♚𝔑𝔦ℭ0™♚ — CS2 Stats

76561198334999137[U:1:374733409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,727Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,101Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#184654 of 257898 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+933Premier CS Rating · 9,066 → 9,999

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 -5,555 25 Aug – 27 Oct · 24 days played

16,000Peak Premier in tracked matches

24Days played since 2026-08-25

Premier CS Rating

5,946 below peak (15,945)
-5,120 over 30 days · declining
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	50.3%	42.7%	43.8%	above
Shot accuracy	2.6%	11.2%	12.0%	9.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.06	0.99	1.02	above
Match win rate	44.1%	43.9%	44.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48

Positioning65

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWWWLLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +102ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 694ms

Last 10

7–2–1 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.8

Utility5.1

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8

Positioning6.5

Utility5.1

Mechanics1.8

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time585ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy14.0%−4.0%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 30 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 11 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · ancient, 2 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	26	12–14	46%	0.00
nuke	S	16	13–3	81%	0.01
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
dust2	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
mirage	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,591Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

2,719Matches

44.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players

2.6%Shot accuracy

5,161MVPs

1,101Hours (in match)

2,524Bombs planted

443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,329

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,000

AWP7,329

Desert Eagle3,468

P2000 / USP-S2,542

Glock-182,479

MAC-102,073

MP91,268

XM10141,027

AUG776

Lifetime map wins

4,992inferno

4,462nuke

2,536vertigo

1,834dust2

549train

69office

43bank

28dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

196Matches

52%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

75.5ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	37	68%	1.06	15.2
Anubis	31	45%	0.93	14.4
Inferno	30	40%	0.95	14.5
Ancient	29	62%	1.01	15.3
Vertigo	26	46%	0.95	13.5
Mirage	20	35%	0.87	13.3
Overpass	13	54%	0.89	14.5
Dust2	5	60%	0.88	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.1%Spray accuracy

58.2%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

581msReaction time

63.3%T opening success

41.9%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

9.61HE damage / grenade

5.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0475% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4588 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–1	0.02	23%	27 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.08	17%	27 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.05	17%	27 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	11%	26 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	20%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	5%	26 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.00	14%	26 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	11%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.03	10%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.07	8%	26 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.04	18%	26 Oct →
cache	5–13	0.01	15%	26 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	24 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	22%	24 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.05	18%	24 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.01	18%	24 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	8%	24 Oct →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	15%	24 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.04	9%	24 Oct →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	20%	24 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.01	16%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.04	18%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.03	7%	24 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	17%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	11%	24 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	11%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.08	12%	23 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.03	13%	23 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.04	15%	23 Oct →
inferno	14–16	-0.00	8%	23 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.03	9%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	21%	22 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.03	12%	22 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	8%	22 Oct →
ancient	2–13	0.03	8%	21 Oct →
nuke	7–13	0.04	20%	21 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	23%	21 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	20%	21 Oct →
ancient	15–15	0.05	17%	20 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.02	15%	12 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	18%	12 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	10%	12 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.02	32%	12 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.00	18%	12 Oct →
inferno	4–13	0.01	16%	12 Oct →
ancient	13–2	0.09	16%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.05	33%	11 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.03	28%	11 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	13%	11 Oct →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	5%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	16%	11 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	17%	10 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.02	21%	10 Oct →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	15%	9 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	14%	9 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	24%	9 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.01	17%	9 Oct →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	18%	5 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	12%	5 Oct →
vertigo	13–10	-0.01	22%	5 Oct →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	18%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.07	18%	5 Oct →
ancient	9–13	-0.10	16%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.04	18%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	18%	4 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	4 Oct →
ancient	14–16	0.04	16%	2 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.07	15%	2 Oct →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	10%	2 Oct →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	23%	2 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.01	17%	2 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	20%	2 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	18%	2 Oct →
cache	14–16	-0.02	15%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.04	19%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–5	0.07	18%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.22	18%	30 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	29%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	18%	30 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	16%	30 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	33%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	16%	29 Sept →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	18%	29 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.03	14%	29 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	17%	21 Sept →
nuke	3–13	0.02	23%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	16%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.00	21%	21 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	19%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	9%	17 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.09	11%	17 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.04	16%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	18%	15 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	17%	8 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	15%	7 Sept →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	25%	7 Sept →
ancient	16–13	-0.03	18%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	12%	25 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	20%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	23%	25 Aug →