,12326 Jun14 Nov
22,123Peak Premier in tracked matches
409Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-06-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 409
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 — 92 to go

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,168 below peak (22,123)
  • -1,168 over 30 days · declining
  • +956 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,045 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.8%41.8%42.7%4.9% short
Shot accuracy12.7%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.060.980.99above
Match win rate48.1%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsucculent chinese mealFACEITLevel 3 · 409 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,955 · Pink bandPEAK ELO409csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateLLWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time550ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 11–13 · dust2, 26 Jun →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 27 Jul →
234msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · nuke, 27 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2313–1057%0.02
mirageC187–1139%0.01
nukeA148–657%0.02
infernoA127–558%0.00
anubisD112–918%0.00
officeA53–260%0.06
cacheC52–340%-0.03
trainD51–420%0.01
ancient—41–325%-0.03
vertigo—20–20%0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,131Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4,113Matches
48.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
37.8%Headshot %
12.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
9,898MVPs
1,620Hours (in match)
2,726Bombs planted
1,163Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,283
AWP10,884
MAC-103,056
SSG 082,880
MP92,866
Knife1,839

Lifetime map wins

7,992inferno
5,396dust2
2,057nuke
1,101office
1,025vertigo
735train
340cbble
93italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

159Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2850%0.9814.5
Dust22357%0.9416.8
Nuke1861%1.1117.2
Inferno1560%1.0015.1
Ancient956%0.8914.1
Anubis540%0.6514.0
Overpass580%1.3721.8
Vertigo450%0.5911.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
544msReaction time
49.2%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.63HE damage / grenade
5.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4577 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0522%14 Nov →
mirage3–130.0017%14 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0116%14 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0222%14 Nov →
dust213–2-0.0321%14 Nov →
nuke13–30.129%6 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.048%6 Nov →
dust28–130.0317%6 Nov →
anubis13–40.0720%6 Nov →
office11–130.0113%29 Oct →
nuke6–90.0320%29 Oct →
nuke13–100.0114%29 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0214%29 Oct →
mirage13–90.0337%23 Oct →
cache10–13-0.048%23 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0518%23 Oct →
anubis7–130.0127%16 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0414%16 Oct →
inferno2–20.1911%16 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0113%16 Oct →
train11–13-0.0413%9 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0320%2 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0018%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.0318%2 Oct →
dust213–7-0.059%29 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0318%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1117%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0527%26 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.098%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0724%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0423%25 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0215%25 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0620%25 Sept →
dust213–40.0321%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0413%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.1021%18 Sept →
mirage13–10.0715%11 Sept →
inferno13–80.0126%11 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0134%11 Sept →
office13–40.0514%4 Sept →
office2–90.0537%4 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0440%4 Sept →
mirage2–30.125%4 Sept →
inferno15–150.0517%4 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0128%28 Aug →
mirage1–130.0119%28 Aug →
nuke13–100.0217%28 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0223%28 Aug →
dust213–70.0721%22 Aug →
dust213–60.0313%22 Aug →
overpass9–13-0.0215%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0013%14 Aug →
dust213–50.0526%14 Aug →
train13–90.0119%14 Aug →
train9–130.0227%14 Aug →
train4–13-0.0130%14 Aug →
dust20–4-0.0650%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.028%9 Aug →
dust210–130.0519%31 Jul →
mirage15–150.0316%31 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0513%31 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0416%31 Jul →
mirage13–110.0115%31 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.059%31 Jul →
inferno5–0-0.0317%31 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0426%31 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0714%31 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0725%31 Jul →
mirage10–130.0514%31 Jul →
inferno6–130.0122%31 Jul →
dust211–130.0418%31 Jul →
nuke13–90.0514%31 Jul →
mirage13–60.0119%31 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0652%27 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0450%27 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0118%27 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0226%27 Jul →
nuke3–00.0217%27 Jul →
nuke13–100.0529%27 Jul →
nuke13–30.1722%27 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0414%27 Jul →
anubis10–130.0722%26 Jul →
anubis5–130.0712%26 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0411%25 Jul →
inferno13–40.0433%17 Jul →
dust213–110.019%17 Jul →
mirage9–130.0113%17 Jul →
office13–60.1536%10 Jul →
office13–80.0216%10 Jul →
cache10–130.0011%1 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0317%1 Jul →
dust212–120.0514%1 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0324%1 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0313%27 Jun →
dust211–130.2414%26 Jun →
dust213–40.1525%26 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0525%25 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.036%25 Jun →
dust213–10.1717%19 Jun →
train7–130.0717%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.