Adribo

Adribo — CS2 Stats

FR76561198319791690[U:1:359525962]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,128Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,330Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,677Purple band · top ~25.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 885 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 885 +0 31 Aug – 19 Sept · 2 observations
885885peak 88531 Aug19 Sept
15,677Peak Premier in tracked matches
885Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 885
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 16 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,677
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,323 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.4%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy12.3%12.0%12.4%meets
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate40.4%44.7%45.2%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAdriboFACEITLevel 5 · 885 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,677 · Purple bandPEAK ELO885csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning71
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.6
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning7.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time495ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.52Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 13 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 24 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 29 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 31anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB5124–2747%0.07
ancientA3117–1455%0.05
anubisD62–433%0.04
dust2—42–250%0.05
mirage—42–250%0.03
cache—21–150%0.05
boulder—11–0100%-0.01
shelter—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,537Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,204Matches
40.4%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12,504MVPs
1,376Hours (in match)
4,776Bombs planted
739Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,711
AWP4,429
FAMAS4,417
MP72,972
P901,498

Lifetime map wins

17,048inferno
887vertigo
724dust2
561nuke
365train
326cbble
132aztec
131office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches
48%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
71.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3749%1.1714.0
Ancient2544%1.2014.9
Anubis2560%1.1013.2
Overpass825%0.8213.3
Mirage475%0.9612.8
Vertigo40%0.7411.5
Nuke450%0.9912.5
Dust23100%1.1912.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
488msReaction time
60.8%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
7.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4489 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0024%4 Nov →
ancient13–60.0830%4 Nov →
ancient10–130.0114%4 Nov →
inferno13–110.0415%2 Nov →
anubis10–130.0416%2 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0215%31 Oct →
anubis13–20.0724%31 Oct →
inferno13–10.169%31 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0315%31 Oct →
boulder13–6-0.0121%30 Oct →
shelter13–50.0320%30 Oct →
dust213–70.1531%29 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.019%29 Oct →
anubis10–130.0621%26 Oct →
ancient13–30.2225%26 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0310%26 Oct →
inferno13–90.1117%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0721%25 Oct →
cache9–10.1824%25 Oct →
ancient13–110.0214%24 Oct →
inferno13–90.1412%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.0930%24 Oct →
ancient13–10.0318%24 Oct →
anubis9–130.0416%24 Oct →
ancient10–130.0513%24 Oct →
inferno13–00.0533%24 Oct →
ancient13–110.0518%24 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1943%24 Oct →
inferno13–90.0518%23 Oct →
inferno13–30.016%23 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0129%23 Oct →
mirage13–90.0623%23 Oct →
ancient12–120.0723%22 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0124%22 Oct →
ancient7–130.0333%21 Oct →
ancient11–130.0320%21 Oct →
inferno9–130.0119%18 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0813%18 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0728%18 Oct →
dust213–70.0413%18 Oct →
ancient13–60.0227%18 Oct →
ancient9–130.0820%18 Oct →
inferno5–90.0711%18 Oct →
inferno7–90.0529%18 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1211%18 Oct →
inferno9–40.1422%18 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0915%18 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0622%17 Oct →
inferno7–90.1619%17 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1413%17 Oct →
ancient5–130.0028%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0111%16 Oct →
mirage6–130.0425%16 Oct →
dust25–130.0239%16 Oct →
anubis13–60.0612%15 Oct →
ancient13–70.0724%15 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0020%14 Oct →
ancient10–130.0922%14 Oct →
inferno9–40.2318%14 Oct →
inferno9–40.2934%14 Oct →
inferno3–90.0730%14 Oct →
inferno5–90.1439%14 Oct →
inferno7–90.0923%14 Oct →
inferno9–70.1618%13 Oct →
inferno9–10.5221%13 Oct →
inferno13–60.0623%12 Oct →
inferno10–130.0615%12 Oct →
inferno9–30.2732%12 Oct →
ancient13–90.0624%8 Oct →
ancient13–40.2620%8 Oct →
ancient13–80.079%7 Oct →
ancient13–100.0711%7 Oct →
ancient9–130.0316%5 Oct →
inferno1–130.0329%5 Oct →
ancient10–130.0420%5 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0017%4 Oct →
ancient13–110.0717%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0422%2 Oct →
ancient13–70.0717%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0929%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0915%1 Oct →
inferno13–60.1322%1 Oct →
inferno9–60.2823%30 Sept →
inferno9–20.2330%30 Sept →
inferno7–90.0327%30 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0611%30 Sept →
inferno9–40.3116%30 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0017%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.0323%28 Sept →
inferno13–70.0416%28 Sept →
inferno11–130.0119%25 Sept →
inferno9–50.2224%25 Sept →
inferno5–90.1528%25 Sept →
inferno9–60.2333%25 Sept →
inferno4–90.0735%25 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0941%24 Sept →
inferno9–50.0442%24 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.2017%24 Sept →
inferno9–50.1328%24 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1013%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.