ungeflurmelt

ungeflurmelt — CS2 Stats

76561198309740308[U:1:349474580]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,200Tracked matches22%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,255Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.3 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,594Light Blue band · top ~61.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,594 -374 23 Jun – 29 Oct · 26 days played
8,22211,285peak 11,28523 Jun29 Oct
11,285Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-06-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,691 below peak (11,285)
  • -532 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,143 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,406 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate40.2%39.9%42.0%1.8% short
Shot accuracy8.4%7.0%9.6%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.920.980.11 short
Match win rate39.7%42.3%43.8%4.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGungeflurmeltPREMIER8,594 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim26
Positioning39
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–56–7Last 10037%Win rateLTLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim2.6
Utility1.8
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 674ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.6
Positioning3.9
Utility1.8
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time678ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 749ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 6 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 5 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–2 · inferno, 9 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · shelter, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910–953%-0.05
dust2D155–1033%-0.05
nukeC145–936%-0.04
anubisD123–925%-0.06
cacheC114–736%-0.06
mirageC94–544%-0.05
shelterD62–433%-0.04
office—30–30%-0.05
ancient—31–233%-0.01
overpass—33–0100%-0.04
fachwerk—20–20%-0.12
italy—10–10%-0.06
train—10–10%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,517Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,740Matches
39.7%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
8.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Light Blue band
7,941MVPs
1,485Hours (in match)
4,086Bombs planted
674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,846
AWP4,212
SG 5532,631
AUG2,284
FAMAS2,146
Knife1,910

Lifetime map wins

6,856inferno
4,729dust2
3,311nuke
1,407office
1,359train
1,303lake
893vertigo
397cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

56Matches
45%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
62.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1030%0.9311.2
Dust2922%0.487.3
Ancient850%0.7013.3
Nuke786%0.6911.3
Overpass540%0.8211.8
Mirage540%0.6611.0
Anubis367%0.8115.3
Cache367%0.596.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
22.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
23.9%Spray accuracy
70.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
674msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
21.7%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.46HE damage / grenade
0.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2703 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0421%29 Oct →
office12–12-0.0218%29 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0310%20 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0117%17 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0420%16 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0915%16 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.115%13 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0211%8 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0627%4 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0720%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.009%29 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0630%28 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0610%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0510%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0921%15 Sept →
nuke8–130.0420%12 Sept →
fachwerk5–13-0.1022%11 Sept →
shelter13–8-0.026%11 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0421%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0910%8 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0810%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.069%28 Aug →
cache15–15-0.1117%28 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0632%28 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0711%28 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0228%27 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0815%23 Aug →
italy4–13-0.0616%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.1110%20 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0619%18 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0729%16 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0816%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0021%14 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0122%14 Aug →
train5–13-0.0120%14 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.068%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0612%13 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0525%13 Aug →
inferno13–1-0.0112%13 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0913%13 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0729%12 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0111%12 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0613%12 Aug →
dust25–13-0.1018%11 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0627%11 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0320%11 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0427%10 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0714%9 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0514%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.097%7 Aug →
shelter1–13-0.0826%7 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0218%6 Aug →
inferno13–50.0619%6 Aug →
cache13–3-0.035%4 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.066%4 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0719%31 Jul →
ancient12–16-0.0116%30 Jul →
fachwerk2–13-0.1521%21 Jul →
cache16–130.0014%21 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0718%17 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0418%15 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.106%12 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0231%12 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0415%10 Jul →
shelter5–13-0.016%10 Jul →
shelter6–13-0.0921%9 Jul →
shelter12–12-0.0623%9 Jul →
shelter13–00.000%9 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0019%9 Jul →
inferno8–2-0.018%9 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0618%9 Jul →
office7–13-0.0927%9 Jul →
office4–13-0.0420%9 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0320%8 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0810%8 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0410%8 Jul →
dust213–50.0116%8 Jul →
overpass13–11-0.0918%7 Jul →
nuke7–9-0.0320%5 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0722%5 Jul →
nuke16–140.0118%5 Jul →
inferno0–13-0.1433%5 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0412%2 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0616%1 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0722%26 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.068%26 Jun →
inferno13–30.0217%26 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.129%25 Jun →
overpass13–40.019%24 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.038%24 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0510%24 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.126%24 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0226%23 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0821%23 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.029%23 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.1025%23 Jun →
vertigo8–8-0.167%23 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.1033%21 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0525%21 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0231%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.